CTA Case No. 1608 (Decision)
\J:<:PUJIII.JC OF THE PHILIPPINEI COURT OF TAX APPEAL& QUEZON CITY ��� �1 bf ! t ... "� t � tt . �
: s f\:;(~ l* --~ ,. ~ 6Cf5 C t'~. (; s~f lJC. ~ ant Mi". l; J\'Ot~ io " -QVaO. J;o f; f.). 'iindOt"t) 0~ (iQ(} trJber l3t 1 ~~3 �o ft?tO'l � � e OO!!tt. �:to findin~ b;$ o~t :S.n l�1ln- ~ -"!" t &.:.:r. .. t) ~1et.ni -nu. to &@~ ' a t� le '11~' ; to p "t; ~ t1ilta~r ft lv��' ciY:.~:...s;;;:a!J!!~t.~ �..~-ti.d 9!...' n1.-hc'tCk~~:;u4�~t~~a~ ~:J (U.e.r./ Jr$ � .:;~s, *�llt o antc / woioi wel'e 'to '11i ON~ th>\) ��~ ;-t~rn pt.lit+- of t~ e mldtllfl c .,.. p~ t~�nt o thf' 1.~1~ n bo t~ ~}~ring trl$ i>� isur p!'o� or c edtng tn the otftJJ~ t.lf' tr~fl: Collect r uust;o~a, ti. W flll..ge 't. - t th~ Ctl,t~t:et te:t WQJ'~ ~14ied to h;~ P'�t ~x �t . apQn ..ne eapttetn Q.f tM _oat "'I on* l''ruet� o I�larl1~to , an gent of one lJ ttl Jaco'P r Jo t ~Ulu. 336
_'.. ... 3 r ..i.' ~\1'"' ~. t ttl~� !.... .::-:4. 1r; 0 vo~1\ ;;.,. ... ~.u.~ \. v;.. \.;... 10 , l9 ~..... .~.: l l.~. fl� lid tr r ... i. ton i l c. \ t! ~..~ . � ::~c �..r� � ~ � �-� Col- 1 t 37
0 ( \} {e) r t tll�Jt' .., p r .o� 1. p i- �~!.to la d . o i ln r c ' r \' 338
.tl CIS ... c ~- ~' ..:..f. v . 16 . ion l' .. � � :u< l h-23'-h/l -'o .-:;. t 963.) � t' .... p ,., t .... ~� .lo ' :: :r v.,.s l, t l .. QBS c.t t'Q~ be1n u � e ., ,:. s(;..ry . eti.on to '/:GVfJ.,. t :1. e�al 1 t .l .Lip or t;l-lYY ll~ - �o �� .r - .' , or tu fol o - 339
(J � j 340
�l -l t p lt w - 1 f4 . r l ' 1 t1 t � 10 0 ci 0 t ~l ,. c I ;J 341
More in CTA Decisions
- SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9374)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-32 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-32)
- PHILIPPINE DAILY INQUIRER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7853)
- HIMLAYANG PILIPINO PLANS, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8727)
- NIKKEN PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1569)
- CTA Case No. 5434 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5434)
- ITHIEL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1672)
- CTA Case No. 4169 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4169)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.