CTA Case No. 1822 (Decision)
�tt;-<- /) / j' REPU!11.f C OF THE PHIL! PPJ 'l"E8 COURT OF T.\.X .\Pl>EALS QUEZON CITY - � 0J1 r .... c. � CA 22 II 0 e n.en � r~~ - - - - - - - ... .. .... - .... X I ,C l I 0 ic c 0 r: t' ic lC :1 c n fr t ar 19 1j r- ... II n 10 �tit1on rs l Q<ll. rio .l jf.>t 1 jo. l � ld t �u � rl l :ita~ l hn s Jld II d 1l f n te:t � lit, t: u. lo, o �inc f u n) . � 19 � 0 urp ti n �� .,n er ( b) '~t . al 1 inc r i �n rh 109
� 2 - 2- 0 f 0c i� ( c r r c ly 1 r --~--~~ ~~;~~----> � d i t1- � � � n� � 110
I -o . 1 22 .... 3 - � .I ij i! ,. 111
c - �l - mh 0 ec � f 1n h . 11;1h n th . wn .t � i n,. t0 t. l Jo t"ol h in J.'Ci n. sme t o � cl n y in i in('>t t c~r o- 1: i n. , rm ��~ .. , X c . on J ,;, on .o... ition h t .� r . I? 1 jo~ �1 th h ic\1 ural ti. s 1 � 1 jo ) rt ti .. n l lv � l .j' � n~y n.v r or- l� n '� n l l n r th ;- 112
ZC I ... CT �l - .... 113
... 2 - i n icu ur � y 'h nq 1 i0 on co... r i �I e is fr ct- n1 - tn t 0 ion � t .r fo.ce, :0 t ' l :1 t 0 (' � tJ. n ( d "t -� n n l, 0� lf '..J in � r n �r n t� f n O:t ~ r .n �o d r t � t .... ( >. 1 .... � "joi �cc un ih iQ s" , non J� 114
r - � �1 2 - 7- 9l 0 lJ. 0 � t en tn t � ... n- � �� � � 1 57� 1 2 .11 . 1 o. ) y ~ f.i.i ion o..-: o- . a 1 he n a c n r: ci,t hi r- .r l - in 1 t; yh of 'n to c. �n n,. c ) it 1 or ~ u- tion l e. ( � � i 0 n tio � � l; .. � � o. � 1 � ,. � - 32 r 2 II .97 � ... t n t 1. # ) 1) t e t.Ar .., 1 xable ion ( ) t~l d h d con- t. fi- (4) f- f C!Oh i l C) io 0 �{ i � 29 �� � .ct. 2 � 0 ,ie> i r ! ;~ 115
- � - .. y e � � lll (2 3 ., ; a ct � "4) . ~or uy 1 111. 1 y th h fore- � 197- ... ( � . >. s t fic1 1 1 1 (1) () t n 11 f 'i it n () tin it t - ite ell n in 0 1 ru t \1 i t sr r ti )1: n. f 0 tn n - n t �� ra 1 t f nr - lc v ai ua "cor . ncl e s joi t ... t c ni n 0 �J ( t v. r 1 �u "'� n c- 0 n�- � n 'P r - r If n� l .n ly - i ) r: cl pu - t r on �I l tl 116 I
� ... jo r () n � � ., 1 i r n n r 1 tl r y �� i 1 i r- �� 1r .. � �� iv r� � ,, 117
-o. 1 - 0- ,. 118
'--I 0 '" l -1 .n r 1 n n4 or pvr � 1 l v nu k n n pr eri it ci �h 'c t. t ri tt u .. u 1 r. or t c u -; 1. oc on ..... 119
'I ON ... c� A � o. 1 22 - - 1 t on n1 ting Law �7 120
1 .. I IOt � :. 121
- � 2 - c .� t ( t � � l� l1 1- i 0 - i � I� 122
- ... � � ( � .) - � 1 � �� - ;. 123
- � -1 c� � T .) w1 1 r: ch r h�~ orf t all w .r r ,. 1 r c -i n� i1 I e .t 9 r n iC r: O J; tor 1, r i � (To 3 II ff ' O. 4 ) I no L & t c �� '1 1 .rt n� r1 c ti ) n ne 1 n r 1 d t ..at w n e i r f l ... suc::c in it �h s - g �h pa 0 11 ( nto io q 1 � yc � � � � - � 18 o. � l96 � l 1 � 7.) -in- nt ,r st 0 E'lti i n a- r jo n � �� in e on �n ld .... i ni it u n .9 # 1 t t rn r1 a c rpo ti .. n: corp r t ffic J: ;) ro. on t m e ; p r ct n �� n i vi.. lt 9U1 y r th gist r.d
�2 7- "n � r 1 � �� � l ct 0 4( ) . c 1 1 l 1 � n- � ic r - - � n 1 1 � � . . .., 1� j � � � � .7 125
� 1 4. r� 1j � �� � � � � � � 7. � � � � � � � � � � .2 ������� � � ���� ���� l � � c 'i 1 1 � 1 c 1 t 1j r- 126
� 22 -l 1 7( ) � l h 1 l l � l� 127
I �1 - ( � 1 � � � � -1 9 , 2� � 11 v. � �� l. 1 ( 1� 1 � � L- 1 �1 � y, Lt �� 7) rv � r �� 1 n --o 1 � ll l v1 - 1 1 eo (L � 1 �� u � -l �� � � �� 1 1 128
- � 2 - 11 in i l c 1r..e n 1 # to 1 0 1 n i 1- 1 �( r � (.) . � � 1� � �� y c n � ( � n r ... 77 � � �� or � i � 37. c 11 . v. � 1n n � � � � 7� �� � � �� � 7� 7 � ) r t 0 � l i �J � l '� i j 1i . 129
- �2 - 2- � r he pre n 1 (\ t e n..~ i~ co i n inc lly s in l t l �.1 f c t n� 1� � h h v h .... tv 1 7 n ht r y j- ri r l 0 th ... in t 1� - i f ... c t i -� . ( ;;) � 1� () -� � � �� . . . � L - 11 0 � J.n. o. 1 10. l .) l h�t 11" t il � a ci n t; on r - c c nc ind ss t. lu th t"' ., 1 cl di l i�.s .ceo 0 �ly i1 lejo 0 !I; r t com l int. n c1 130
-� 1 � 1 ~wo r -2 e \1 n n 0 � i rr y ct 1� ic � � 0 n �� i c- j ) �h r cc u d c l nc � i n l n i � u n � � 1 c hr r� � � 197 � 0 i, .~�~. r ,. � 17 131
More in CTA Decisions
- CITY OF MAKATI AND JESUSA CUNETA AS CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF MAKATI v. GLOBAL BUSINESS POWER CORPORATION(CTA Case No. AC-235)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, v. RONIE ROMANO EUSTAQUIO(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-160)
- CTA Case No. 1349 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1349)
- NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION v. THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF COMPOSTELA VALLEY and CARMEN R. RAZUL, in her capacity as PROVINCIAL TREASURER OF COMPOSTELA VALLEY(CTA Case No. EB 607)
- TOTAL (PHILIPPINES) CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8479)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. SIXTA LEE GO G-40 City Plaza Mall Quiapo, Manila, No. 4 Kingfisher Street Zabarte Subdivision Novaliches Proper, Quezon City(CTA Case No. O-659)
- AVON COSMETICS, INC., VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9944)
- CTA Case No. 4720 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4720)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.