[ G. R. No. 38934. June 08, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38934. June 08, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38934
[ G. R. No. 38934. June 08, 1934 ]
PEDRO NOGRAVICENTE, ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. SILVERIO POnTEJOS ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________23rd________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________5th__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all it parts, with the costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellee _________ from the __________the appellants _________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 186201, October 09, 2009
- [ G.R. NO. 142236. September 27, 2006 ](534 Phil. 551)
- G.R. No. 171101, July 05, 2011
- [ A.M. No. 301-MJ. July 25, 1975 ](160 Phil. 285; 71 OG 8548 (December, 1975))
- A.M. No. MTJ-99-1233 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 97-454-MTJ), December 08, 2003
- G.R. NO. 140457, January 19, 2005
- [ G.R. No. 118680. March 05, 2001 ](406 Phil. 167)
- [ G.R. No. 20485. November 29, 1963 ](G.R. No. 20485)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.