CTA Resolutions CTA Case No. 795795 1967-09-15
CTA Case No. 795 (Resolution)
� f�:Pt T""nc Of TH �. PUIU P'PJ. F.8 x P.P.E (,vLH. l c t< ' EZ.~.'JCI J' lJORT:':v'JEST AI:i.LI~:=:s , Il"C . , CTA CAS:S r o. 795 Petitioner , - versus - Respondent . X- - - - - - - - - - - - - X ? E S 0 L U T I 0 I: t j1e reasons s ta t ed in the 1 ~'Iotion to Dis'�niss " fil_cd by petitioner on August 16, J.967 , and ir!ithout objection on the part of counsel for respo�]dent , the sa..le should be , as it is hereby , GrtA:~T":!;D . / SO OTID:SRED . Quezon Cit y , September 15 , 1967 .
More in CTA Resolutions
- SONY PHILIPPINES INCORPORATED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10585)
- DAVAO CITY WATER DISTRICT v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with 8575)(CTA Case No. 8505)
- LEPANTO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8889)
- NELSON LACERNA, as represented by Virgilio A. Abogado v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5855)
- AGM VENTURES ENTERPRISES, INC. v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE represented by the COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11144)
- SOUTHERN PHILIPPINES POWER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6336)
- CTA Case No. 2927 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2927)
- CTA Case No. 3227 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3227)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.