CTA Case No. 1790 (Decision)
\ OF TflE PHILlPPTN � CU t l' U.F TAX APPEAI,JI QtJEZON ClTI � � - - - ..... - ... � p - 0 r- 7 1. 1 2 0 o� 3, � '' ' c 0. (
. �.~. l? '.;u �~ ' .1 ... /'j\. al t on or- r, a -J tc: .p. t �~ � ...... '�.I . � :'I ' 1 I I.,, l- (f t.ui � rvlc t.tL. ap ovz: l ct' <:'liti t>c-ti ti ~r;, o ~r tton of i ..~ elect ' ~- 1 �\ ,\ � 1.0 n 16 5
l79:J 3 i tl r .r for t U_L � ct on ~5~ vf t on- 0 ')�'w tX p � tio �r 1� ' Ci51Ci1 0-l �- e ,, - . :o- c . J-l":.C . , V � � .. . ;r. 1� t1 � io1 -r 1:' - nt co~ - not tO' t. i vO rt 1 l 6 ,, �h t""x n {~\ e~ t.ior o n e'SJ.J.t>ip t ion uncl r .\l e ! ....e .,o ,tc..,... T ~ ~c �L~n ' r.>."' u ad ' ! ' :J l''p�.)�,;. ' ."t i..!> r;z~ ly� of J1.dy '. ;. 166
4 t ,. j 4 ' l �. �o, t .,..�. 1. ... 1, . . . .... . .. .. .. . .. , . ~- ., r. ' � :; { � .. ... . ... ...'~t�, ' . .! . .. . ,. "' . .. ...."' ....... . ...... ... ..* � � t � 4 � � � � � � � � � " .. ,) t . r�~ ' -.. I I"' ',, � . ll... - ci (".. ' 0 oll ! 167
-- .woO � ' 't.'''; ; r 1~" e t o \.1 j � : ' J;J r 111 s� 0 of. fo o�sr; !' 1 6 8
I ' � � ' rc .. � �* Q; r 169
;� 17 0
\ 1 p n tr � d.Qet it. th~ tl o., 1 � li <li t - '1;;.1 , U. R. .. +2!J, .l >r l 3 1 ,.. 0c .' l . v. v. , � of I t . t � ....;(~ ~0 0 ~ , c ri ... . ! ,.. . " ot l' I; .t l t �� � � � ~2' l,. l J� ., 1967; �'� c .. .. :l Co l . f In � v., c �- ' � , .; g f{"" � ,l.. ~~",36'1 ..... int 171
. l .ll "~~ ... OT.' C� .; ,;o. 1 � t 41. � 1 !--} ~) /N
l'i�'O J ' n~ so "x :..rc .. e c l ~� 1 fl 3
-. ll 0 i on
2 t.. c Io ., , :tranc 1 !J 0;. t tt th .f.foet th t they r� lit:.. ) .;ot J: s t t .r , ~ e .I.(,;. c t _o th 18, � cb 1 y, .I . ui:'. () t Q .t t ' , ... tl .. t. I , ( � ,t.:i.ClO tt""'*t 'iii! l 'iOner'J. .t"OG rec 1-... ~s t:roru l r .� ~ JO , 19 v 21!"' ... 3i t o, t; l .. l (" vn � .1. J. 9, ' .. � 1.~ ,. ) Q}-_Pl. ' ;. l.oLrie lie �~t ,. ]J. ._o e -b n:- t 175
.l s .l.u . . . .e l' 1.: �~)1 ap !'{ V''il () 1ts n"'W j r�� .c 1 ..:: ��~ . . St:t J'~ ,'1'-~ i'~ .. t,,;. no .�' t �. i'< JL :..t ~ c t.r � .t.. ,;.ln a it o 0 resia.~ .t of J....... J lli t � ..iJ. t . . . r .... l.t ~� ' , \ ~- t.i J.lO n,~., ctu..:. E. �� ~- -:...tt>:.l �G .3 ~.tto , [� � 1 r c. - �,~; . l::t s... "' .�:) ' '., L.~ , 1 �1M -~- ISH: �' ti tt ' ti L c 1. ~-� .;t... ": t �<?: ti- CO::'l..d tionc , .s
� I l ' � lt r- and b i. r .fi tio r 01. c u fl"O J p t!t1ot'lel" t a t n 1 ;, or �� v th pel ffir it on r 1 , tb. c tor r npa 1�l- e 1t r bi � � u �'J n or 17.--11 � 02 p .rcenta �.~ "' xes 177 ,
'v oJ n ( it co t Ci J t . J I t 178 \
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 4994 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4994)
- ATTY. VOLTAIRE ENRIQUEZ in his capacity as the CITY TREASURER OF TAGUIG CITY v. LA LUMIERE HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. AC-346)
- CTA Case No. 538 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 538)
- MA. ERLINDA T. ONG, Doing Business Under the Name and Style `Maranatha Sales Distributor, Duly Represented herein by her Attorney-in-fact, Ms. Ria A. Sablon, v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (CIR), BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE (BIR)(CTA Case No. 10444)
- CTA Case No. 5742 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5742)
- SYSTRA PHILIPPINES, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 546)
- PETRON CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE [consol with 10266 & 10267](CTA Case No. 10232)
- PENN PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7457)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.