SEC Adm. Case No. 05-08-130 Felipe Judan
Securities and Exchange Commission SEC Bidg. EDSA, Greenhills, Mandaluyong City Department of Trade and Industry Republic of the Philippines
FELIPE JUDAN, Petitioner.
versus- SEC En Banc Case No. 05-08-130
AFP-RETIREMENT AND SEPARATION OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL GOLD CLUB, INC. BENEFITS SYSTEM, and RIVIERA
Respondents
X
RESOLUTIOn
Urgent Prayer for Issuance of a Writ of Temporary Restraining Order or a Writ of the Office of the General Counsel ('OGC'? of the Commission. Preliminary Injunction to annul and deciare as void the Order dated 29 April 2008 of For consideration of the Commission En Banc is a Petition for Certiorari With
filed a petition with the Commission praying that it be authorized to call a special stockholders' meeting of the Riviera Golf Club, Inc. (`Riviera'?. Finding the petition set of directors on 16 May 2008. meritorious the OGc issued the 29 April 2008 Order directing the officers and directors of Riviera to hold the annual stockholders' meeting and election of its new As a brief background, the AFP-Retirement and Separation Benefits System
On 16 May 2008, the petitioner filed the instant petition alleging that the OGC issued the subject order without or in excess of its jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion, and further alieged that there is no plain, speedy or adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.
The petition is unmeritorious.
the calling of the meeting of Riviera's stockholders. Under the 2006 Rules of There is no questior that the OGC issued a final judgment on the petition for
Procedure of the :Commission, the proper remedy is an appeal from the questioned order.1 Such remedy is available to the petitioner but he did not avail of the same.
1 Rule XI- Appeals from Decisions or Orders of Operating Departments
http:/www.sec.gov.ph "Sec. 11-1. Ordinary Appeal. -- An anpeal to the Commission En Banc may be taken from a decision, order, or resolution issued by an Operating Department if there are questions of fact, of Ilaw, or mixed questions of fact and law." +(632) 584 0923
and Riviera Golf Club, Inc. Felipe Judan ys. Office c AFP-Retirement and Separation Benerit System. 35-08- 130 General Counsel. F of
jurisdiction, not errors of judgment.? Thus, the instant petition must fail. the Supreme Court, a certioiari is a remedy designed for the correction of errors of Instead, the petitioner filed the instant petition for certiorari. As explained by
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED DUE COURSE for iack of merit
So orderEd.
Mandaluyong City, 20 May 2010.
Fe B. Barin Chairperson
MA. JOANITAE. CUEL Commis sioner RAuL J. PALABRIC Commissioner
ManUELI JBERtO B. GAItE ElAdio m/jala)
Commissioner Commissioner
casEs1 o a0ot.0o
*on leave
2 Madrigal Transport, Inc. vs. Lapanday Hoidings Corporation, et al., G.R. No. 156067, August 11, 2004.
More in SEC Commission En Banc Decisions
- SEC Adm. Case No. 12-09-183 Uniwide Sales, Inc., et al.vs. The Hearing Panel in SEC Case No. 06-99-6340 and In the matter of the Petition for Declaration of Suspencion of Payment, Formation and Appointment of a Rehabilitation Receiver/Committee and Approval of Rehabilitation Plan, Uniwide Sales, Inc., et al.(SEC Case No. 06-99-6340)
- SEC Admin Case No. 09-12-160 In the matter of Doncil Finance Corporation(SEC Admin Case No. 09-12-160)
- SEC En Banc Case No. 07-15-378 Carlos Palanca IV, Appellant, - versus - RCBC Securities, Inc., Appellee.(SEC En Banc Case No. 07-15-378)
- SEC En Banc Case No. 09-13-301 Appeal filed on 19 September 2013, by GENTRI DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER, INC. (Respondent-Appelant) under Rule XI of the 2006 Rules of PRocedures of the Securities and Exchange Commission assailing the Decision of the Office of the General Counsel (OGC)(SEC En Banc Case No. 09-13-301)
- SEC Adm. Case No. 01-09-103 Min & Family Global, Inc.(SEC Adm. Case No. 01-09-103 Min & Family Global, Inc.)
- SEC En Banc Case No. 08-13-299 Puregold Construction and Development Corporations Appellant, - versus - Puregold Price Club, Inc. Appellee.(SEC En Banc Case No. 08-13-299)
- SEC En Banc Case No. 02-15-345SOUTHEAST ASIAN MEDICAL CENTER vs SOUTHEAST ASIAN MEDICAL SPECIALIST(SEAMSI), INC.(SEC En Banc Case No. 02-15-345SOUTHEAST)
- SEC En Banc Case No. 08-17-429 In re: Urgent petition for the issuance of a take over order pursuant to Article X Section 8 and 9 of the CMIC rules, in relation to rule 33.1(D)2 of the 2015 IRR of the securities regulation code, against DW Capital, Inc. Capital Markets Integrity Corporation, Petitioner.(SEC En Banc Case No. 08-17-429)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.