CTA Case No. 2286 (Resolution)
llEPU8LIC OF THE fttttur... � t.ls COURt OF TAX APPEALS QUUOM CITY ALHAMBRA INDUSTRIES, INC., COLUMBIA TOBACCO COMPANY and LA FLOR DE LA ISABELA, INCOR- PORADA, Petitioners, - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 2286 HON. MISAEL P. VERA, in hi s capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - X LA SUERTE CIGAR AND CIGARETTE FACTORY, BATAAN CIGAR AND CIGAR- ETTE FACTORY, INC., LA PERLA INDUSTRIES, INC., PIONEER TOBACCO CORPORATION, INSULAR-YEBANA TOBACCO CORPORATION, LAS BUENAS FABRICA DE CIGARILLOS, 1NC. , LA DICHA CIGAR & CIGARE TTE FACTORY, CONSOLIDATED TOBACCO INDUSTRIES OF THE PHILIP- PINES, INC., LA CAMPANA FABRICA DE TABACOS, INC., FORTUNE TOBACC O CORPORATION, BAGUMBUHAY CIGAR AND OGARETTE FACTORY, D.L. TERUEL TOBACCO CO. , 1NC., and ASSOCIATED ANGLO- AMERICAN TOBACCO CORP., Petitioners, - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 2303 MISAEL P. VERA, in his capacity ffi Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - X ALHAMBRA INDUSTRIES, INC., COLUMBIA TOBACCO COMPANY and LA FLOR DE LA ISABELA, INCOR- PORADA, Petitioners, - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 2413 HON. MISAEL P. VERA, in his rnpacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
_� 2 ~ LA SUER TE CIGAR & CIGARETJE FACTORY~ COLUMBIA TOBACCO CO., INC., LA DICHA LA PAZ Y ,BUEN VIAJE CIGAR & CIGARETTE FACTORY, ASSO- CIATED ANGLO-AMERICAN TOBA CCO CORPORATION, PIONEER TOBACCO CORPORATION, BAGUMBUHAY CIGAR & CIGARETTE CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED TOBACCO INDUSTRIES OF THE PHILIP- PINES, INC., INSULAR YEBANA TOBACCO CORPORATION, LA CAMPANA FABRICA DE TABAC0 S, I NC � , F0RTUNE T0BACC0 CORPORATION, LAS BUENAS FABRICA DE CIGARILLOS, INC., LA PERLA INDUSTRIES, INC., ALHAMBRA INDUSTRIES, INC., and LA FLOR DE LA ISABELA, INCORPORADA, Petitioners, - versus - C.T.A. CASE NO. 2513 HON. MISAEL P. VERA, in his capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X RES 0 LUT I 0 N It appearing that petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing their appeals to this Court as indicated in the "Motion For Withdrawal And To Consider Cases Closed/Termi- nated" filed oil July 16, 19:85, .on the ground: 1. That on Febru ~ ry 8, 19B5, the under- signed counsel rec eived the decision of the Suprem e Court of the Philippines on the cases on appeal thereat of La Su erte Cigar and Cigarette Factory,� et al., versus Court of Tax Appeals and Han. Misael P. Vera and Alhambra Industries Incorporated, et al., versus Court of Tax Appeals a nd Hon. Misael P. Vera, (G.R. No. L-36130 and G.R. No. L-36131), respectively , affirming the decision of this Honorable Court, a nd 2. That ina smuch as the facts and t he law involved in G.R. No . L-36130 and G.R. No. L-36131, are iri ~ll fdurs with the facts and the law involved in the afore -numb ered cases
RESOLUTION - CTA CASES NOS. 2286, 2303, 2413 and 2513 - 3- of Alhambra Industries, et al., it is now pointless to proceed with the hearing before this Honorable Court of the afore- sai d numbered cases. and there being no objection on the part of respondent, the said motion is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, let the petitions for review be dis- missed and the above - entitled cases considered closed and terminated. SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Metro Manila, August 28, 1~85 . AMANT Presid ng Judge '-. � ROAQUIN
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 3924 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3924)
- SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (consolidated with case no. 7973 dtd. May 12, 2010)(CTA Case No. 7953)
- CTA Case No. 3515 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 3515)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ROBINSONS CONVENIENCE STORES, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 2388)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PENN PHILIPPINES INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2512)
- CBK POWER COMPANY LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8043)
- THE CITY OF MAKATI AND THE CITY TREASURER OF MAKATI v. CEMCO HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. AC-166)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GS MTE GRAINS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1958)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.