CTA Case No. 533 (Decision)

V.J"VBLIC o. l"V"F PHILli".PlN!al C.<i)URT O.F l.A..c"X APPEALS UAND..A � G 1' t i J .,t~:;~ " i\f' ,-1 tt J I' t�rnal n� .. his i p nd nt �Olv r.... � r: h.J. . fr. . th en ci d xived �.fr tax t ., s.i- tl "" ch ~, . nt by j � l~o for only fo r t~ t�y� nwu r :son�e vth: 1' tax ~ , tt�1e:r o o ... th t~x . rlu f:rc _Jt'f- 477

� n .u. ": � e:n r.c l. � r i � 1 � .7 1 f1 478

(� - � 33 () l5 y� 10 - f l � � l 1 1 }a f j �� ... � �- � � � f In 1 0 � c 479 � nil ti i

.. .. ( 4- '-= :>nt 1 � i1 � t vl t - � ~ a- ~"'~ ( " . e. c � \,1... 1 t .i Co � � �J � � � � '� n� i l 11 i ct c n if! ~ y u l 1 i� t1 qu ul u in t� i � c�n i n '~ � tf i - f 2, �l u i� i 480

�( � - ' '� ... � 'i"� a t I' - 0 - J ,0 �) .. n� � ' �� � � � �C � ,---- 481