CTA Case No. 3483 (Resolution)

ft~tJBltc 0" � HF. ~J.IIU!'P lNTf ~OURT 0F TA X t\PPUI-tt QlJftO" (.1 ""'( PHlLII . It~._ f LY I iilJ Il~DU..::JTi lhL O.n. OW TIO . , P titiont..-r , - ve. !:>U~ - C �T � k � Ct".. - t'L- � 3483 CL.l/ ..l._..... IG �. {; I T.J /IL RLVtl L, x - - - ... - ....... R -Sf>..2..n.d..e..nt-. x h L .., � (.., L l T I C... l'l Con i.....o ing that thi ca~ had b en previously di mi ;.)ed by the Court for loc k of inter st on the part of etition 1's coun~el tu o ecute hi~ dJ 1 in it~ r olu ion o Jun ,. t 1986' altlough the di as .._ recon-..i r d by th Court in a reh l ution d ted rJcv 26 , 1 86 itb t rn w rnin thDt si1.ilar 01 is ion or d f ult on th art of petition~r wi l not be excu~ed - ( s e v� 55 , C � i �' � EC .), and con� i.dering tt. non- t1ti n r ' ~ coun� l at th rc d- ul d he ring on t, rch 11, 1987 d spite f!ro 1 notice tht- of, vir cing di!:>r sp ct t judici 1 proc dings n dignity f tt Court , t is Court , upon 1 otion of reL.on- nt , h r y ord 1 s tt dis .is.:.>al of th b ov e. t: it 1 d ca~ for ac of int r t on th rt f petition r to p�osecut it app at . SO DLRED � tro nila, ~~Y 7.. 19 7. Qu zon Cit , ~~- / 1\, �i 1 ftitr~ ---L� \ t.;Il Judg I resic. ing Judg 162