CTA Case No. 685 (Decision)
�J I LLI n�,t~~c 1\1 \~~1r f �5 , -- - - ....... - Jf 94 '
.1� o. 6 5 - 2- in rt5 c p 1 0 r1 ' Oc 1 J.n onn .h o" t l. u ar , t.. t:J.1 bn -d t 1 or 1 1 ua con- ta1n r or 1 0 c t j UfJ ' a 11 Q .. it r 1 r. rJ o Ju y 2fl 1959, .t ion r 1d _nt o 80 2 � c .. 0 u .r t rl or r 1 por t0 CO; ) ".1.. .x on c . 1 - t n t ' tb p tl tit. .r Coll ctor of C 0 l 11 I� ' to r. t u r l0 t �Jti t ti g. 1 th th 1 1 ,r X 1� ' in .,... ~ t ltion t p 1 on or T' V~t:; 0 "'h 0 tl odn the a .. 1 hich n 1t r 0 6 t 9'-rCJ � 79 fl _ i~.... ; '1 co n I 11 in t r in t Iloil �d, i.t f t, t oll c or r nd th l � f 13, 7 . ;9 y 1 1 h 95
;� 9 6
c �CIcI ... 6' - -... c. t d - th t t Coll c r 0c lt of' r Oll ' 1 ct ti� ion t co or ur p 1o r 0 on t ' p r ., ) o, ?3 � 3 ( 0 n ich 0 t n � lai a fo r r 11 i Coll ctor Cu 0 11o' � ( � 1. con 1t1on tor 1 w, P� 1 -2 9, c c.) 0 ... - oth r n -' th r po 1 t tt con a t1on. t' ht h oll of' lo .lo, on 10 t r � 1 to eoll ct th oorr ot n nt or t X 1 fQ t t1- t 0h d 1 n in t on � In r' hr 1 fro th ' e1 cy ,., no s 1 th 0 2 ,- .1 3 ( r. 0 n r, p . 21 1 t c r c.) r n h c t n1n p t1 io r r1 orio 1 ceo d e tb 1 � ,, 97
.. D'CISIO c 5 -5- dv nc 1 t X c r t�.nt 1 01 b :n coll ct th Coll tor f 0 llo lo u d 1.Q3( ) i n x�el� ... � to "' c io 1 0 X0 1n t d of th co 1 ~ c ...on 190 0 t h ntl ).1 nd � n �~ n t ~ 1 04-c lc 4 � I j e im o t ur c f ..r tor � nt \ t r jc r\ cl � ! .c . � r of lnt , � � 1,/one 1961.) a b� L impo v Xt �n.or � cust_d i" no lo jt;ct to for 0 ol 1 ir- p ta � old c .. r (I' n 0 .. - 0 lw th� n t.l v l .. leas of tu h .. 00 � ~. 11'727 .(;. t 0 1~. , ' � � � .1; 195 55 cl r . to oth ,, 9._ 8 �� �
�6' -. - I / 0 1. 0 on t 3( u) 1 t nd 1( 5) t 11 � ., ctl n o in prr ~ o lo .
.. 6 5 .. 7 - s cona �~.II;��""' t1t1on to~� R \ti n expr 1 ly r pondent 1n p ra r ph 5 ot bi a S concl � nd r, n r t t by t r � ond t 1 p r ~~- h 11 ll in � his ou te.r<:la 1n qu t o , 1 not ll d nc " al tax on port artiel s� in - uch s th id � rticl re 1 po te not tor 1 to other persons, but r � ly forth xclusi � u e by tb p t1t1o .er. or r, to old oth vi and su c h . p t1 on r to tb �*p r t x on s 1 � � � t would nd r inv lid nd of o err et .th pro 1- ai ns or ~. etion 190 of th Ta,x Cod wh1eh d� itte ly X pt th titioner her 1 from the p of x. It sh ul not d tba b purpo 0 th co n ti i to pl ee per ons pnrcl 1 . ood fro 1r ( �oing usin s in the . 1lipp1ne on an Q.U 1 f oting, for t x purpo , with ho who pur� good dir etly from witbo t he lip in � .(P nay Elee ric Co. v � Cell ctor or l.ot rn l e- venu , G. � o. 6?5'3 1 July 30, 1955') In o her rd , n ati tax 1s ort of ' quallz o 1 e c su l port r , 10 0
l: (,~ . .... on qt! 1 :fo .ti t; (!_ t 11 ro nts -r,t~}"IC PY ... 1 t . x on 1 1 !l 1mpo t d. / Jli< VS c..~11 0 o.r of I:> �I' � ..,.,_ 1-.1. J... �� ..I � )(., 1961) "' � . . y th � (�. In eff t. tt.~. "'P nsat1. t.ii:X is l v1 d. , asses d t. n coll ot t tl~ }'l:.tO 0 th d nc I sale ax on 1 po ted ;.rt1ol ~ !i.i-cl r not or s l , b t fo rh1lip in � propri tor r h r o.� � tt: tit1o.;. t: a or cp I'ato of s ga1� c~nt.r� l in Victor! , }i g bJ c 0 t u.r r s o 11 r' rc t~g t x pr c 1b d in ~ otio 1 9 of the T - Ccd '� Cons u ntly, tho p titione 1 :X t 0 tl "'Sa nt of .. t. f�p rc t�� 1 8(d) of t' �.ra D follow t X � (d) .tiel , ubj t to t und r tion on hu.ndrod �1 ty... ninG of t la Code. " hi our can judici l not c of t ract t th rtc or m rk t lu.e or 1ncl d th al of t , C!lJ r o: s b cm.1 101
�� ho 0 1 p o- rS c t 1. r h fo o"ng c i 1o t .' , c >/ tori 0 ~1~11 Inc. i 1r X "'rc � d. ~ t ~. d- te on g ~.-port tiona for t ow or c r g�~ ccnv l' i on n 'U ~tc1.�j "'1~ on � , 1n , t. p 1o tro r 11 t ~' tc ly o, on ~. ~�nA(, .t I0 t rn 1 :1s h .r �.by 0 . r Ci. tc ?> t t1 1 t lo t1 0 66, ~ �'l'J ' .rltho� t :... t r 0 � 0 co � 10 2
More in CTA Decisions
- PHILIPPINE MINING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and THE OIC-ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, LARGE TAXPAYERS SERVICE, in their official capacities as officers of the Bureau of Internal Revenue(CTA Case No. 9292)
- CTA Case No. 4426 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4426)
- AIG SHARED SERVICES CORPORATION (PHILIPPINES) [FORMERLY: CHARTIS TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (PHILIPPINES)] v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9438)
- CALUMPIT WATER DISTRICT v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9493)
- NIPPON EXPRESS PHILIPPINES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10489)
- CTA Case No. 4001 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4001)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CHEVRON HOLDINGS, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 1950)
- CTA Case No. 2715 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2715)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.