CTA Case No. 293 (Decision)
fllliPU.8LlC U� THE t'HlLIPP!N D COURT OJ< I AX APPE ALS NANIJ...A r ''H"~ - ... � ""' � �c t; . ( .. 7 ... .. ... h� ~t ~� :U. t o '"1 �� ~J 210
i r. : ... ,, 211
212
� �� i� - 213
<. . � '- 21 . ), 214
� � - � � ('; .. tt? .. 215
I. t - " lc � ,, 216
.~ ... t,) u -f' � c; ;�'. .:1 �:71� ....�.~ ..., Vt: .. .. XC:C.t~� tl.'l' n� 0 J"' t ��. c i ..'c' .. . wj'.� r. .~... �1 ,. 217
~- - � ,: 218
� 't� I ~ 1< .... 219 Jf
' I_ f .. "-"" "l - I t ... l l I I I 220
221
� � I I j 222
., .: � .. l J I � '! wheTe a social club ' � ~�� 2... 2 3.
r t ! J. � �� ... 224
. .-<'" c t, ( ,. - t tr � 225
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 2684 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2684)
- WELLS FARGO ENTERPRISE GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC-PHILIPPINES, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2087)
- NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION v. MUNICIPALITY OF CAMALANIUGAN, CAGAYAN AND ALEXANDER L. MIGUEL(CTA Case No. EB 573)
- CTA Case No. 4960 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4960)
- CTA Case No. 5559 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5559)
- NOVARTIS HEALTHCARE PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10773)
- GOULDS PUMPS (PHIL) INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7057)
- CTA Case No. 586 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 586)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.