[ G. R. No. 39142. June 27, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39142. June 27, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39142
[ G. R. No. 39142. June 27, 1934 ]
ESTEBAN ALVAREZ ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. PEDRO ESCOLIN ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________11th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Capiz__________, dated the__________1 8th______________ day of __________October_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed with costs against the plaintiffs in both instances.
It is further ordered that the __________the defendants _________ from the __________the plaintiffs_________ the sum of P_ 98.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 93846. June 30, 1994 ](303 Phil. 558)
- [ G.R. No. L-19468. October 30, 1964 ]
- [ G.R. No. 47386. April 18, 1941 ](G.R. No. 47386)
- [ G.R. No. 123492. August 21, 1997 ](343 Phil. 803)
- G.R. No. 177294, February 19, 2008
- G.R. No. 121802, September 07, 2000
- [ G.R. No. L-2336. April 27, 1949 ]
- G.R. No. 191087, June 29, 2016
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.