CTA Case No. 1116 (Decision)

-I � 111 X� � � � � � � ~ � � � X Dc le d el ton 0 ht of b f C\l&� t I yt f 0 rt 0c � � f of h cas � 85 � of counsel for t V 'rft� �� � ollow ,, 397

, � 1116 .- p rts eifi po ... U%litze d � o �t fo pbs � . r t d ; rl ... � viol ti n of t ly nd e o �� � � ond n is 1 th f 1e1 n vi en 0 h o 1 a co. u - .. iu n 0 1� � th c vo c f ipp�r ( x � C. ) $ tb e eh n is a � foll 398 L J

� 1116 - 3- in T Cy�.le i l .. (T� .ov descriptio 0 � :reha dis p r.t in do 1 1 o1e 0 ahip - 0 t e i n ... 70 Ut. �� 0 ra h el n of I �a tion 0 t of Cire a� (n n� fo itu in eou ctlo (f � tive c 1 c �� c id s n ccessor s see led into c pl te h no h iti t l 0e -0 f art fc 1 0 n- Cl sific ti n �0 t d e ly n ek po -- co 399

: c. .,I �� 11 ... .. � 1i cla 1 "' 0. tl$ 18 ( classi i� 0 feet p i t p0 1i � 0 1 c ly. y t 1 1a 1 o t o f n rt .ele 1 nc 0 co 1t1o , o lae- iyt � t la e� � l It � � c c p~ovi- si 1 ' ,. el et ti 1 � n �,1 ... � �) a1n Ce cul 1 7 C r lal' � iol io of h ia est!o ve e i en in c s t 1� u on c �� c� � 3, � of us o. 1 , Oct. � C I ei e in. � ) c ai n f fi t p io � � n1 1 � 3. (/,1) � I #I) 4 00