CTA Case No. 129 (Decision)
PUBLIC OP 1 Plill.IPI'l".. ~ ( Oll \i ( l I Ai'PEAt-<;, -\ 10 M.!D A, � T ���� etiti ~"� CA E � 129 Re ondent. !}J/1. -;Jfbr' X� � ~� ~ - � � � ~ It a � t tit:l.oner � :tonio l ina rl d t ni ez during t e Jap nea oc- aa t1 , or rtf.cul rl or ut ay � 1944. efon 1946, t h apeu a h d nelt r pr peniea no% buain ss f thei~ � KOIHIN81'� 1ft 1946 eti� ti r df t cn th un.t- ci lit1 ln � b int p �in e of Is b l � t 194 � cu nd t1t1on r f% h c c ��1 � �en ld t diff r t persons in nil th hit ri no Oaort � In 1949. petiti er�s wif , Antoni � de edina, lle dly It d to ngo � ln usin��� 475
� 129 I a1 � 1� . a uly l1 a ct 1 ~ de l�r� p�ti loner, f 19A l 2� I ld t he l t all 1g p cf � I" d .. o~1o. zue- 1 ne the � 1 � ef 1 � ~ � � iti � � e t pe t r . G%' ep�a t 476
ISIOtJ � C. T. A. CA N � 129 - 3- d . oo, 1n edd1t1 n t the � <If ti n above. T � def1cieney �ale ~a� fro 194 19 2 �� !ved at ft r dis g rdln th les o cia by p tit1oner to hi� wife f bi d v id pur$uant to iele the C.!.vil o C rt. 14 � o 1 C~vil Code) d c:ons � �al a al ega y m e y i� a p iti . �~' � J:iginal taxable - ----of the atio al ln- c .. � a. p tit1 n r c t�t he h gxo d at 11 1c: p b sa a wi~ f bu nesa sep r t d t nc: ~ e hu d the t%an~ ~ti n , f � etw di fe w re ��tid � real and not fic;ti- t i 1.1 � 11 13, 19~ . e pen t ins;ist w.i .., na � � beceus ere w � n p t!cn o p perty ~r ~ in t ~ a 3 cial � par ~1on of erty bet en p � an c t t th r hib i ~ e ntai n d in icl� 1490 of � Civil C � n Jul y 9 � 19 � peti.tione.r a n f l a pet1t 1 fo r c neider tion t � aase� nt, al- 1rst ti that t re ~ist� pra- rit 1 r t c l t e ep� ~ i n �~~ t1 a ex cute � en h a hi� wife and that 477
-4 d 1c ey lea x d g inet f l <46 t 1952 pr r.lb d� � p'".............r 10, ~ . the C f ff f h Bur a � t 1' c i �r- t vi nc: p t ti e.r, f h th sa y put hi � 1n ye 1949 to 19 2 t s n evi ence uf 1c abU he exi t nee, d e xec 1 t nta of the - Xt l ge the ep u es. no.~te\l'e.J:, t a '� ~ le h rt x � 1n hi 8GC eel nt t lof � � � � t. fc �e :r , t r fe zo fr p dent, n ct ee w1 h fin n p 11 . t p y the judie! 1 t le� t the � <178
- � 129 t of th latter1 � all d p.nu li 11-itiee. eti't ag n x que&ted reconai "' ap d�nt'a a waa dent in r p dent' a lettez dat 4, 19 � t aati�fied itb the decleion f re nd t . etit.i el' � eal d t th a rt. 1~1 d � n t dis � the fac that if t I Of el" t his wif� are t is- r a d . 1 ~ au tin und cla.red sales f 1. 49 19 2 s ax 1a in t � unt Of S2, . 24 xb. 5 , � 12. B~ r � ). cc rdin - ly, th deficiency ������ t ae c vted �� ~ h tic�Uy cozrect. H ce, the in� atan peal a lnly, if not exclusively, ba d u n e p aition that . !nes dt as t e%e al- legedly w a a pr -marit 1 a re ent enter 1nt bet en p t tioner nd h1a w f � the a tr s- acti a between tl ap �� fr 1949 19'2 valid d at tt 1e 1458 of the old iv1 iele 1 the n Civil Cod � th ot r d, ti t.'a def nae ia ba d u he 1 th t th� �ales fie- tit1 �� ai ulat d lbe lasuea �� p en c fi �~�tl y be stat as lewat r n t t ex� exists � prt ri al 89% ent of a selut � an- ti of r ezty execut b4t the s ���� t1 na nd t nJ.a de in 1 d, aa- 479
� -- � � � n that xi ri 1 n th hi to his sal 1 stl. et:f.ti et w!f iet nt n It i p r, th � - n U ad v td c u 1 f �� Civ 1 vid lly icl � � t1ti I � t l' � nt 1n in F. t �� I 1v ( 1 � � � t � o� 11 36 , t l)� b ie ci f t ri in 1 1t1 t d t out he t 8 �11 t in t v th at otit1 n 480
-- c ri in 1 ... ~t � sc p iv t r g y � gin 1 1 t bn () � a y X C 1 tr ( ). n 481
482
- ...... � � 129 .. ee, it G\lld - t . vi zi �f .. et1tl �~~"' �� tog � 1944, �� that t tw � r - etitionezo and ls wife n at hJ.a � d ou��� en � into � ed f re notary ublic by aald � er w1tb th ir - -.1 nt alle ly cent 1n ep tion uture p erty in���� it Will � ��� it � ( � c. c.. .- � � )Cb. � J, � 11 - 123, � � PP� ,..,...,...,_}}5, I ne. ) n , th t � � in rt � � te �a fully a tinl in ce ef et ti �~ t p � t . 1 � � ecutl e ntents of u. ed .. � � fintl , tha n nc slaten h 1 � the 1n the t�rial � etiti er 1o 483
. 129 - 10 - ina and his wife tea 1�1 tMafo.re he J"usttce P � f l n, Is ela , th t n vln h l r a t 1 c ptl rty .- that h� � t1 ( xh. e 1� er, test1fi h t X th �in 1 ( xh. ;J , � BI c. ) 1 - � ot e l' r it IS S � 1f. hi ry ar 1, f r Cl r f ed Of Iaa th x.c t n ll �� c. t � � P� � 62-6 � ). 1' r a t hat 1 " i aUy 1 Of 944, 1 � y c l:lct 1 nt e � c ell � � lat t�r 1ng n is ~
o. 129 - 11 - I a 1 � who t &tifi that , if it er tru that .. - a :regi t red, t yb k 1 ina b ly tran act1 s 1n th fer d t~ h ar, includin l te 1944, and a preaerved, -d1 - el.e tt d cord he in ( � � � CTA r e. ).. le the test ny f v. 11 � he th t 11 d �i � inc e1 n � � t ti ni 11 .. h t tit! aeon ly, !t 1 n t i t t \i l r 1 , di n t in eth x:l. t nc e e ti the 11 9 l h fi:t t If') t' t . l 8 nly aft tt t h i nc - nt. f the is y hould h v n 1 t ne � y 1� is f d n � His t f t exist ne t\1 d c r ly ft rt 9 t . Thirdly d l tly, if it 1& tzu t � exists a it l ag ��P ti f pr J:ty that . the �pou��� , they shoul ve 1n :teUna.J:y cours� 485
�1 in � � -l - in ace r danee 1r r~m-..... , th t ia . lt � pe r th \ th pr"'�".... d ac- tbi r ! � usu rue tion iz p:r e 1�-s , pr ee f 1 a ed xelu ac:h of tb the con- tt' ry. j � � evi enc to � ef� f ct zg fti& � id p ��� p rln the t x l e y r 94 � 19 2. t � f ctu � d p ertl�s h 1%' �1 vrya- �� 1t rat! 1t1 th t � 1t h!a th lin 1 �� 1 � u f - 10.. )~ I als & 1 ti � if n ~" ~ 1nd r 1n f (� 10 - � e1 486
� o. 129 - 13- byth a nt fo~ .in h l of Utioner and not his if ' n al r-t 11 oecaeiona th r eds of uch 1s - d osit d in p i tl er� curr nt ec ln th hil!p in tion 1 in nil 5� - - c. ).t �� n. : - � 1~. � 1 r t nc eting of their Ulin ue t ... 1n Xilt c r l e is - t � ~ d� �n ~~r:. � 1 z! e 1 � vin n � � 1th i ern y th rtn � ce, tt t if � � � (1) are null, void and 1- xist ld, n in h t the d r tin nt ri , of th � p ��� t. ' � ' .j t � 487
.. 1 - ri.t 1 nt - .. 1 t en t � � th nt:rdit t� � 1 y titi n r t e hi ct i dn th t th ct1 n n h rn and 1 if 11 � l d t t� s nh hi �1 rei l end ir ct tn � ct th t t h h th t ll 1 nt d nt cl - t1 v b � t 1 it -; r h 1 el y i n 7. 1 0;:" 1 ctly 1 1l r i 488
489
c.r .S�I " � 129 - 1 ... n / " c n e tl t t � ttr n nd n n J.n r t - � 11 t v l i ity f the 1 th 1 , citin Co � v. f rl t th t ft ct r in fa f t x tt n, i 490
� 129 - . . - - .)7 � � �� 5 ' g. ..., 19 � � t 1& � l t X nd ;ur- � ici c Ch h r:r ctl d v 11 ly d � p ct t th tt c l ct f y f r hi 1- 1 � 0 not n nt cti ynt c � ti r d s v. Collect r .n � � � � 10, 1I 1c � c 1. ofl � � 1 � 19 � d. � � � Jul 3 ' 19 �� � v. � nt. v �� .27, 9 � � � � � -1 71 � ) i ' c: � k fr f t � fU%'- r . ird rf 19 2. ) 1 rt ci tin t� n r r fl91
� 29 -1 � p ent t t1t1 f r iew c t 1 � ti c cem he � �� t 1t 1� hea ~ t incr as rt y evidence~cit- ��� nt , .... t in c 11. Int. v. B t ng � T~ n jti ./xt J n. o , 195 Co. , � � � in y lle 1 1 n l unte :r ... � r fi - 1 r re ft the te r ns t� f t ct Oint . th l ave'\ 1 ci. th lty, th t th � � t �' ully d 1 dy r dnt rin t � 492
c.t 1. -1 - end cy of 'the ea � in hi offiee. Th ~ nee t f f n ure u of nternal v ue ich evi the o inJ. n , nd qu �� � roc s on nt d th p nalty a el1rd.net d f~ fi l ~a,�nu~:.at hlch 1 th ubj ct th1� 1. Th deeis1cn led f s.s he by ffi � exc t w1th eapect t the d .oo a ll d co ro p titicner. ct t t f ud �na ty in th nd 493
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. AG COUNSELORS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2607)
- HEDCOR, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1733)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. OCEANAGOLD (PHILIPPINES) INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 2780)
- TRANSFIELD PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7842)
- CTA Case No. 2075 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2075)
- LKY PROPERTY HOLDINGS, INC. represented by Ms. REBECCA MARIE ABIGAIL G. LEE v. THE HONORABLE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10754)
- SAN MIGUEL BREWERY INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1772)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PETRON CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2828)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.