Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Rape vs Acts of Lasciviousness: Proving the Crime Beyond Reasonable Doubt
How Philippine courts distinguish rape from acts of lasciviousness and what evidence proves carnal knowledge beyond reasonable doubt.
Incestuous Rape and Relationship as an Aggravating Circumstance: People v. Mendi
In People v. Mendi, the Supreme Court affirmed three rape convictions and clarified how a father's relationship to his daughter aggravates the crime.
Intent Matters Distinguishing Robbery With Rape From Separate Crimes
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when a sexual assault followed by taking property is one complex crime or separate offenses.
Due Process in Rape Cases: Why Alleging Qualifying Circumstances Matters for Death Penalty
The Supreme Court explains why the death penalty in rape cases requires the qualifying circumstances to be alleged in the information, not just proved at trial.
Unwavering Testimony: How Philippine Courts Uphold Victim Credibility in Rape Cases
Learn how Philippine courts assess witness credibility in criminal cases, using the Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Navarro as a guide.
Moral Ascendancy in Child Rape Cases: When a Stepfather's Influence Replaces Physical Force
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how a stepfather's moral ascendancy can substitute for force or intimidation in child rape cases.
The Weight of Circumstantial Evidence in Securing Justice for Victims in the Philippines
How the Supreme Court upheld a rape-homicide conviction based on circumstantial evidence, explaining the rules for proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Rape and the Requisite Allegations: Protecting Due Process in Criminal Prosecutions
The Supreme Court clarifies that special qualifying circumstances like relationship must be alleged in the information to justify the death penalty for rape.
Rape and Parental Relations: Clarifying Special Qualifying Circumstances in Philippine Law
A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when rape qualifies for the death penalty and why allegations of relationship must appear in the information.
Incestuous Rape: Why Alleging Minority in the Information Matters
A father's rape conviction was reduced from death to reclusion perpetua because the Information failed to properly allege the victim's minority.
Protecting the Vulnerable: Upholding the Death Penalty in Child Rape Cases
The Supreme Court affirms the death penalty for the rape of a six-year-old, detailing the rules on victim credibility and evidence.
Rape and Relationship Qualifying Circumstances and Penalties
Understand how rape penalties change when a qualifying circumstance like relationship is proven, based on Philippine Supreme Court rulings.
Rape of a Mentally Retarded Person: Consent and Knowledge of Disability
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on rape of a mental retardate, consent, and the need to allege knowledge of disability in the information.
Rape and Consent: Examining the Boundaries of Force and Intimidation in Philippine Law
The Supreme Court clarifies that rape is defined by lack of consent, not by the timing of physical force. A knife held during the act proves intimidation, and the death penalty was reduced to reclusio
THE Testimony OF Rape Victims Credibility Corroboration AND THE Burden OF Proof
Reexamining Eyewitness Testimony and Guilt in Philippine Rape-Homicide Cases
The Supreme Court affirms a rape-homicide conviction, explaining how minor inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony and alibi defenses are weighed.
Eyewitness Testimony and Positive Identification in Murder Cases: People v. Paraiso
How the Supreme Court weighed eyewitness credibility, minor inconsistencies, and alibi in a rape-with-homicide conviction.
Threats and Testimonial Discrepancies in Rape Cases: Conviction Affirmed Despite Minor Inconsistencies
Supreme Court affirms rape conviction, ruling that minor testimonial inconsistencies and delayed reporting do not undermine a credible victim's account.
Reasonable Doubt in Rape Cases: When Discrepancies Do Not Destroy Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that minor inconsistencies in rape testimony do not create reasonable doubt when material facts are credible and consistent.
Child Rape Conviction Upheld on Victim's Testimony and Medico-Legal Findings
In People v. Osing, the Supreme Court upheld a child rape conviction based on the victim's lone testimony and medico-legal evidence, stressing that corroboration is not required.
Rape Conviction Upheld THE Importance OF Victim Testimony IN Philippine LAW
Statutory Rape IN THE Philippines AGE OF Victim AND Evidence Admissibility Explained
Rape of a Mentally Disabled Victim: How Courts Assess Force and Intimidation
The Supreme Court explains how force and intimidation in rape are measured when the victim is mentally disabled, citing the Dumanon case.
When Force Is Relative: Rape of a Mentally Disabled Victim in Philippine Law
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how force and intimidation in rape are measured against a mentally disabled victim's condition.