CTA Case No. 267 (Decision)
ft...U -Ill� PlllPPl~RJ UJlJH! 1 APJ)EAI...S MA:-o!U .~............ 3 ... PH , et1t1oner, - � rsus - C. T. � � SE � 267 � 31 L , in b a .t. . � 15 pac1tr �� ollector of � T� � 16 tern� eve ue , espon ent. X� � ~ - � � � � � - � ~ - k A r J E ' et1t1oner, - versus - L. � LA , 1 his eapac1tr aa ollector 0 Intern� � evenue , - - - - - - esponden � . - . - - ~ - �etltloner, � versus - ~ ' 1 11 c pacitr �� ollector of terna evenue, espo~dent. X- � ~ � � � ~ - - � � � � X EPH , et t:l er, - sus - his of X- � ~ � � � � ~ � � - � � X he ve-entitle cases ere heard jointly - fore this ~ourt. The facts and eire stances , as 11 aa the issue volved �therein , eing � lar nd Ln- terrelated with e ch ot r, hall dete in t a e jointly. 160 lyl
1 - c. r. 267, 31-4. - 2- These are petttlon� for the review of the d�� c1s1 ns of re pon �nt Co11 ctor of lntel"nal evenue �sseaslng against and de and1n fr eac of the above petitioners, yeua net 1n the nts 1nd1cated h reundar' A 0\lOt LaJar\ls Joseph 1~5 12 , 067. ~ .Lazarus Jo epb 19<46 87,521.63 Al ert Joseph 1946 32,814. 32 orge J'oseph 1946 26 , 896.6 John Joseph 19 6 31, 932.32 Petitioner Lazarus Jo..ph filed his 1nco � tax returns f r the y ars 1945 an 1946 on f bruary lB, 1 46 Apr il l , 1947. respectively. P t1t1oners 1 art Joseph and John Joaepb f~led t h ir l nc t a x returns for the ye r 1946 on April 1 , 1947. Pet1- 1oner orge l osep who waa then n th Un ted tatea, did not file his co x ~�turn s f tl y r 1946, which should b&ve been. filed on or efore arc h 1, 1 47. nee, an examiner of t � eau of ntern 1 evenut prepared an fUed for hilll an .1ne t x r - turn for t sal year. Af t er an 1n at! atton of the respect1v 1neo e and ded ctions of each of th petition r herein, and th 1r corros on 1ng �nco t x liabi l 1tiea ccordingly dete~ ined, respondent, on August 19 , 1947, assessed against and cl ded fro th th pa ant of th a inco � tax deficiencies. Ho ever, on epte r 10 , 1947, pet1- 161 lfo
- ......... I � C� � A. ... S � 267. 314, 315 316 - 3- t1 nera ested f r a e1nveat1ga 1 n of the �� e ts que tio � lc re eats �~� r nt d y respon nt. a a1 too 6 nd I, 19~1, r espondent tru. nc ach of t1t1on r� f ~ t e a nt of nt1 r v o � y 1asued against the plus terest p to tober 1~ . 1. 1- tan oualy, respo ent ala iatu d r nts traint and 1 vy a; 1n t propert1 s of p lt onus. ver , by letters all dated to r 16, 1 ~~. etl- tionert LaJarua Joseph , Al rt Josep and John Joseph, re ested for t suspe s1on of th su collec- ion o the e tax assessed a1nst t e , llegln that t etr cas 1 are at111 � ding reinvestigation. Later, y etters all ated to r 17, 1951, tl- t~o ers 1nfo ed respondent of thelr wner f c r- t shar toe p ic ey cia re uf lc ent t a.rante of t 1r spute co � tax 11 11 tie � t info ation furn1 d by t1- tionera t eir letter� of to 17, 1951, respon- ent on the a day, address d waxrant o n s - ent to Joseph oa., � � arn1sh1n h f stoc in ald corporation r�g1stered 1n th n of ch of t � it oners. owever , on � ruary 6, 195 , petl� of garnla ent , an requested furt er fo sti� gat1 n of the entire atter. g ln, reapon nt or r 162
- .T.A. CAS � 2 7, 4, l Sl6 -- t re t l ft� �� a l.t.a 1 � ug � the warra t� 0 garn1s nt on pet1� tio er ' s ares o s oc~ o eph ~os . , �� �� r� serve on to 1' l � l 51, no urt er ct1on �� taken hereon nt11 August 22, 9:>~. en asK for the transfer o t e garnls ed c r o at ck to t n e t n e n 1 v n e. c:e er , 1 55, et t1onera t re pon- ent t at hla right to collect, ei r y 1stra nt nd levy or ju 1c1 1 ctlon, t e � tax sses tl stto h s alrea � r estec1 that t � id asse e� nts it a � .1 nuary 1 , 19 ' tition r n ur e t � ax ass �� galnst eac of t wlth t th t 1 th y fail to pay t a ess- ta en a a1nst th w1th- �� � ��� t �forat pu 1 c auct y 7, 19 � v :r, f 1' l c of seh duled sa � 1 . not t � place. ence, res o en � vert d again �� t � a sh of st.x or 1 c auct 1� Jun 26, 19o � g in; no iddera appeared. ncl for the third tiiH' respon � t e-advertls d t 1 at 163 1~1
DECISI - c. r. � CASES � 267. ....1 ' 1 16 - public uction of the a e s. r of stock to tak pl c: on ugust � 19~ � Inas ch a there w s no bi d r t this th &e led � le , asp ent ur- ch sed sh $toe for t ov r ent for ...h v r book valu the s r of &t c h ���� The only estlon ln this ca � is r or no th sale o petit on r � shares of at n t 30, 1 ~ 1s 1 al d v 11 ? e find that in t e stant case, all nco tax eh ar n r g rn1sh1n t1t1 n r � ah ras f s oc vd only on to r , 1 1, r ort th n 'r aft r th v n f 1 d. 11 � ttl d t.1:n t a provis1 ns of s et on 1 d) of the r c , th Collect r of Internal ev nue h a po to coll ct y tr tv tho ny inco t X nt 0 r1o t ld v ""\ r t rns v Vtie l l g lodj ( oll ctor of Inte... n 1 h11. 5!>4; olleetor of Intern 1 v� h1.1. 5 �' Ju n la Vii\ vs� 1 d � 65 P 11. 2 2f Coll ctor of Int r 1 v nu v � Av 11no et 1. , G. � � L-9 2, �ov. 19, 1 Coll ctor of Int nu va. ur lio P. al. , G�� o. L- 5 , n. 1,19~7; Coll ctor of In- t rn l ven e � Jos c. Z lu ta, 53 O. G. 32; 164 13
- 6- ch: no hua Joy vs. llector of nt r al ev nue , .4. � � L-10961 , � 2 � 1 5 .) T ac of t1e rev nu aut orities in viola� tion of � id et n 51 (d) ould 11 al � t e:refor , the rran' of t nvol in i)$ ra ard petit ne � ' sha.r k n issue c tr v to 1 w, f r an nee s or1lv oll s t at espo lly ac 1r d control ove:r 1 n rs� of t c st � l 56 an nt 1 1 tb r in f vor o t e over !!l n s 1 e 1 � nul end v 1 � y ver , 41$ to t ll ~ c ~ a jud cial ct on 0 11 ct t l' ch ju lc 1 e 6 not y t not t t l t c se~ rr t s o rt y petit r fo... 1e 1 n pp l � 1 56, n :r ond nt f11 n � r to th rc f rr n t~rc 1 ' 1957. t _$ t r ht t t t of l inst on of th c re th n f1v rs l u t i.-.. rc � r of ay a , ,} 2 of coil ct -on rt 1 � v r, n 1- ci l proe e tQS for coll t on of th �- n d ) y ars af t s- nt t reof. o a qu tly, the collee dGf c1ency t s nt from p ..i 0 rs is ~lre dy b r r d b th s atute of ltmit t~ons and 165
C ;)! -CT.A. CAS S � 267, 14, 15 316 herefor pursuant to ect1on 14 of public Act ~o. 112 , t ro is nod f c1cncy in r ~P ct to such tax. I v OF T � EGO .. c IDE � he d cision of r po d~nt 1 here y v rs � !he 1 of t1tloner � shares of toe in Jo h ro ., I c� t the ov rn nt n A u t 30, 1956, 1 r by d - c larod n 11 nd void, nd r!! pondent 1 h r v ord r d t o r turn th 1d h r of tock to p t1 1o rs. It is f urth r d c red that ther is no fi- c1 ncy nco o t due le y petition r L z ru Jo e h fo th y rs 4 nd 1 46 nd p tition rs Alb rt o p , or o ph nd Joh J ~ ph or h y ar 1946. 0 O~E D� �anlla , Ph 1pp1n s , Aprll 15, 1 � ~c i;/' {/,f d�.-~ ~ v~� 11 6 G. JC./'Io� L..-/cf()J~1 ~---~ � � 01 t t�r
More in CTA Decisions
- IRENE C. SALUD v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 412)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FINANCIAL TIMES ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2468)
- SUB-SEE PHILIPPINES INC., and NORTHERN ORIENTAL SHIPPING, LTD., v. HON. REY LEONARDO B. GUERRERO, in his official capacity as COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, and ATTY. ELVIRA CRUZ, in her capacity as DISTRICT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, PORT OF CEBU(CTA Case No. 10102)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. STRADCOM CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1949)
- HEDCOR SIBULAN, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 798)
- INTERVET PHILIPPINES, INC. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9909)
- PHILEX MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 728)
- BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. REGIONAL TRIAL COURT - BRANCH 16 DAVAO CITY, DIAMONDZ MOTORS CORPORATION/PRESIDENT MARIA CHULA SISON (formerly UDK-SP 050)(CTA Case No. SCA-0026)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.