CTA Case No. 1178 (Decision)
} P THl!: I" HIL.l.l",., , r.A.� L! ~ .> 1\l!W. o. ... !' rf Qi nI p '� l� �<' -. .r ('l ~ f ' 0 3 1- 1 t t; 'l, . t t ' .. Iii yr tt ... � � ec 0 11 ..,.. pt 1 , 07 ' fl' � ,5 to n in ic ' - n c pl y0 1 tt r T' t. r n t~ t r Yl ' only or t l' 115
� l7 .... . ... l .�.. 1, ' t 1- ' � , ' t � � � t: - �' t !� 1 16
.. ' ' c - 7 1 t or � rt l' 117
-.. ? 1 .... �� 1 t 59 f' ---7~~~--------------~~ t o f' �� . l .. .'� t ' ' 1' 118
... !1 - t , !' 119
� 17 - ... ti t 0 t ' � r ' � �t 0 h ' � ' .) 0 � �� ~c . 9, f.' 1 n l 1 . ,. l 0 I. �a ( "' 1 1 0 ) '0 .!t 120
� 17 tl -7 .J ' t t � ' l' � ~� .L j' 1 2 1
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 3069 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3069)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MT. BLANC MOTORS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1667)
- CTA Case No. 6434 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6434)
- CTA Case No. 1347 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1347)
- PHILEX MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7115)
- METRO RAIL TRANSIT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9651)
- CTA Case No. 6761 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6761)
- CTA Case No. 551 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 551)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.