[ G. R. No. 41640. May 10, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41640. May 10, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41640
[ G. R. No. 41640. May 10, 1934 ]
MANUEL DE LA FUENTE, PETITIONER, VS. MUNICIPAL ROAD OF MANILA, RESPONDENT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________10th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Manila ________, dated the __________18th__________ day of __________April____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , set aside and the record immediately to said court of origin for the the issuance of a writ of mandamus as prayed for, without special pronouncement as to costs in either instances.
It is further ordered that xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________xx the sum of Pxx__________xx, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. Nos. 254854 and 256455, January 29, 2026
- [ G.R. NO. 162090. January 31, 2007 ](542 Phil. 558)
- [ G.R. No. 93707. January 23, 2001 ](402 Phil. 920)
- G.R. No. 190526, February 17, 2010
- G.R. No. 189255, June 17, 2015
- [ G.R. No. 237369. October 19, 2022 ](931 Phil. 534; 121 OG No. 44, 12448 (November 3, 2025))
- [ G.R. No. 108520. January 24, 1994 ](299 Phil. 517)
- A.M. No. RTJ-04-1838 (Formerly AM OCA IPI No. 03-1832-RTJ), March 18, 2004
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.