[ G. R. No. 41058. June 06, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41058. June 06, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41058
[ G. R. No. 41058. June 06, 1934 ]
CATALINA MORALES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. MACARIA GARCIA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Bulacan________, dated the __________30th__________ day of _________October____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, set aside, affirmed and the costs of this instance taxed against the appellant.
It is further ordered that__________the appellees__________ recover from ___________the appellant___________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 205010. July 18, 2016 ](790 Phil. 216)
- [ G.R. No. 3811. March 07, 1908 ](G.R. No. 3811)
- [ G.R. No. L-9685. October 30, 1957 ]
- [ G.R. NO. 158992. January 26, 2007 ](542 Phil. 137)
- [ G.R. No. L-49539. September 14, 1987 ](237 Phil. 695)
- [ G.R. No. 117412. December 08, 2000 ](400 Phil. 1247)
- A.M. No. P-07-2336 (Formerly OCA I.P.I. No. 07-2524-P), January 24, 2008
- [ A.M. No. 96-11-402-RTC. August 21, 1997 ](343 Phil. 518)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.