[ G.R. No. 1156. January 05, 1903 ]
[ G.R. No. 1156. January 05, 1903 ]
[ G.R. No. 1156. January 05, 1903 ]
ISABELO DE LOS REYES, PETITIONER, VS. FELIX M. ROXAS, JUDGE OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF RIZAL, RESPONDENT.
D E C I S I O N
WILLARD, J.:
The complaint in this case does not allege that the court which convicted the petitioner had no jurisdiction to try the case. Neither does it allege that in the prosecution of the case there has been any affirmative action by the judge outside of his jurisdiction. It simply alleges that he has failed to take action; that he has refused to hear the witnesses for the defendant. This, if true, would constitute error, but it would be error committed by the judge in the exercise of a jurisdiction which he possessed. The remedy by certioraH does not apply to this case. The petition is denied.
Arellano, C. J., Torres, Cooper, Mapa, and Ladd, JJ., concur.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 143016, August 30, 2000
- [ G.R. No. L-29385. March 15, 1971 ](148 Phil. 20)
- G.R. No. 175121, June 08, 2007
- G.R. No. 204757, March 17, 2015
- [ G.R. NO. 156251. April 02, 2007 ](550 Phil. 586)
- [ G.R. No. 1940. February 06, 1905 ](G.R. No. 1940)
- [ G.R. No. 22066. December 02, 1924 ](G.R. No. 22066)
- [ G.R. No. 17797. November 29, 1963 ](G.R. No. 17797)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.