SM INVESTMENTS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY THIRD DIVISION SM INVESTMENTS C.T.A. CASE NO. 8642 CORPORATION, Members: Petitioner, - versus - BAUTISTA, Chairperson FABON-VICTORINO, and RINGPIS-LIBAN, JJ. Promulgated: COMMISSIONER OF DEC 2013 INTERNAL REVENUE, ~F~ 9 -�g,pa.--. Respondent. x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x RESOLUTION Before the Court is the Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review filed on November 12, 2013 by petitioner, praying for the withdrawal of the instant case on the basis that respondent has already partially granted its claim for refund at the administrative level. In view of the Manifestation filed by respondent on November 27, 2013, stating that she has no counterclaim pleaded against petitioner and has no objection to the relief prayed for, the subject Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review, is hereby GRANTED. WHEREFORE, the instant Petition for Review is deemed WITHDRAWN and this case is deemed CLOSED and TERMINATED. SO ORDERED.
RESOLUTION C. T. A. Case No. 8642 (On leave) MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN Associate Justice
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. O-42 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. O-42)
- SONIC SALES AND DISTRIBUTION, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8734)
- JG SUMMIT HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2397)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ANTONIO VALERIANO M. BERNARDO, (A.V.M. BERNARDO ENGINEERING) (AT-LARGE: Address: No. 604 T. Santiago St., Lingunan, Valenzuela City, Metro Manila)(CTA Case No. O-931)
- NEW MOON HOLDINGS (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. THE CITY OF TAGUIG AND ATTY. J. VOLTAIRE L. ENRIQUEZ IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF TAGUIG(CTA Case No. AC-340)
- CTA Case No. 5424 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 5424)
- MUNICIPALITY OF LABRADOR, PANGASINAN AND THE OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL TREASURER OF LABRADOR, PANGASINAN v. NATIONAL TRANSMISSION CORPORATION(CTA Case No. AC-112)
- CTA Case No. 952 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 952)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.