CTA Decisions CTA Case No. OC-588OC-588 1960-02-11
CTA Case No. OC-588 (Decision)
~ M U.tSLI ... ~ t..l.P � l1illl ,, \qlf � l..OURl NANI.l.A PEAL� ) "' � -- ��� ,. � ... -- . - - ---- ' t � � .. 27 ~-
' � - �r'\ . � ty 0 th rt to . ~ 28 P ~v ~~.~~*~-~�'='~~~-~~" �
- ... ' t � � 1 29 '
. ��� - .- � � e. 0 l!W tli t � t . ~� nd . et �l 1 't Jly tJ nt of eu s ... ... rQduc d p.r t u 1J~r A,r.,..fcle 103 1 c -e ng ( f v: 5) a a� � t ' 0 .. d ~n he "Jn$ -:ruct" pt ) d th $ -ron as to no CT n 1 ~� 30
.... �- � � � � � ' t � { y I � ,. h c. <. s t "'0 ' � � , 31 �
More in CTA Decisions
- RENOIR IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11130)
- METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7144)
- CTA Case No. 6626 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6626)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ALPHALAND MAKATI PLACE, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2292)
- ISHIDA PHILIPPINES TUBE CO., INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9729)
- WINEBRENNER & INIGO INSURANCE BROKERS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7910)
- TOLEDO POWER COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1359)
- TOTAL (PHILIPPINES) CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1153)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.