From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1825–1848 of 25,378 articles

Compromise Agreements and Third Party Rights: Protecting Property Interests in Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on compromise agreements, third party rights, property interests, and execution of judgments explained in plain language.

Navigating Will Probate: Key Lessons From a Landmark Philippine Supreme Court Case

A Philippine Supreme Court decision on property under custodia legis offers crucial lessons for lawyers and litigants in estate and will probate cases.

Due Process in Administrative Cases: No Liability Without Formal Charges

Supreme Court rules a government employee cannot be held administratively liable without a formal charge, reaffirming due process in civil service cases.

Judicial Conduct: Balancing Religious Freedom and Impartiality in Court

A judge's use of Bible verses and remarks on sexual orientation during a preliminary conference drew administrative penalties from the Supreme Court.

Relaxing Procedural Rules in Appeals to Protect Property Rights From Counsel Negligence

When a lawyer's negligence causes a late appeal brief, the Supreme Court may relax procedural rules to protect a party's property rights and decide cases on the merits.

Just Compensation in Expropriation: Valuation Must Be as of Filing of Complaint

Supreme Court clarifies that just compensation in expropriation cases must be based on property value as of filing of the complaint, not later market data.

Due Process Prevails: Informations Clarity Protects Against Unfair Conviction

The Supreme Court rules that administrative liability requires a formal charge, protecting public employees from unfair conviction based on delay alone.

Just Compensation in Expropriation: Valuation Must Be as of Filing Date, Not Later Market Data

Supreme Court clarifies just compensation is valued as of complaint filing date, not later market prices, in DPWH expropriation case.

Pancreatic Cancer and Seafarers' Benefits: Proving Work Relatedness Under Philippine Law

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies when a seafarer's non-listed illness like pancreatic cancer is compensable, and the strict proof required.

Corporate Disputes: Navigating Derivative Suits and Jurisdictional Boundaries in the Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when derivative suits are proper and how jurisdictional boundaries apply in corporate disputes.

Police Blotter Duties Clarified: Valderas v. Sulse on Neglect of Duty

Supreme Court clarifies police blotter scope and simple neglect of duty in Valderas v. Sulse, protecting officers from baseless administrative cases.

Upholding Ethical Conduct: Disciplining Lawyers for Misrepresentation and Unauthorized Practice

The Supreme Court suspended a lawyer for deceiving courts over inherited property and reprimanded another for unauthorized practice, reaffirming ethical duties.

Prior Physical Possession Decides Forcible Entry Cases: Palajos v. Abad

Learn how the Supreme Court ruled on prior physical possession in forcible entry cases and what property owners must prove.

Navigating Tax Refund Deadlines: The 120-Day Rule and Its Window Period Exception

Learn how the Supreme Court clarified the 120+30 day rule for VAT refund claims and the window period exception under BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

VAT Refund Claims: The Window Period Exception to the 120-Day Rule

Learn how the Supreme Court applied the window period exception in VAT refund claims, allowing taxpayers to file judicial claims without waiting for the 120-day period.

VAT Refund Timelines: The 120+30 Day Rule and Its Window Period Exception

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies VAT refund filing deadlines, the mandatory 120+30 day rule, and the window period exception under BIR Ruling DA-489-03.

Unreasonable Searches Evidence Inadmissible When Police Exceed Warrant Scope

When police exceed a search warrant's scope and violate Section 21, seized evidence becomes inadmissible, potentially leading to case dismissal.

When Health Declares Unfit Seafarers Right TO Disability Benefits Beyond THE 240 Day Limit

Understand when a seafarer's disability becomes total and permanent under Philippine law, even beyond the 240-day medical assessment period.

Writ of Possession: Ministerial Duty vs Equitable Claims in Foreclosure

The Supreme Court clarifies when a writ of possession is ministerial in foreclosure cases and when equitable claims may delay it.

Broken Chains: How Mishandling Evidence Leads to Acquittal in Drug Cases

The Supreme Court acquits a drug possession convict due to broken chain of custody, stressing strict compliance with Section 21 of RA 9165.

Corporate Dissolution and Property Rights: Clarifying Successor Liability in Land Disputes

The Supreme Court clarifies when dissolved corporations and their officers can be held liable for delivering property titles in subdivision disputes.

Broken Chain of Custody: When Police Lapses Lead to Acquittal in Drug Cases

The Supreme Court acquitted four accused in a drug case because police failed to follow the chain of custody rule under RA 9165.

Unreasonable Search Evidence Obtained Illegally IS Inadmissible IN Drug Cases

Supreme Court rules evidence from an unreasonable search is inadmissible in drug cases, explaining why Section 21 compliance matters.

Broken Chains: Safeguarding Rights in Drug Possession Cases

The Supreme Court acquits four accused in a drug case, underscoring that a broken chain of custody can defeat the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt.