[ G. R. No. 39663. May 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39663. May 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39663
[ G. R. No. 39663. May 11, 1934 ]
MONICO FLORES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. SOFIA FLORES ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________25th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Negros Oriental________, dated the __________28th__________ day of __________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs against the appellants
It is further ordered that __________the appelles_________ recover from ___________the appellants____________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-31501. June 30, 1970 ](144 Phil. 729)
- [ A.M. NO. 05-10-618-RTC. July 11, 2006 ](527 Phil. 20)
- [ G.R. No. L-22515. April 27, 1967 ]
- G.R. No. 170974, March 03, 2008
- [ G.R. No. L-20398. October 31, 1968 ](134 Phil. 872)
- G.R. No. 149569, May 28, 2004
- [ G.R. Nos. 15490-93. April 29, 1961 ](G.R. Nos. 15490-93)
- [ G.R. No. 57738. October 23, 1984 ](217 Phil. 651)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.