CTA Case No. 5055 (Decision)
.,...-. R!EPUBt. lC OF THE PHlL.lPPlNES t:!DURT OF APPEALS MANILA CO""ISSIONER OF l~TERNAL CA-G.R. &P No. 36587 REVENUE" Hembertu P�t it ton�t�. HARTIN 11 JR. � -~ v�rsus ~- REVE.n ., R. T. , artd AMI N, i...i..L= COURT OF TAX APP - qLS AN D HJ -CE"ENT CORPOR A rJ ON y Respondents . X- - - - - , �~ �- �- ... ... ... ... �- �- -~ � - ON "ARTIN � .JR.,. ll.,_~ Ass i ed ' i. n t h i s p~!tition f<:H' c~Wrtiot~;u�i, prohibitio n nd ma ndam u under Rule 65 o+ t he R�vtsed Rules of Cour t are two <2) Resolutions o~ the Court of Ta x Appe~l~ in CTA Ca$e No . 5055 enti t led "Hi - Cement Cor porat ion, p e t i t tonet� , V &I" !!HH! L iwayway Vi ntu~n s �- C hato" in hor cap~ctty ft~ Cdm mt &� t oner o� tnte rnal Rev � n u e , ,. ItS p on d ~ l t � ' i 1UJ � If d a 1 l 11- 0 e d l y i n Q a v e abuae o~ di$cr att a n amounting to la~k or eM c vss o� jurisdi ctio n ~ +c wi t t "(:11 f.l' . wol.t..1tion ... ;li!t.~d f.\ 1 q\..1 t lb, J~~ 4 d~n �1nu h~t'' l,lt) . p tlt t ah~t � ~ motton to d :\11mt~a :~2 -� 4.1 ~ H~n n P "f;''. F'&"t L. itHH ~'t:!� Ro l l C)) ~ ;~ar n.'if
CA- G.01 R .. SP NO . � 3 6 5 7 - 2- D II C l S l 0 N (2J ~ 9o1w t ion d~t d D~c~m b r 7 . 1 ~9 4 dmnv ing her�ln P$t ltia ner " ITit.')'t ton :"f.) r t" con s '1. d.e�w i\t. em o �f t�te court ~~r lier &aol ut on ~or i�~k �O�r tnl1lH":i.l'. Cl>tntltre 'H ''S 11 ; pp.. 4 :2~ 4 1~ 1t.1 :LO~ ! " The unde r- l �y tn q �fa � ts, a-s qatheu- ed Fr� o m the ret: ot�� d~ a t� e li!!S t1.d1 ow5: {) n 9 ~ p t s m b no � ;, a . .1. 9 q :J. � pe t i t . .t <.HH? ,. Co mmis sionwr ~+ ~ nternal Rev enu~ CC I RJ, through he r� ( s a i. ;; t a n t � tHtun i s s 1 o n f o .,. c� p .H.: .l a l 0 p �EH' a t i n " s Sar v i!.:. a . aent. t.c:� pt� 1 v a t. e r Ettipon den'l H i - Cement 1 n �f- r.:u� m 1 n g r� Gu r� p or� a t l u n ,. 1 e �� <lit a gj 11!Hil '="- , ,H! n t N ot i c.: e the l a t t e r o+ i ts de + 1~ 1 encv i n c ome ta x 1 n t hD iil l.jg r� egat e s um LJ t : lii! :J 8 ~ 6241\ .?.3i~ ~ 84 r �Ot' i nt: t:HilS e m . ,. n e d d u ' 1 n g t. i 1 t:Y ~: i s c a 1 v e ca. r� 1 9 S <f-t n n E!l x 'C" � p .� -ta. ibi tL /. 1n 1� e p 1 y ,1. n t +.:. e ! " d a t e � d tJ c: t t1 b tiP ,. 2 8 , 199 2 � pt� lvate r� e s p o rll h'! n t . t. fH uuyh :its co mp Lt- ollEH M a t� io B. C a-up ar �.g n,. i n i t i a l l y r� erm.p ond ed to the above pt� EJ~ -� eu.ises " m~nt ,c..J e\i mi� ng t. IHat t h'/5' r::ompar1y hllild no t utH.ien�st~tt~ d i.t.s inc; ome . Hs r~r.:'lss ur aC:'d that he ktl.tt� E!i!HI cr �f� 1 nt er na 1 Re v anue <B l R ) ~ in c.om p u t i n g pt� i v '~ �~ ~ espond l'.HI1:��~ t i!IN , co!ls idetr.!d t h e additional i n c-cHne f.:. tt:HTt c 'l1nln=n� sa.ll'!!s to a-ffi 1 iatea whi ch s;. hould ba e t�:emp sine!!' it. has alr@ad y been t~ ~�n up in t he co mpan y�~ booka ~~ credit or r ~du ~ lio n to cast o �F sal ~$ . <Anne x � D '1 ., p � 4 9 ~� 1 b l: ;,; � .). On Octoba-r 29 . 1 9'12. pr i va~tm t� espondent, t h �� o u g h p r� otest i t ~ c. (.' 1..1 tHH~� ! s � a e n t t o f) e t. i t 1 o n e- r e s et? ki ng t.: he n:tr.:onsi.d('H' il tton, t� e :tnv eat ig a � loo a nd r a c� all of- hE? PI" E: "� la t::k il!:lS&tssment. rot ~t. <e �f cH i b " d.) I' l~?g:. l basi. r. . <~nrun: ,.E " . p p . ::1 () �~� 51, ' I n an flS liHE!'"l!= ~l'!'i!'nt 1\f{J t.ic~ N o . FA S �� 1 ..� 88 �- 1?'2 �-- (J 0 4 1 ::s. 0 d at e d \k t o b f'H ' l 5 , 1 9 9 2 ~>f h 'i. <.: h p r i v a t a r� e s p o n d e n t t e r. "" i ,. e tl o n 0 ~-~ t o b e t " 2 fJ , 1 9 9 '2 , p . t i t i a n e r� ~ h 1 r ' 1.1 CJ. h f 1 t!' r� {'4 ':? s i s t a n t C t:' mm i 'it, e i l:' ,, R' , . for� Colle c t.iun. ~ mse5\a ed t hf:9 l ..~tter de�-icierc y income t a M ~n l ha su~ o~ ~ 2 8 ~62 4 ~9 81.0 :. with the n otation to pa v the sam~ o n or b fo r ~ �November i !:'t , I CJ l;'.2 ,. tA rr\a :t 14 F'~ ~ f1. ~:~16< ibi.ri ,. )
CA-&., R. SP NO. ~ot"..e7 - 3 �- 0 E tt l 8 I 0 N In protest ther~to. p i vate r e$pondant sttnt to petltian ~r l�tter d� t ed November 12~ 1992 semklnq th� recall �nd r�con�ldwration of t t �t assfuaune~n1: no tice ,. <Annen "G .. , . PP� 53��� 54, lbid.) 011 Otu:: f:l'mbe' l . 11?93 11 f)lli 'tlttir.HUiH� , through her A~ ~~-t ~ nt C hief~ Accounte ~eiv~blm / Btlt i � , ,f~! Oi v i!!Ston, !!lm>nt. to pt- lva~ttt ,- .,'&~ondent. "~ I in;a l NC1t1. c tt whit:.h the l a t t e r� r� �r.:~ed on {) E<r : em ber tQ " l'-IH~ 3 ~ t h . tRnOI'" o �F wh :i. c; h \ rea dsr. .� " Ycc;Jr' r~'lfili nt.~ ~ tliAJ1 l i a b l l i t v �ft:H.. t h e. )'P. J1lt' / S ,!.~i~ ;llil'iltHHit. l nr~ tt:1 !,;!;,.;I,.,.Z Qd.'l. ~ ~i J..~l]i 1m: lt..tdi ng inc 1� e tnfl1nt Wt urH~!!:t t~ ; Oil! . / f.).emrMnd Nr;u !If � f_ �~\J!~~. l~~.~.~ 7',!~.=~~.!>2.1U.l..Q ~iat ~d lJ..:.:.J..ti:..'f;.:i. lifhH.: h H ;: li,'i 't ; i l l t!tU1:. 1!!l'I:I.UHHnt;~ l.Ofi!pit Of: :!t'll V ~!H �1 I, f'l~)t 1 f:iiUI IPJ1ll b!i!' t� taf~t' t" tHl �h :W 1 ~~!'!'' ��l> rlt: t-'- O-f t�UU" I'' fli. H t ~nd /t.W Judt c'i<lll ":tr:. t:l t::~ n. '; t~f'"f< H ' ~"" rki. nQ t!(;l ,. ~nd t.: o ~.'! t:J id i. n �� on ' ' !!' r , i c q ��11: rt" vt.RI a!! ,, ~~ t" ��q\.-!t!J.\1!\d:�.:!I'd t r.:.J ~i.:rU: h1 lh t'' e;,.jl!d . d t:a.ll l i hJ.J.tl v o n cw b!C!1:.tl.lnv L~:~� t~~:�J:~~. '1':,1.1) t h�~ Ac:c:e.; ,mt:. ~ r~ oot::~i v a. l �tr�~' ft illtnQ Di v iro~ ton~ Room 2)~ . SI P Bwilding- Dlli man, Qu~zm n C .lt v in P ! dE?I" thsAt t h fii' t:.".!a\Qlili' c101 n b:te r.:. l. O~�~HJ <"t!ld 1': e?tt'ril i f'lM' �E d .. ,, "P)<:> �<'�~ ~ t,H Yfi~ thi 'ill v~.mr p r� ;o1 �f �9r li'H'l l 1;~, l ;.lA 't.'t l.l.H1 t i t."Jt'l � ' ' l n t a r p r� e t i r� ~r 1 s a. i. d '' f'.:' i n a I, Nut i. c: e " as ~etitloner � s f 1 n a l deci ian on i t s pro : e$l~ fH' ivata tf.P.9JHlnd �Pn t fi d with t. he Cot.ut o #: Ta H Appeals t ~ TI I uP ~l liHlUI!u� y 2~ 1.-.;'J JI s P mt 1 t i o n � o,-� Review whi c h w~ q dock�ted ~s CTA Cane Nm. 5055 ( A nne ~o~. '' I '' ~ p p ~ ;:; 6 .....l!t 2 10 i b i. d � i * fl ,.. a y t n y t. hat t t h t.t> court s�t asid e thw as~essm�nt i8wu ed by th lUI. ;j \
' (~I ~ �~~1> .c--�:~cR..t. SP NO.. 36581 - 4- s 1 �o. N �I A~ter seve� a t motlon ~or eHtenwicn o * imtt t.o � i l � pl ad ing poti t i.on r� -filed b�ln�w � motlon to d sm\se on the ground o � lack o� j ut'" isdi ~et ian ai.n � e t ht.t sa i d "'Fin.e l 'N.ot:i. c:e" does not c onstit ute a �inal da ct~ion on he a B&!Sfllllftln fH� o\� l<>a o tr ~ tO Jl!lldfu~ at j �O H thet~ teu �f Which is illlP(JW 1. � ~'l tt to th . t:t4'' <An ne K " J",. pp. b '3 - 7l~ i.h d.) ~ In a fhn.;;olutl n d~ted Ai.U;JUS>t 16. t 99 4, " he C TA deni d e it 1 on r ' s motion to d mis � with a di9 ~ ~ntin y vot e from sociate Judge Ramon 0. Oe V� yra ( \ nn N- .. A" , pp. � ~~ 2- 41 .. i b i d . ) . Th. C T A 1 il<a w i s e ti <? n i e d p e � i t i C.HI !il r� ' s mot i c n -f o ,.. reco ns id ration � n a Aasolutlon dated De �em ber 7~ .t994 <An ne x "Ft"~ Pl'l. t1 'l .. J.l 7 " l b i d . ) . Hftn c~. thi~ p . t l t i o n fi l e d b y the C IR allegi.ng 9'" v s ;,:~l n.l5e o � d if:>Cf"'rftion mou1 t.ng to l.a ch Gl" e ~c: e a , _., Jur~ isdicl.ion c.tn hre pat� t of the CTA in den ~ tnq both h r mo 1 n to dis mi as end mcJti un -f ,. ' >"'f On!Bi d r-al.ion . Thi $ pet.iti un g tmpress~d with mer t . the .iur� is.d �r.-lio n rJi' thE~ CTA i~ r.:a n-f-� l'tl!ld b y Rep �u b l i c.:: Ac.t No. 11 25, s a mu n ded~ o ther~4 i!lie known as An Act Cre a i n g thw Court a-f Ta H Appeal s- fha> pet� t.i tUHl t prc> v islon of: he l w stat !H " '~ tl::+ t�;J J"l i ~ ,Ju. � i ~dJc: t:o~or�� HI � CCH.It '. ' r.��f� TtiOI (lfppr&~l4l~ lillhlft\l.l, &M~ r c l �~ ~H . lu~ vm .� pp 1l~t~ ll" ifl.dt c 1 10r1 to V111il ~ll by a rJP l~ a h u� r �fl'! .l n p t" t:>v' t dfiH:f - " 1l � .0K1sion o� the c: a��� Cumm �� i "n . f' o<f 1nt��~ n11l R�v�nu� i n ifWD lYinQ d �pu.t.�d �������me nt .. � r ru.P nda r.>�f 1nt .u � n l t.SlH~II'., f- tVH.'I'SI! I:Jt' (;' ! ' � h . l " fH�ma 1 i � 1 tn J'!IO!l!�st .i ln i h~ r to ~ or m � h�~ m~tt~r� "n de 't hQ> N t~ i.l':lnGd 1 rt+:.r:tt� na l a i,.() or othwt�� lMtt.! o r peri: !>"' �' l :M~ .n drr.tr'l �C .~ n!'d b y 'l:hl!i! :au !::l 'f- lntt�H'! I�" l *~ !ll'V61mUG:>I N 1�1 l'f l1 >1 11 ( � J'nph ;a ~:!' 1 s QU.PV~ l .i d>
QA-G. R. SP NO.. ~6587 -"- �D I L.C 1 8 I 0' N In the � ~ a Co M� ~ � sJo n� r oF lnt�rn�J RII V IHJU� Vlf .. \It .1 IJJ ( 2 .;2 S (.~ A 3 ,. 6) h� word "dwciwi o n sM in n~ g p h 1 . S c t . o n 7 a F Republ i. Ac Nc, . 1 1 2 5.1 ha t. �� n i n t. pr� et:ad o� m��n t h � d&cl �t hW D f � h� Co mm i~�i ons r o~ Inte r n a l Revenu � on the ~rat��~ oF the a ~ pa y � r IUJainst t:Uim As �H'! n s. Oa �ini � e l y.,. Ill! ld wor :t d o es nn t . igni~ y t h~ a s~~ ms n t it~ 1 + ~ . a ''d i s p uted .ns�U f !l s .men t H On t. h e ot: h et h<!!~nd. undat- t h e &i i!Htl e p rn v l!:illo.n a �f h~ l a w hB l.t~ en interp r ete d b y l he Sup e rn e ~ aurt in t h e ~ arue c: ase. citi.nq B . � S tephen " s l hHH H: i �Ji:Jon a�n d 5t . f:J twpll.- n's Ch1n '3' <:i fj' fi.i r l "' e: .r:ic fu:Jo l �s~ �s Col .llf' t cw oF Jn �f.~tJ ' n .ttJ R w v<-' I H.H1l' ( 'l 0 4 P h . l " 3 14 ~ 3 1 '7 >, f' ollow s s ., \( \<( ,i\lt J,) �.A y ~ qt..l f1!~ t J n n ., ~1 r�l n t ~ n :1 .;u alos t twJ C tJ l I ,,,, ,; tn t� � o rf~ t:O tHili t!1:tt' Ci . c: ~a nr.: 1P. J 1 I t ~il 5 tn ~ I' et. i'IU �l<i h ~� t. Ute- ,.HIH C:~lil. ' l\iH" 1 b~ 1 i!.1'V 5 he 'l � fii:� t l i di\b l~ t.h $ t� ~ft.:H' , t h .� IIUHJ! t!iHUH!P !I'lt bf<'C:Offl il?tl ' d i pI . t!<tl !a \UH~ I!; m ~ n t � th t th Co lJ. ~F n� n tl!l +' df ,. i d'.i:t. ii\ f,d 't h ~ tili ){ P ~Y'A' t' I,"' ~ PP t\Hill t: t:) th~~ CI:JI,.I I'' t t) f1 T ;,~; ~~ . p l P ~ ' t ~ o nl ~~ u . r..m tll r:; l'.!' :t pt� �o -f �f~ h rt.~ er.: 1 ''!' � � n of t llt~ Co 1 1 flit: t. CH" o r1 t h !':l m ~ ;n ,.., rl~ ?l ;.( }( " (til t: PP � 4:'1 "" 7' The CrJt.t r�� t a ' Co mm i ss i on e r o F In t 1u � netl R ~ v e nue V IN � V .i 1 J ;~ ( !HJPr a ) .. unt j n .t fil?' d t " No~ �' 't~ h .a t h ~ ldilt�J \ l 5c:> t:J t r, ~ tlo t� d � d~t: i !If 1 on~ 1' 11o't ~lUll . 0 lllfl i>'>r d, 8 " � h \.15 rl.ll' t. h .~ r� 'tf"c di.!alt ii HI tt, lr;. t,]lV!il tSVtlil' tn t n t l f'Ht L.1 1!.\,\ bJ ct l~ o 1tH::H ciid n;.1 v f.tttw 1 I ur~ fJMc J r;; J t:.m 1::H � ~ h~ Comm :U!t . J. � 111<'1 t c.m �t hm r- ut.~ � �t . q t na t IIH1 ;Q . ill; "'7ii m nt. but nc:;t t l"! �1l?.e �ue m ,~ n l � j, e1 � " (M p. ! J Ba s e d on th m � o r e go n g, the i nal Not i c e dated Da cm mbsr 1, 1 "99 3 Un n e }( " H "" p. 5~, i b i d. ) o f h d fic i &r cy � a x ass samant iss u e d b y p t 1 t l rHtat~ aq �!II ma � . pr 1 v t e espo nden t c: nno �t b in e r p r 9 e d h e fi n l d e ci io n of t h
,, .. \'"" �QA-6. R. 9.P NO. 36587 -.- v ��a.� ~- � I S l 0 N o� Co mmi ss o ner or lntll!rtal fw v wnu~ o n dl�putad �����s~ent whi ~h the Caur la M ppwals *�Y tak� CO Qni ~ n c� o� und�r ectinn 7< 1) o RA 11 26. r.~id .f1 iP "' I n i �� asp � 1 �ton�t� a gu��� l� mer�tv "a ~ l $pl emind�r o th� pr iv te respDnd~nt ot t~� t�n l i a b i l i t y ed $ontshin9 the l~ttsr to pay tha � �m� b ~are Dec�Mb& r ~ ~~ 199 3~ othwrwi a ~ i � w 11 b e~er ed ~ or lsauance oF wer� r ant and / o Judici 1 actton .n I t ie �n ot t h ~~~ ~c imlon app&alable� t c:; the CTA as i t d � d no t de c l dm th& protast earlier Pt led by p rivet@ respond en t nor did i t r ~~r thereto . Neith+~r t:h ~-r t h eat tt t t he �� '!!J&ment ehal 1 b �- 6i! f ! ' , . e d -for i 'l!i u an e o + wa r r� ant and/or Judi cial action wlll m he tha Final No l i c e ~ f � 1 n <� I chu; i 55 i o n o f � t he �' 1 o n t he pr� o �t:.ll"!Bt.. in l. r' m tdtFHJlone r oF lntu- r nal f'? venue ,.... Un J on 51l1 PI' r ng c:wpor r::tt J Clll ( lE35 se ra~ 54"7 t 5 ~ 2 > -~ no t w .i t h c, t: n d l n g t:. h _ t: a. w a r� r an t o �f dtstr$int ~nd l ~' Y h$� b e n te�u~d. t he Supre fte Cf..l Li t"t d'tJ not r "u n��dd~H' the oa~ ma s the .BlR"e; f - i n a l d c:: :isiof o n e disput d BG � e~ IFH;~ nt. The Court cat gor J ally rulgd that th. � umml$slon-r of In ternal R Pv ~nue mu s t s t a B wh~th . r h i : ou: t i o n on ~ q�. t!'i'$ . lfJned t9!fll!U!S>~ �ment: ts f nal. fi 1 I the mc:u e a n the c.� a. e a , b6H � th tht� e.,tentng st- <:~1. -emwnt in thfe Final not:lce cannJt be con s 1de re-d a. f- i nal de(: ision on f.H" :i. vate r on�1'"'nt: $ t it 'lil puted i>\!!~e ~- sment whGH 1; a i d no t i c e d I ! l n n t fi!' v S! n n, e:' h et ma n t i t'Hl o �f t t� 4P pt� tJtt!i!~~&t. W d tJ '' o ~ u b g;o c r� l b t: o pt- iva te t� e . p o n d tt n ' s � ( ' , rd;. .. n t i o n t h a t t h ~ CS!!U?. u �f Sttl'" i(ldiD E' ler; t: r , ,. Co , . fnc . v fi! . C�.1 -t.r rt: t;_, F T f!I N pve snt fl/Jf.l .~~tlfli> <s �, fiiCI - l-? 523) aptditt �!'!' to t_he . ult . ri~at9 re�pDnd nth~~ tak~n 0\ . 0 ~~ c:ont. ~. t hG! e-t ."\l & IIH-Ul t nf t hf;' Cou t- t htr:r� re n ~ ,.. Lrt '' " l< ~ rh~ trH \ 0 1' 0 1;: tht;t, l$ttfflr� ~ ''; J; �~'!' " i Fi . 11 �, t �- !!f+;. st . m~r't r \it� r ~:lit ,q t.: h l"" � 5-';) t" � t~ ;J.) 1 et;J.<~ 1 r�madj� s� t~k Q bl y lnd c at~~ tl; r i t� natLW \9.- c~�F �the d�~ �. nn � f1 ~t. h .m m ,~d~ bv thfJif Co mm . IS !IS '� '�� r'Ht tJ ~ t. t1 . p �t. t t :i. ,. m:H' ' 11 d . f j r:: 1 'r" f !" � nc.h 1 . ~� t: iH<: li-tiibi! P " (ltlt p. '5 b '
:f'' r~�, ,. -� � ,. �� ' ~I !!!� \ T" � � "It Co.Aa-Gc.R1. SP NO. 36587 - 7- s 1 o .... A rw ding r.t F t he f'~u:.:tM of� the t:: l\ll !lf would r�v��l hat he nrot e�t o pe~ttion�r thwr�in. Surigaa �&c . r� lr Co., ln t: .. ,. tHl it!!l. d�-fth: i�ncy 'fr�nchis� .Jut ,.,. r.~ s init.iadl.y resr.trJndfl!t d to by th Commillsioner o + Internal Ravenua who r�*�rr�d th� ���� to th Gen� r l AudltJnq 0� lew <now Co mmis9lon on Au di t>. Therea~t�r. th�re was Mn eMch .eng& o f �. ot" l ' f." S f;HJndw.nce between B uri. Q:ao.� on the one hand~ n d t he ClR and the Auditor Gen�ral < no~~ - i� mmi� sJ. tlnll'tr -f Audit). n �. he other. lt wa s o nly aPt r th � xc heng� D~ c orrespond�n c t h~ t th C f R issu d a revis@d �~� &9ment coni ~ l ning thew ning that ln thw �vent p t i t ion P' ~ailR d to pa y th~ d�~ tcie n cy t;;u~ ast&a'!lsef;l . l he CIR �woul j be c onf!tt:t- a\.ned to enf"c.u� c e he t.--: l l lf3c t i o n u-f the ta~e by mean s o~ the remedl.e a pr� ( � i dt~td b law. wh i : h t he Su p re m C o u t" t c on s i de r e "' t. h., �r; i n �~ l de c. i e i o n a 1:> 11 e 1 a b 1 e to t he C �u\. rhe Pf' t!HS .. nt. t. �s�.t;; i s dif �fi!HWnt. fh CI ' s Final Nu tic . u n tha !H!!� t~& m n t altho gh de norn i n atl!i!!d a " f in 1" canno t be t::r..tnside t~ ed a fi Ju'll df!2' c. i.s;iun o �f the� BlFi' on pt� j va.t9J t- eBpondent � s prr. I 1!Htt ~ - n r.:a. sus !!' r L tP.r ~ ated. it did n ot dPc d e he pta est nor e ve n men t i o n e d o t � r� f w l " , . >~ d t o i. t . We re c all I h S u J' t!!�me? C i u t ' t � s f.:: on c 1 u s i o n l. n t: he c: 11l ~ 6.!' o f.' 1mm 1 s s I oner� c:JF In t f!l'" ns 1 R'e ,,�enu�P ve .. Vi l l a (Bup .:~� . t:h ,u ;a "'' � H t h fl HH' di<:. t :I. O h Of titt 1 .a H 1.�� u .t~ � ~ l: c1 r� � ';L ,�t�l b y p �e�1! rJi?Jl �i e; .J cn .f . fl f':t~ C r 11111i.t 11!! 11 l 1.� !(-'W of 1 nt ~w r-t ~ l, Rft.i'.,,. t~ nut? on di Pl.t t~. d i:\1 '4l!. tr.e~~ lf'l~flt'l. Thw f&ul C4.~i'I.,.W t :1 \1' 01 c: ~"Ji. ... t 0 i� S.Pt'? (;. 1. Q J IIJI'' itilld t.:ti CJth �~>i!> uc:h~ t I'.:.J< t1 ta k~>t agni z anL ~ o nl y o~ ~uch matt ers a~ .s.u �"" � :� l~~ ��t� l v wi �hin l. t~ ji,Ar i ' d .t s:. 1. ,; 1'1 ~ .. ~ i.l t p .. '! j #IIHEREFDRE REI"..JS S C.ONSJ'DER'.ED., thi pet. lion e h f E~L~.,, GRANTI�J).., T h R e so l u t i t'Hl!ii oF respondent Co u1 l t31- f .i' ,~ t-,pp 9alil� d .ated lhHdt..t s t.:
- .. .... "' .,.~. C~G.R. SP NO. 36397 -a- DE 0 JS 1 0 N 1 b" 1 99 4 and D~H � ~ lhbll!u~ �r , 1 99 4 a r 5Et' ABIDE and decla r etd NLILL a.nd ll OID.� Acc ordingly, CTA Cas� Nth 5 "155 i l!i DISI<JI SSED. SO ORIJ/iiRE.'D. WE CONCU n.� U�: OMA ~ t~fi.so i ate ..luwt 1ce \.. RUBEN 'f. Aa�oc: .tat.e Jumt1r:: e AT r S A X N J h er� eby ~'' .st thlid: thi."" decision wa li5 r~ ea c hed a t: ter� r.:tue cons ul P.tti. un mon ] th me mbtu� s u �F 1:. h i !!' P .t v i f'> i u n ~ 1 n ~ o r� d .s ru.: e w i �t h the p t- r.>vis.ir.HH~ 11F B fi! ~ t.tt.>n lJ., l~rt:.1r: 1a V I I I t>f~ t he C t:.HH& t i t U t. l. tlll . nt.h Di v il!iliiun
More in CTA Decisions
- REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ROBIEGIE CORPORATION(CTA Case No. OC-023)
- CTA Case No. 6398 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6398)
- CTA Case No. 3411 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3411)
- CTA Case No. 2699 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2699)
- MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7545)
- JOHNNY M. KING , JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9753)
- SYMMETRY PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8324)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. YUSEN LOGISTICS CENTER, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 1953)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.