CTA Case No. 371 (Decision)
�� -v u - � 71 t � L � � � - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ cI � ti � 1i � i hv �y 1 �0 1 I' ; 6 2
.� �7 -- -- I I
� 71 .. - .. �� �� e �1 1 ec un �1 cc 11
- ~� ... 1 '� � �� � nt h l' . 65
� 71 -- � vn � t 1 uj e � 1 - � f c � - 1 � 0 1 ; � � � � � 1 0 � � n � -1 � � . � f 0 �� io 1 l ve c � fe f � n y I' � 6 6
.. � 71 -- t � ll � f w� - - n � �1 c �� c he 1 � f1 f -. n c - i� - � 0 1� y j fy --- -- - �� . 67 It I
.� 7 � t -7- - � v � � � � a 11 - � f .n 1 11 . 68
�7 -- i � 0� y f� �1 1 � 1 1 ny $ i e �� nf ev ! 11 - � n e 1 - �t i - � e 0- in 0f 0� 01 � - 0 of he e 1 1 �� � y, i ul
� 71 -- en f � � s � �-- � i � - t � c 1 v - � � ev I t i � - tJ � � ex � if � va 1 t yi � io f� 1 �- e � � -- i t - � 0y -� 1 et 1 �1 � !' 70
..,1" l� �� � . � I' 71
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 1267 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1267)
- UCPB PROPERTIES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 568)
- PROCTER & GAMBLE ASIA PTE LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2301)
- PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF CAGAYAN Represented by: MS. EMILIA L. IRINGAN, Asst. Provincial Treasurer, OIC - Office of The Provincial Treasurer v. NATIONAL TRANSMISSION CORP. (TRANSCO)(CTA Case No. OC-013)
- CTA Case No. 1820 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1820)
- CTA Case No. 2616 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2616)
- CTA Case No. 6176 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6176)
- CTA Case No. 4783 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4783)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.