CTA Case No. 1115 (Decision)
- �' � -~ - - ~ ------ ~ - 0 t t � 1� .-- l 2, n� 0J 0 v; � 1 ... � c. � co ly 0 n n yv p L 1 10 n in 1 or ro n c. h i n ol or h �
- . � ( .1 � } � � ' 1 ... n - ,. 249
� � 111 - - 1. n i of � !O 1"' l I l .X X 1 1 nl � � l � n 0 ns � il 2 5 0
� �l - c � � ~�� r: c; ~ h� ~n ih t' 1, 0 l. n 1n � �� � t 1 l ?. t � , ( 0 251
� . 11 �o 0 1f n 1 n p �o 1.. �� ... 111 -� .. � "' ... i ... � � an 0 � .h ~ ' r n ""1,. r ph y on u1 0 c ll � ( l) { 1 25 2
� 1 -- 0 1 � 1 o. 0 n � ' 1 t c - (� f � ... t p i� n c .. 0 253
� lr.; - 7- h (L �� ... � r. \ � 0h � �I � 'I n- � � � w �� � l c .0 , - � � -1 �t �� 1 � � �
I � 0 o+ a .. 1" ---� 255
More in CTA Decisions
- TECHNIRAIL, S.A. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 254)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHILIPPINE AEROSPACE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1516)
- TAGANITO MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8680)
- FILINVEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND FILINVEST ALABANG, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6182)
- CTA Case No. 4029 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4029)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FORTUNE TOBACCO CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1971)
- CE LUZON GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 553)
- CTA Case No. 5204 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5204)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.