CTA Case No. 3486 (Decision)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS -CKJEZCJN CITY CHINA BANKING CORPORATION~ F'F�' �1-. .i.. t .i.�:�> n C' r. ~ \.'F r ��:�:; :.. \ �::�. C. T.A. CASE NO . 3486 THE COMMI SS IONER OF INTERNAL r:;:EVE t\IU E , DE C I S I 0 N r h t�:� qu.c �;:; t�. :i.. o n of t h R ~mou n t of �fnt.. the .:..,_ d 'l ;�,. n c: E' d b y :i.ri t �.f..' I' �<'�:!�;j �I.�.P el :i. n h a v :i.n CJ t ..i.. t l ~~ o f th E~ p r �o p E.~ r.. t �. ';/ 1�: Ul 'l <;:;(�' 1 :i.. (:1i':1. i".E1d :i.. l"l i t s n a m e~ ~ s t h e t ax p a id i l le g a l l y a~sess e d
DEC I ~:; I ON CTA CASE NO. 3486 2 by c l'" ~"c'Ci .i t:. nr��.... () �f (no~.! ~~ f0 ( :: t ..i.CJ I""I :~: !J :=:: ) oi' th e t�J .::J. -1:. �' �o n i�:\.l I n t .c:> t'� rJ .,:.�:. l F~: c'\'f:~ n u.F' r.:u cl c'"=' c1n I:JD.�:o: .i.. ::; of p1 "F'::;c: l �l t .c?c:l .:,1. r��r? : 1 (;.~ q i:l. 1 �':).q F' ~ L. .i. l"l g �'=" r 1 c1 c! r:.0 l F' 5. 1 ,,,,.. f:) -1:.. 1�� F'f:~ t. :� t�1::.l. r"l .i. 1 :-.1. :� c~ :; L'C 1..\ I.:C'! d ( E :-:hi. h .i. t. "t'1") �i. n "f i.\ \'CI I��� Cl "f pc t. .i. -1:. .i..() l "l ( �:~ r�� Cl\'C' I"" i1 f:Jc:\ 1��� c E' J C) �f J <'~. 1 �1 d ~ u f T i.. l:. l c No. 1�.1 "1.1<::01~� (E�~ ::Il:i.b.i.t "D'') c>f t lv :� F{e qi''> t~r- n r :l �f f�c (�! ( :!~::; fur � t J�H.-:�.� F' r� C:J\:' .i.n c C:' u �f Riz 0 l to s ecure the r' :�1.'y" inr:~r l 1.. �:' f �i.:.J�1c .i. n d ~ 'b "i.:F' <In r~�,:; �=�� of tho Sd.i.rl mortgagor ( pp H ~:~ ~� � TSN of 10 - 16 - 85); ..'''_\ The�~ �;:; a . .i.d mc1 r� t�.q �'�'�go i'". .in .:: " p ..:C:l.).' ill f-:: 1"11:�. h:i.::; nhl .i.qi:\ t .io n c:; t.o I:.h e p t) t.i ti.Df1fC>t"" Co n se qu e ntly, th e �:::; ;:,,.i..d pi �upct �� t�/ (~ :: t.r� t�\ .:i t.f. d �( c :.i.. ,::1 J. l '>' hy n '' ) U. pon pP t . :i. t:.j_ Url (E .:�~ i�l .i . h :i. t ,, i"J f 3C3
DE C I S ION CTA CASE NO. 3486 petitione r herei n , �for� ~ppro pri a t e Certifi ca te of S~ l e (Exhibit , ".."....)".7 ;;;~ n d .:l.n n u t.i:\ t .c-:d / r (;:q i ::; -1- .r:�! r �c:-~ d o n T. f'' T.. i') o. r-.1� -- .l. J OJ 5 ( E :< hi b :i. t IJ II II ) June 6, 1 979 as En try No. 40198 /T-No . �-..:;� ' pi �� up.::~ r �1.-.y ~-~:i t .h .i.n to t .hc:� ( .1 ) f r om Jun e 6, 1979, t�. h e ::.;~ :i. d pr opE' r � t .y lt�! iOl. ''..> c:u n <::>o l .id<:~ �i.:. c::!d .i. n t. hc~ n c.~. rne o f t h e-;� h e~ I''E! in 'IE" <:J. nd " F " ) n1 �1 .July 1 7, :.1. 900 .. l ate July or ear l y to t.he L: I..I. I 'Ei.':\ 1..\ u'f' ~Jul y 9, :1. 970 ( F::: l�l.i.. hi 1�. , ,..,II) by 'Bih: D.C." Office N --�I.J.OB 56 ( E :< h .i b :i.. t. \It:; II ) in t: l�l,::: f'li:.\!Tl E-) o'f t h ;:' p E�t .i. t.i.o n f:.!l.-� (pp . .1.1 �-.. 14~ TSN o f October 16 , :1.985); q u~G ,
DECI~3ION ����� CTA CASE NO . 34 86 -� 4 - 11 ., F' f-? t .i. t. .i. D n t:::~ r � ' ~; man a C:J E~ t-� :::; c h E~ c: k ( E :-: h i b i. t H 11 11 ) which was used as payment for the capita l gains tax 0 nd which was issu~d by petitioner on the ba s is or �3 1::. ;� (-~I l CJ -J:: h Ci f ( r:: :< h .i. b i. t . I II II ) d ated July 9, 1980 r� ,.::�c c� .i vt:-~ cl hy Que~on City as shown ����! i t 1�1 t �. he:� i t rlr:::�po�::;i t.E�?cl 1-?.c:l. n 1:: ( F ~-: hi b.i. t '1 H ---::=~ 11 ) - �.:. F' hi 1 :.i.. p p :i. n c~� N:.,\ t :i.()I ., ;,1_). (pp . 15-19 , TSN of October 16, 1985); pt:~t:i. t.i.. c::ol �l '? l .. 1 n �=;; t 5.�::; "">t.t.s d by -1.-. hE� Uu r �p ,-:l.t.t of In t.e r �� n <':\ l F\f=' VE'rlUE�~ n f U�..t. F! ;:-~ o rl C .i. t-.�/ i�~ nd despite diligent effor t s, th e "'�.::Ifni�:-:� Ci :!t...t l i:l nut. he �fuunc:l. (pp. 19-20, 27, lSN of fJ~::: t.~ iJ h >:�? ,... j_ (:,' lCJn:=:i; PP� 10, TSN of Jan. 28, hol c:l of a. co p y of F\evE�? nUi"! Memorandum Order No . 33-�8 1 d ated No ve mber 19, 1981 (F::hi hit 11 �.:1") express ly pro viding th at t h e pa y men t Clf Ci-.l.pi t <~ l on conso l idation of property arj_si nq from ex trajud icia l f oreclosure exc lusive l y
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3486 - 5- the debtor - mortgagor a nd nut on the~ creditor-mortgagee (pp. J. LJ. ���� .l ;_:,, , De: tu hf�:! l-� .�.I\.../.._.. :1..90::)); !3 u.b~5E?qUi.:.' n t 1 ''/ ~ pr:::'t..i. i:".io1�1er-� on c!une ,.., ' I �..::.~:. !'i the office of the ,~r:.-?~:; p on d e rl t �. ""� f o r�� rn i:\ l demand or c l a im for r��r:!fund of the payment of the (pp. 21, 22-23, TSN of October 1 6, 1985); 0 res p o~dent failed t o takE~ a n y �.�./ n petitioner 's c l ai m CJ"f' t h f:? t .h E! C:dp .i. "\:.<:.\ J. (F:-: h i h i 1.:. II ~::: II ) !f pF'!t.i. t:i..one r� o 1�1 ."J u J. y 6, filer:! the-? .i.nst <,, nt p.:=0t.i. t:i.on '.-�Ji 1:.-. h thi s Honorab l e Court (pp. 23-2 4, TSN of Octobe r 16, 1985); 9. Du r ing t h e ttial on t h e me rit s, p e ti tio n e r p resented t wo witnesses .in tht:'! per��~; on~:; of Atty. Dm<"'r � D. ') i.: 1 �.i.. :t. i .;:\ , i (.)�o:;~; ~;,tan t C h :i.e f L e g <::l. J. Cuu n se J. o �f pe tition er an d Mr . Hil ario Garc ia, Junior Cler k in t.: h E1 I....E:' (]<::l. l pE�? t".i t i. onE' t-�, v~ h o both the var i o u s d oc umenta r y evidence presented dur i ng the trial. defen ses ,
- ..... DEC I SION CTA CASE NO . 3486 - 6 -- t�.l c~ 1 !. ��� � <;::.r;~ t t.l F:.' d :!..<.; c: or1 c_; t r�� uf.0d ~; -1::. r-ic t 1'/ c:\q a. j _n ~; t. t. hf'~ in ta:-: J n .,:~n action for refund, the taxpayer has the C: U J. J. E'C t.c~d i':\n cl f "''�.i. 1 u r��E� to do so fatal to sa id action for refund; J t . i ~; .i. rl C: I..trn bE;~n t Lt po1�1 petitioner to show that it. il <.�,�::;; c:ompl f~c:l >�~ .i.th 1:-.h i::�.' pr��uvi �=.:;ion�=.; of s(;~C:tions ::~9::~ National Jnterna l J.c1 77 ~ a c,:; .:.;~mf"flclr; ~d; In a n t-�p fund ~ t 1�1p dE:\ t.e cJ f pc:\ yrnc:~n t exactitude and failure to do �: c:r:J .:i.. �,::. �r <�:1. t <�:'.1 t .o <:;c:\ i d c 1 a .i. rn fur�� r��E' fund ; 1..�.1.i.. t huu t. <J.dmi tt.i.nq, that: .in CU I �\ �:=:; u 1. i cl d t-.i Orl LJ �f frurn extrajudicial liability fur the payment of t:hr::? r:: i�:\ p 5. l .i~. 1 q d .i n ~::; u n the debtor- mortgagor, hO\A.If::'VE'r��� ~� ":5<3. .i.d l.i. <::\h.i. 1 i ty m<'J.Y va lidly he shifted to an d a ssumed by th~ creditor-mortgagee, as i t is the ir1 h.:::~v i ng pnJper�� t.y consolidated in its name; - ..
DECISION CTA CASE NO. 3486 -- 7 - t h i':\ t t l'iE' ca pit a l ga1n s tax .i.. n t ( j l...\ f:~' �;; i u r1 b y p e t ..it .i.. (}n c-? r. ( c t'e d .i. to,. -.... ff'ICJ!"' t~ q t:l. fJ C.'P) i:.h e P"' .i r:l in E:\C::C::Ot""d t1. 1'1CE� \�~i. t.h J.~s a. waiver of hi s rig h t to c J. i:\ .i. m t. hr �:~ r �F~ �f ur1 d f t"�o rn t"'E'<::; pnn c1 r-~ n t . F' r-:-?t..i. t . .i..f:)l"l('~ '-- <::~ n c:: fl CJI"'':; �for � l'" l;? fund on Or"d-21' ' l\lo. 33- 8 1 d a ted No ve mb e r -1:: 1�1r-:-:� -1::. h :i.. r-ei p i:.\.I' ' .::\c_:) r- :D. p 11 t h r:> ,.�� c,~o f ~= t <:\ t .E�)''" : "J t \'li J 1 bf'! noi.._f:2 d t h <1 t. Ltnd e t-� th e fo r�f:�) IJO :i.n (_J t .1�� ,').!"l ~:;<:JC: t ..i. cwr ; -!.-.I'll:�) c:: .=:~. . p ita l q ~3 i n <::; 'l.. ,'.l.)< j _s:; [ 1<:'. Y �''' h 1 r-,:! h y -i.:. l l f�:~ d eb to ,.....��� rno t... t:c:.l a rJ o ,.- h r:.:c<..l. r..rs r:�� .i. t i �::; I.:'. h e p <H� ty nunna. l l y 1� -.!,'-~ 1 .i. zing -1-:. l�l r-2 in c: urnr.-:-' un ,:,,.c: c ou r�1�i-. u 'f th e <:;;::~ l !? o I"' di s pu s j t i .o n of the c::a p:i. ta l asset. S u c::h i. ,., r::n rn r-:.� .i.. <�; t �c' <J. l :.i.. ;�-: (:~ c:l .i. f t h r' p r-r �>c: PE�cl �::. o f t h r::� 1 c> <:.\r 1 i'' :-; (�: r�:�~ f�'L1 t l� lf:~ c:: us '1.:. o 'f t hr? p ;' �o pe,. - t )i nH JF"I:.r.;_:)i':l. �.,_:p :~d.. {)JFJ it. :i_<;:; pr.. r:~~;; r. :r. rn t\b l y fur � t h i s q i:) :.i. n d.-: � ;� :i. v c-:' ci t. h ,:J t t:. l�tr� rn u ,,. �l.�_ q aq o I' �.... d i:-~ I:Jto,... d j _cl 11 r�>t . J:�k'. ')' -t- h e~ 1 u ,�). l"l dl"l y rno 1��"E~ .,:~n d <:~ 1 1. U\�J F~ d t h e f( �q �r--'r:-: l u �:3 r..r.;�. ��::�' uf hi �::; prop c�! I��"Ly; .?.nc l h r.-~ rJj .d !"lrJ i. . .:,~. J <:n IJ rJ I:. I"JE~ ''" t:. u f .i.. J e::� t h e� l''f'? t t.r. t-� n E:\nd p c:l'/ t .h r:-~ t :-J :: f o !' ~:; r...r.c h rJ -':.l..i. n � '' l;.) r::-~ f j_ ,.,d nr :1 f'lF'r�:t. .,.._ :.i.. n pr0ti �i:�.:!. onct�� ''" c:<':l.~:;c-?. ( I"'OY.I t ~:; r;.~c:: .i. U l 'l ~? �1- ~; ) 0 �f t. ! r E~ N c\ t. :i.D!"l c:\ 1 I 1"1 t. c-=~ )�"' I '\ c\ J. r-:c~� v r;?n u e Co de , t-. 1�1 (:~ pE�.~ t.. t :.i 11r:-~ 11 t . po r� t: j _on o f r,�Jil :.i.c h r-r:-},'::\ d :.; : ~ec. 292. Re cover y of tax e r roneo u s ly or i ll ega ll y c:o ll ectecl.- No �::::.t .r..i. t o !'" pI'"DC: ec�c:l .i n !J :; h ,:':l. l J. be-:' rna .i n t ,,_j_ n r,>d :i. n <'1f ! }i C: O I.J ,... "1:: f 0 I'. t .h E�? t'" f.-?C: 0 '/E~ t'"Y 0 f a n y 1"1 E~ t ion<::\ 1 i nt.er�n a l revenue tax h ereaf t er alleged to i�t<'!.V t' b Pc:-~n F�r� r.. onr:�ou�:::; l 'i o;�.. i l l f.-? g<J. 1 J. y -co\ 'c3~:;r::;~::. c;; r:-: c:l Dr- C: D 1 1 E~C: tr0 d , 0 t'" ( J �f .:-:\r-l y p E! rl o:\ J. t ''/ c: l d.:i.. m P cl t ..:::> h a.../ P hE!f-2f1 co l l F'Cted \�d . thut.it 3C8
- DECISION CTA CASE NO . 3 486 - 8 -� t\ 1..1."\:.h (:>r �:i. -l::.y!, o r�� of any s um a ll e g ed to ha ve b een excessive o~ i n a n y manne~ w~ongfull y c:: D J J. \-? C: i_-_ E~ r:i !t l...t n t .i 1 a c l a i m fo~ ~ ~f und n~ credi.t has been duly fi l ed with the C (:> rnm :i. <::;~:; :i.. o r-1 c-~ t-� ; but. �;; u.c 1�1 �c:i '...l. it. or�� p ,... u c: ro! ~-? cl in CJ m.:,:~�l he' ma:.i.. nt-.a i.n c d, ~�-Jht::?t tl r::~r�� or�� nu 1:'. <:o LlL h t~x 5 pena l t y, o~ sum ha s be e n p<.:l. :i. d Ltn r:l e t- P''.. otc ~�:::;t oi��� clu. I' � E~ ~;:;�::;. f.lr::l�:c l�- t�..i..n(_;] t�.o the te~m s of th e law, i t i s ve ~ y national i nt e~na l .1. �;:; p 1 ,':l. n ted on t:o n c:!:i.. t:.i.o n t.h;�,,t. t. hP t <.:l. )�: must h ave been e~roneously Oi'' i 11 (7!qi:'\ l l 'f co 1 l (7?C: t e d � Th P �::;ti:'.\tut�.ra F-~ mp 1 o '>,. �;::. t. h r;� hereafter a ll eged to have O t"� i l l CiJ -0::\ l 1 ';' o t�" �..: D 1 1 E'C: I::. eel " ..... nothing lf'IU!'E! .. Tht-? <:IC: c:: :~n t .i. <;; on t. he :i.. l 1 C'] -3. 1 J. y p :1. )-' ~:; D t'.. 1:� :-~- ;.; V�J h .i.. c:: h .i.. �::; t F'�] a. l l. ':/ a nd lawful l y due a.nc:l p a.y<:lh l c t.n th e-? not E::� nt..i.tlE~ d to r �cc: U\/C~ r-y o f i J.J. t-? (] i:':\ lly C: 0 J. l E!C: tf-?ci � Com rn .i.s<:. ion e r- of Int e ~n a l Re ve nu e si mpl y ~efunds taxes which the l a w mu s t not assess o~ C:U 11 f:? C t. He is not. i.:.o t-� c~ �fund ' t <'~ :-:es I�~ hi e h and r� :.i. ghtl y h P lnn q to tl�1e go ve r�nmr.-?nt.� 3Cd
DECISION CTA CASE NO . 3 48 6 - 9 -� ll e r� c:� !' .�i. n petitioner s impl y F' l r,~c 1.-('.:cl t�.u p d 'y' t".h E~ ~�~hic: h l. t:\ lt J"fi. .I. JJ y .,,,_ncl l P qi.'l l l y du e-~ r��E�s pondcnt: Corn rn :i. ~,;~; ion E! t"" o �f for c onsolid~tion o �f i t s t i t l e E� :-~ t. t... <::l_i ud i c i ;-,\ l I �f <:\ C: F't" "t .c.l. :i..1"1 r �F~V fc:�'f"l I.J C hint ~.::; th cl.t s u ch debto r - mortg a gor, ..\.<;c, by �,-,; hou l. d C] <J' .I...I. (Jf�~ c:l by p ,.��ov i ~; :i.em i r-1 th e J. <H'-1 !JC.? r� m;;,\n E' t:o .i. -1:.~3 C h! ).i.. CE'. Bu.t �::; ,_Jr � �~~ l y n o t .i.. t. o r � ili.F~q �3 1J. y i <;;; c: 1 F~-:'!.1 � � If i::~ l 1 t���E! <; ponden t , [:'E~ l :i. i:..i 0 1�1(o~ t��� <:3 h Ut.I. J.d n ' .i ml�1u.r�� <::; E~mc~l l t "f ;� �� �.:m1 1:. h e:� rn u ,... i"JJ iclfJ o r� ���- d E! b tor � ., ti n d mu , -�� ~-:-~ i "1:. i s th .,::~ t r �c� f,__,nd of l.: d:<r::c~::; undo ,Jbt E?d 1 y p <:'l. l'" ta. k c~ �::; of th r-? rii:1i.:Ut"""L' c i:\ l""l f"lCl t. b E' J. .::1.11 q u.:_,\qc".�. v<:;. {)uc:l i tor�� L ����� l 7HHU:, Oct .. C J. ;,~..i. rn �:; for�� c: n n "-' t".r�u E?d .,,; i. 11 c: c~ .:;,_ c:: J ;::~ :.i.m f o 1�- <::\g a .i. n �;:, t. i n t. l� 1 f:��~
DECI S ION CTA CA SE NO . 3 486 - � 10 -�� .:-:� :< ;_::� mp t�..i. u n �f" t���c:im t D. :.; "'' 1::. i Un � ( Comm iss ion e r of I n t e r n a l L e d es ma , L - 1 75 0 9, ,."J i:Hl . ::=~ o, 1 ?7 0,, :~: 1 WH EREFORE , f inding p(;~ ti t:i.on �f ot��� V�Ji t h u u 1::. m .c -~ t��� :i . t . , t h E~ �;c,a_ fn('o' :i.. c,:; d .i.. :'; m .i.s s:; f.? c:l .'.J. n d �1::. h t:~ n::~ f u.n d sought i s here by den ied , a t pe tition e r 's c o s t s . ~:; cJ DF~ DE: F\ED . --------~/ ILLER ..Ju d (] f:�? T c:UI\ICL.IF\' :: ( d i~:;�::E� nt�::; :i..n '"� f'~ p -:::~ r�c:,l. t. P u p.i. n :i.o n) CONSTANTE c ; ROAQUIN {)�::;�'30c :.i c.�. -!:�.(�:�? ,.'J uc1 q r-~
DEC i f:3IO N CTA CASE NO. 3486 �-� l .t -� CE RT I F I CAT I 0 N J hF:.� r r:- l::.~y t.h D.t. t .h .i..<:::. dE:-~c:.i ::;:i.. on .!..::.; ('!r� t ..i.c:lr'.~ VI II of the� CorJ �::-:; t:.it.L!t.i.on. AMANT E F'r� t:~sidi �lfJ .Ju.dqec Cou~t of Ta x Appeal s
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS CIU EZCJ N CIT Y CHINA BANKING C ORPD RA TICJN~ F't?+: i t. :i.nnr,~ r�� ~ --� 'IF: r� ~::. t..I<;;:. C.T.A. CASE NO. 3 486 THE CCJMMISSICJNER CJF INTER NAL REVENUE~ - ..... �~�� -��� >~ .:. DISSENTING OPINION Petitioner China Ba nkinn CD v��pur� .,., t ion CUIIl fllE~I'-C:: i D. l h ;,�!.l l k �.i.nq c::orrur~tiun duly urqanized and T .'<.n h ave exec u ted a real estate mortgage in f D'/0 1'". u �f p e tition er C hin a 8ankinq Corpnratiun over ''''� p ;::t r� c::r?l uf ! ;,;~ r�, c:l, c:uvc' r��t:�!d hv Tl.:.: �r i' lo . 1\1�� - t �I O"I.'j uf "1::. 1��,1? F~ F-' Cl j co=; t:. r�� v Cl"f DE! E�cl ~;:;. C) "f r::: i ;: �::":1 I t u c.:; E:�c:: 1.\ t " 1::�! t .hE:� p ,:�i. \/il)CI""l t �. 0 f Sa id mortqagor Ta n C h enq Lenq def au lte d in the pc:tymPn t of l�t.i. �~::. ind c> bt:. E�:d r�, F?<:;<;:.; to thE' hE11 �,k dnd �s cJ hi s Fe! ;; "\":. r� E\ _:i U cl i C: j ,;:~ J J '/ f U I'"" C!C: J 0 c.;:. E!d ~� UPUI"l
DI SS ENTING OPINION CT A CASE NO . 3 48 6 ,...:.:, c'\11 (:1 ~"'�U I cl <�>. Uc: t.inn un (;p,,.. :i..l ..'":_.i','7 ~ < r: ;: h .. F 62 :'.', :::.;:.::;u. oo <::~ t. ,Ju r lF' .~, , :1.'77";' �i. n F r1t.r�y l\ lu .. 40:l.'i H .. (F.>: h.. n) -f i:" j l UI' ' P n-f <::;t:~:.i.d mu t�� tq.::lC!D I��� t .1���,f:�' p r �o p pr��ty \-'.1 :.i. t.� h i n (':';\ ,,,.. i cl ~::; ;~). pr r-:1 P E' ,,..t .�y 1/-J.-'::\ ~:; Y~-'::l. c: J d t P el un ~::;.C)j (�::). i 1'1 t . hE' n E:'l.fl'! E�' ,., 0 �f hr-:�~ J��� r�:� .�.i. , PF''� t .i �I� i o n E! ... un c ;�,; rJ :i. -1-�.i''' l n '''' :.i.n<;:;. t:\ fllOU.r\ l. r::;.; v , 1 �'!. t-.F� ,J �.�. 1 J.. Cif.l O ( h " 1���1) ~ �'"� <:;; ,..,,\! �.i d (:0 rl c !::~d h �y� p C' t : :.i t.:i.n n r:�:� ,,.. <::; 1\lo .. cl�. � 1. y ''�:�r 1d n ,.. ~:; F�! d thr�:�~ uff:i.c:t.:�' 1-1-�- l ) " Petiti u ne~ s rn anaqP ~ s c: hE�; c k ( F :: , , " p ,:,; yn1r-=: r �ot . f 0 1���� q a :i.n ~::; t <:>. >: i::~ n r::l ~.., h �i.c: h t 1���,,. ''' 1.�� ,�. r:�;n q t .h ' / DUC h e; I,.. F' E:� l . :.i. t .i ("' I l F:� I'" ' <;:; J C: i':l. :\. fll t h i��\ '1:'. t h r�,, p d �;~ m~::�n t . u f l:..h F: a s c: reditur - mu~tqaq ee cun s .iclerinq th at, in t:. h r::�; u�f cu n <;:.ul�.i.. d,::l t.i.u l�l uf t . i. t �. l e .:':\ r � �.i.. c,:; inu fro m ext~ajudic:id l f U ,.... '::; 1::: J Cl <;:. U ,... f�::� , t .h C ht .�.,.. d f�~ rl n �f [.:' �"1'/ f!lf?rlt o'f �i.�. i l E�~ C0:1 p:i.t'.c:1 1 q r:>.i n <:'; Ul 'l l:. h r' cl E~ h t.:o r� ��- fll C)I'" l.CJ i':\(_::iUI'" ~ �for� vJ h .i.c::h pE-'ti. tionc~ r� C:\ �;:,. (::\ m f.:\ t . t E�' ,... of 3 '7. }
DISSENTING OPINION CTA CASE NO. 3486 t.� h e' r � .i.. q t�,t . to R R~en u e Me mor a ndum Ord e r No. 33-8 1 , d a t e d No ve mber 1 9, 1 98 1 (~ x h . J), pro v ides as follows: "It: ~�'Ji ll n <::o t .c'cl f 0 r� F� C!n j fl CJ t . r�� F.:\ n �:::; E:\ C t i D rl , t .ti.~:L.. <::: 5::~J:J}._ :l:, i~ :1.......... <J ;:�lj.J:I ~": t .d ~< ..JU~Y<;~ I;.} l <'?~ ..t::y: . JJ.~r.<~~: . cl C' h t .CJ I' . : .t!iCJ.I.:..J::q<'~qqr.:�. l1r~:: c:g.rJ. ".'!.<:'.... i t . .i ~::;_ I::, I)<:;~ P �'\ '~:Jy fiC)TJ TI ,::I J. J .Y ���� ''� '~0q ;tj T ..;ili<J l: l.rr:: ...f rl. c~ umq ...... C!Ii .... ~}c;:c:q t,liJ:L ....... <}f :tf.:i<;? .~?.,~),q or� d j.<:; ~~~}~~:: .i t �, iqtj qf . ...... l..fi<:;:� .r: ~:\P ,i. l:: ,::t .J ... ......5~1 ~:';.~::;e.l ,. . H r...tc: h i ri r::: urn c.:> i �;:; r��c~i;~. l i. /c:�r::l :i. f t .hr:c�' p l'�� uc PPr::l "" o t t. t��,E~ l oan exceed the cost of the proper t y mo ,... tq .,;,\C) C�!cl � ('lr�rd t �. i �::; pr��c.~�::: r.Jmi::~. h l y �f n r � t .h 5.'"-' galn der.i.ver::l that the mortgagor - debt or did n u +: p ;,:<.'i' t : he:� 1 Oi'~.r�, cJ n y m ur�� r.::~ dnc:l D. l l c:1VJF:�' d t .hP f u ,.. E� r: l u �: ,, J r��r:�' n t hi <::'. p r��u p c�:� r�� t .y ~ "' r �rc:l h E' cl i d >. r 1u �1:. :;,, J ;;::. n f�)u +�. h F�~ ,.. t.u f i 1 F! t:. h E! 1' .E�' t�.'�' �r �r1 ;,;t.r1 c:! p ;;;t t. J ��, c�~ t . ;;,t ~:: tot' ;:::.uc:h C:IE:I:i. r�, .. 11 (Lincl r::.~t���;;::.c::u vincJ �::;t.t nr' 1 :i.. r::~ r::l) Un .Jurlc' ..,..~ ,.., th F' ::..,::. Intern a l Revenu e p e t i t i o n for r ev iew .. In t .hC' of t :. hr,;:~ c:l F: f en ;::;c><;::. t:. h i::\ t . co nstru e d strict l y ;;~. c:.1;,~..i. n '"'� t t:. h rc~ - ... i t h as c:ompli e cl with th e pro v i si ons of Sec tion s 292 3 1-j . i0
DI SSE NTIN G OP INI ON CTA CA SE NO. 3 486 c:o �f I.. J �; c~ 1\ l ::,1. L i u ,. , ..,1 1 J n t r?1., 1 ,�,.; l r I:;:1�::~ \,! I�'�' �11. 1. r~ ( : c::o d F�'~ , i�:l. <;.; ::c~;n r.::�' l"iC I I�c' c.J; -I':. J��; .,:,l t p ,., y m<�'! l 'l 1::. rn 1..1. �::'. t . b e �':':1. l :t c' q C�' d \'J i t h ~. ~ :-: �'\ C:: -1':. i -l'�u dE� i':\ n d 'f a. �i_ l u t .. <�:�~ -l': c� r:l u tu c: l i':'\ :i fll l.tl i l h u u. t ,:-,, c:Jm :i. tt:. i. n q . c un <;;;.o 1 i d ic\ '1:: :.i.. un o 'f' J. .i. a.h i 1 .i.. t�.y f n ,.. "1::. h P p ,..,l. \/ rn I"�~ n "1:�. o f +:.1�, <..' cJ E�' h t. ("l l . ..... fll U I'" 1:: q ,;,\ C! U I"" , l i ~ hi 1it v ma v va l i d l v b e s h i f t e d 2 n rl ,n t �. 1�1 E' c: t... E:' d .:i.. t u t... ..... c::� t... t Cl :,:1q f-:> C' ( pI�'~ t .i t j or 1\-:-:'� r. ) , "'' "; .i. t . :.i. "':� -1': l1 ~= 1 i3. -1'�. l'. r'� ,.. :in :.il".<::: u 1� ""' n '1::. :.i.r �1n JJ f~ t : �i. -!'� .i.. U ll e r � ,, -I'� I �H��~ ;;., r:: r:: c�,... ,. ,,:�, n c:: E�! \�J :i. t .h 1 a t-�.J ::,1n cl '.i..... i::l \.�J;;, i v r.:' l" n t 11�i.. ~;; l" :i.n ht t .u c l i':l :i. m t .h F�~ I'" c:� f 1. 111d .. p E' �!:� .i -!'� i. C'o r �I F�.� I'" �i.. c:;. F' r.:! t:..i t i o n e r- : D l"l tr:: r: d ::.; t h �'lt. t�.�Jpmo ,. ,, n 1.�1u m U,..c:l E~ ,... hl u.. :::;:=:;..... u l c1 i:'l '1.- <�:�!c:l 1\l c:o vc� m h F�'I'.. .l ('?, .l 9 H l ,, rn.�J n �i f c::' ,;, t: l y c: 1 c~ i:'t ,... t h a t t h e b urde n o f p ay me nt u f t � l' l ("�' r' C i'il :i. -1'�. E~. 1 Cl D. :i rl �::. t D>: :i.n t h F~ c: un s u J :.i. cl ,;:1t. .i o 1�1 n f t h�"C~ t�. t . l c:� uf p t..�u p r?t..� t:.y
DI SSE NTING OPINION CTA CASE NO. 3 4 86 .:-: r:: 1 u."" :i.v r:~ 1 v on t .h f" c1 C' h +�or� ... [ In t : hc�:::' n t h f�:~ !'.. h :'''�r�rc:l ~ I'"C?'':; p r:-ond F�.' n t:. .i.. r1 v o k E':''� c P r� 1::.,::<. i. n r� ,.,~q r...t .i I' 'C�:> mE: n -1::. "3 'I::. D b r:-:'� c: o mp l .i. t-~ c:l \.�,r .i t 1���, mo rtq a q ee- h a n k b e for e th e mor tq a qor - c:l e bt o r T t. J c,::. rn �/ o pinion th a t p e t i tioner i s e ntitl e d u nd e r Reve nu e Me mor a ndum No. 3 3 -B l to th e r e fund o f -!:.: h e' �::. r.r. m :.i. t . h ,,,\'./ in c:.J p .'�3 .i. cl r.: E:\ p .i +�. i�:< l F .i'.'<.'.i. }ti. I'" E' h .::1 nk t�.u r::: F'�' \! c� n r.J C' D .i ""�l ,...:i.c: t n t t i c:er th e n a mes uf hi �:; C� l�� r�t i.. nc: :i. P �':\ l of th e ~ prop e rt y mor tq a q e rl -j <:; uf n o f\l U fYlr::� r; t � .. J t . .i ~'" t:. l��,a +:. t:. h t�:'�~c.:;p ju d ic -.i.a ll y h r� ou q ht ;,:<. l :. t�. c�:.-' n t :.i.. o n c::o f +�_ l' l(?. C c:�U !'" l '. fo r th e purp o~e of a djudi ca t ion . J I 11:�' r� r:�� IT�/ c:l i. �::; �::;F-' n l:. t:.o t �. hE' nv:\ :i u r�� it:v u p in .i. ur�r � C:i t y ~ .l f.fH H. ~ RDADUIN .J u dc:!E"!
More in CTA Decisions
- FIRST TELECOM PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10486)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HENRYVILLE, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2531)
- SUMITOMO CORPORATION & FIRST PHILIPPINE INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6364)
- CHEVRON HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1508)
- PHIL. GOLD PROCESSING & REFINING CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8856)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WESTERN MINDANAO POWER CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2449)
- CTA Case No. 2020 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2020)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE VS. LA FLOR DELA ISABELA, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1006)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.