Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Upholding Judicial Efficiency: Consequences for Delay in Rendering Decisions and Issuing Summons
The Supreme Court fined a judge for gross inefficiency, underscoring the 90-day decision rule and the duty to request extensions.
Upholding Decorum and Ethical Conduct in the Judiciary: Fines for Misconduct and Inefficiency
The Supreme Court consolidates three administrative cases, fining a judge and court personnel for misconduct, inefficiency, and violations of judicial rules.
Procedural Technicalities vs Substantial Justice: Court Rules in Demolition Cases
How a judge's failure to meet the 90-day decision period in demolition cases led to administrative liability and a fine.
Court Personnel Smoking or Vaping in Court Premises: A Less Serious Offense
The Supreme Court holds court personnel liable for smoking or vaping within court premises, imposing fines under Rule 140.
Bouncing Checks and Subsidiary Imprisonment: What BP 22 Violators Face
Can a BP 22 violator be jailed for failing to pay fines? The Supreme Court explains subsidiary imprisonment rules.
Judicial Accountability Fines and Warnings for Neglect of Duty and Delays in Case Resolution
The Supreme Court fined a judge P40,000 for gross inefficiency and misconduct over delayed case rulings and defiance of court orders.
Lawyer's Courtroom Conduct: Disbarred Attorney Fined PHP 155,000 for Disrespect
Supreme Court fines disbarred lawyer for disrespecting court personnel and disobeying IBP orders, clarifying penalties after disbarment.
Court Employees Cannot Act as Insurance Agents: A Lesson in Judicial Ethics
The Supreme Court fined a process server for facilitating bail bonds through a surety company, reaffirming the ban on court employees engaging in insurance activities.
Habitual Tardiness in Public Service: Upholding Accountability and Efficiency
A Supreme Court resolution on habitual tardiness in the judiciary explains how the offense is defined, why excuses fail, and what penalties apply to court employees.
Good Faith in Bigamy: Limits of the Defense and Judicial Accountability
Bigamy requires criminal intent, but good faith has limits. A judge who acquitted based on a foreign divorce decree was fined for gross ignorance of the law.
Judicial Dishonesty: When a Judge Misleads the Court and Violates the Duty of Candor
The Supreme Court fined a judge for dishonesty and lack of candor after he misrepresented his case load to secure a transfer. Learn the rules.
Deregulation and Due Process: The NTC's Authority Over SMS Regulation
In Globe Telecom v. NTC, the Supreme Court struck down a fine on Globe for offering SMS without prior approval, exposing the regulator's confusing rules.
Executive Judge Fined for Overstepping Authority in Cases Pending Before Lower Court
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that executive judges cannot issue orders in cases pending before lower courts, even with good intentions.
Habitual Absenteeism of Court Employees: Accountability and Mitigating Circumstances
The Supreme Court defines habitual absenteeism for court employees and clarifies that personal obligations do not excuse unauthorized absences.
Habitual Absenteeism of Court Employee: A Case on Public Trust in the Judiciary
Court process server fined for habitual absenteeism; ruling underscores that personal obligations do not excuse neglect of judicial duties.
Conspiracy and Superior Strength: When Group Attacks Become Murder Under Philippine Law
How the Supreme Court defined conspiracy and abuse of superior strength in a group killing, convicting an accused of murder on circumstantial evidence.
Treachery Defined: When a Surprise Attack Qualifies as Murder in the Philippines
When does a sudden attack amount to treachery that qualifies killing as murder? The Supreme Court explains the rules on treachery, bail, and double jeopardy.
Grave Threats Case: Why Judges Must Apply Summary Procedure Correctly
In Riño v. Cawaling, the Supreme Court fined a judge for gross ignorance of the law in misapplying summary procedure in a grave threats case.
Judicial Accountability: Undue Delay and Disobedience as Less Serious Offenses
Explore the Supreme Court ruling on Judge Villegas, fined P20,000 for undue delay and defiance of Court directives.
Treachery Defined: Unexpected Attacks and the Element of Surprise in Philippine Criminal Law
Understanding how treachery (alevosia) is established in Philippine criminal law through sudden, unexpected attacks that ensure the victim cannot defend themselves.
When Judges Fail the Bar: Default Orders and the Duty to Notify
A judge's failure to furnish defaulted parties with court orders violates judicial conduct rules, resulting in a fine.
Navigating Jurisdictional Waters Where A Crime Occurs Defines THE Court That Hears IT
Judicial Accountability: Delay and Abuse of Authority in Search Warrant Issuance
A judge fined P15,000 for issuing a search warrant without authority and delaying resolution—lessons on judicial accountability.
Court Employees' Brawl: Misconduct in Office and the Judiciary's Image
The Supreme Court fined six court employees for a workplace brawl, stressing that fighting in court offices erodes public trust and warrants discipline.