CTA Case No. 556 (Decision)
COL � � J - -"" -�- � ��- � � � O.t. X ' p l 7� * .. h :r 0 0 Ul:'li in a. t�on he j y " 4410. i.C n t fi eo;.... ' Iu . , c r�
- -..: � - � � . � f � l - � �� 1 � 1, which contains ,, 55 � � -
� i r� i� . .. ..Ju . L � � � '� 56
i:: .......... �� Ij ����������� j � ����!ll����<e>�<;; .�.�.���..�.�..�.�.�..�...�.� 1 i't P � �. f _,"..""'��- , '� 57
- (J s revenu collacted !n the .1l!ppi i $ on t e asis t of h n a' , i e. � t �� l .. w ~ to t i h t: at ~a c ~~ 1G n t p rt o~ its cr ss r d ap 1-d t G~pan~c~ ~nc de t o t ~ l ui l . S 0 1.t x. � LO Of ...ca. - :.0\.''CVC.r ; t G j 01ljaet tor~. to all � ~. (1 ot t :c iti!.n$ ln ,j c. y s e n ~- .,. {"� a. .....� . p � 9 2 g.. , T.t .r � ; al i ; $ ".t:"X't.i't., '.l.f:.:'c<-l_) o !\<.. ~' i ~r .v� ~56..,. th petltic. �X wrct t. er h� i p ted dof!ei � nc.y ;'{$G f!!$:J. nt. if<t t ll . :. i.tling t pay th U�lJ y ... p tit �on~ :... f ...re ur h :r in ne ... quested fo "'��;J h ~fore tre Appell te i ision of t e ';;iu � r c.} t ern i r~ ... ) ,. 5�8 '
- .. . 7- ), .. ....... ������ -. 5� . 7 ' .) 1 .'' � � � ������� � � ��� :t 59 �
l- () l ...... ~ �a�n��itl �l> � 'e- ��� . . ..... . .... ........... .. t } . t' . � 0- ,, 60
� . flu � (,.. �C � � � � � ) l l � ... � �� 61
.. � 0 - � .. . 1 X vr 0 i ;- 62
.� !: ... - �t 1 r~ c.r t t0 0 t � ..x i' 6 3
�. - I � �s :� 6 4
� ~ .' <' ,, i1 ~' l f '1 ', i � !� 65
. -- " s0 1 � a. d u � ������� . .. 66 :
- .. � '.� � �.. � � .. . � . .. � �� � � � ....... � ... ..... ... * � ............. 14 � ... � � � � ... � fc t � � to � �� � � . �. ..� �� � � � �'� �� . 4J �.... � � � � .,. # � � "t �" �� � � .. � �� �� �� 6 7
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ABUNDANCE PROVIDERS AND ENTREPRENEURS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2854)
- MONARCH AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10376)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LINDEN SUITES, INC., As represented by EUGENE U. BALCOS(CTA Case No. EB 2551)
- CTA Case No. 4402 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4402)
- TeaM ENERGY CORPORATION [successor-in-interest of MIRANT (PHILIPPINES) OPERATIONS CORPORATION] v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6340)
- CTA Case No. 6776 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6776)
- HEDCOR SIBULAN, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 798)
- PHILEX MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7753)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.