[ G. R. NO. 36279 & 36333. May 04, 1934 ]
[ G. R. NO. 36279 & 36333. May 04, 1934 ]
G. R. NO. 36279 & 36333
[ G. R. NO. 36279 & 36333. May 04, 1934 ]
RICARDO UGANIZAET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. REMIGIO URGANIZAET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________18th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Sur ________, dated the __________22nd__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________recover from the _____________the appellant_________the sum of ________P40.00_________, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- A.C. No. 9459, January 07, 2020
- [ G.R. No. L-48335. April 15, 1988 ](243 Phil. 505)
- G.R. No. 152529, September 22, 2003
- [ G.R. No. 6185. August 02, 1910 ](G.R. No. 6185)
- [ A.C. No. 14228 [Formerly CBD Case No. 23-6845]. July 15, 2025 ](A.C. No. 14228)
- [ G.R. No. 163868. June 04, 2009 ](606 Phil. 233)
- A.M. NO. P-04-1872, January 31, 2006
- G.R. NO. 173076, October 10, 2007
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.