[ G. R. No. 39777-778. July 02, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39777-778. July 02, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39777-778
[ G. R. No. 39777-778. July 02, 1934 ]
ANTONIO ZAMORA , PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. MAURO F. BARRETTO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________13th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Zambales________, dated the __________6th__________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed and the appellant is declared to be the absolute owner of the properties in question, ordering the appellee Mauro Barretto in due time to deliver said properties to said appellant, with costs against said appellee.
It is further ordered that __________the appellant___________ recover from ___________the appellee ___________the sum of P__158.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. NO. 164801. June 30, 2006 ](526 Phil. 788)
- [ G.R. No. 117925. October 12, 1999 ](374 Phil. 824)
- [ G.R. No. 69138. May 19, 1992 ](284-A Phil. 528)
- G.R. No. 256242, January 18, 2023
- [ G.R. No. L-32008. August 31, 1970 ](145 Phil. 682)
- G.R. No. 258592 (Formerly UDK No. 17170), August 12, 2025
- [ G.R. NO. 166382. June 27, 2006 ](526 Phil. 384)
- [ G.R. No. 109840. January 21, 1999 ](361 Phil. 308; 96 OG No. 6, 833 (February 7, 2000))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.