CTA Case No. 3786 (Decision)
/ REPUBLIC OF THE PHI LIPPHlES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY DOWELL SCHLU~tBERGER C.T-A- CAi.:.J..E LN�.O_,_"_178b- (EASTERN), INC.- PHILIPPINE BRANCH; Petitioner, - versus - THE COMt'!HSSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respon<1ent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X DOWELL SCHLUMBERGER~ INC.; Petitioner, .:. versus - C.I.A. CASE NO. 4042 THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X 127
DECISION- C.T.A. C.~ NCIS. JlfN & 40112 - Page 2 - DECISION (C.T.A. Cast" No..-~;7f.6);. a.nd tlle otl1er daimirv;�-:� f::::r tllt" refUJKi or calendar v' ear 1q-[--)4 or in the alt.erna.tiVB' a. lesser arnou.nt of P3�~::.9.32 ;..63. s11ou.1cl t.lle Court. find it liaNe for contractor's tax \�.-I,.-;�1�!-lo:=-� J-�n�=�1�1-1A�-..-. 1�1-1 tt~�-l;:�:-.� .nt'tll�J-iLr,.tn-� iI�t"�.lL;::.�~�� :�-:�. t) __._, '..1' . : ) . : . tools and. ::;ePlices as a :;u.1)-contractm� of service contractors engagecl in petroleum operations in t11e Philippine�::. Tllt" f;:J.cts are FACTS: LT_A_ CASE NO_ 3766 to equipn1ent. pro'iride tl1e latter V�t1t11 cernenting ancl cut-~:r!~---~.:� --~�-�..;... �:� ;i.'�-��-~ �-' (Exh. A) On :::ame da.te. both p2.rti>2s entered irl a.not11-&r Contract 128
DF.OSION- C.T.A. CASE NOS. .jf"Wl & 4042 - Page 3 - F�NOC-EDC ~,.,ritll directional drilling'--: tools a.nd services (.E:-:1.1. e.�,'. In bot11 instances, said (Ontra.cts Vlere entered. into by l?NOC-EDC in contractor of the ~~.-cvernment under Presidential '-' Decree No. Engaged In Petroleum OperatiGns In The Under For t11e yea.r l�J:~.2. petit.ion'?.r P 1,40?,,352.00. It VI:)Uld appear from t11e recorcls that. petit.i�:)ner incurred a net loss frorn it3 oper3tion:3, covering the non-P.D. t tr1�.: ~-1J'.;l-:.:�.1�.;..:.fn�-� t�;�:-.� J lt�1�1_~.'~'...�. l..l..l't-��;)r ,,,:r:~�=- tll;::.!-;::.!"t�.--,nl 11.-1 l.ll�.�_,'.�I.."_.,in1;�:-.� �"-�""' '1 �-��-� 1jp;:. . ..., --� ..... .a...t. � �-� �- -l. �-� EDC on services rendered by petitioner V�litll respect to J?:NOC- t�.,,,. fE'"' ��"'tll the. f'l""l.!"'l �'�!" 1 F''i ttlc. �-�-0. L .f..;-~.....!- .1-':~::f..1. 1�-�t� 1�!:._l t._. _..:~.a:�:c. "'�-�'l"':~:"�~-i-l't.... 1 �:~..r ~i\'i. .� .~.._. lY�~'-l~"r)'!".�_.'�\i�..1J�.:��'-~~�~"11+:-_. i..~..t....} -�.&. .... ..:\..1. .
l DEOSION- C.T.A. CASE NOS. J78q & 4042 I - Page 4 - IlOVEL SC:HtUYBERGER {E.!STERJf _t INC. - PHILIPPINE BRANCH SCHEDULE Of !AI VITHRILD BY CLIENTS DECE11BER 3 1, 1982 f,0.1nf~Pn'-P ��"D' 1-1~"-'">�x-") :RTF.: No. C.E. Ho. Amount L:c~ "'?Tithheld PHGC-EDC ~./ l O/B2 924E;722 * p 3}7. 6~!9.09 6/10/f.'Z 94992:,7 * �:.a]1 . 1J6.6~i 9/10/B2 9376704 9163699 �:;: 764:207 .tr3 1n iif�.o'R? - �-� I .:. ._f{ �-�o...~ 9999314 Y37..91B 00 1014078"3 103~~�33~,9 7. G9B. 200.;t1 204H37.15 11/10/82 10182549 161..2(6.29 12/10/82 103:13663 2'. 57:.:. 55t:.3t: 1~,t:, .037.21 1062B9B.3 2:015 .. 066.13 10629297 1.962.114 ::;-:; i i� i I Less: Taxes daime<i tm<ier P.D. No. 13~:.4 retu.t':t1S 290.141::;9 ! TOTAL CLAJl.,.IABLE TAX C:REDIT IN NON-F.D. 13~�4 RETTJRNS p 1. 407..3:�2 .00 290.14 1.-=:9 - C18Hoed under P.D 13~i4 returns ~:uch c:lain1. Hence, C.T .A. CASE NO. 4042 16� J the f.ure-au of En.:?.rgy Devdopm:S-nt.. enters--::!
// DEC5ION- C.TA. CAS.r. NOS. 3789 & 4042 - Pare 5 - 0 I Philippine Branch, petlt.ioner in t.lless- t.V�lO �:~ases. t:) do the drilling and cer:nenting . .PNOC-EDC (Ez1L .e). J>stit.i�)ner ::;.greed. to provkie the labor. second and t11ird qua.rt;:,.r:; of 19,:}4 (Ex1E C- 1. D- 1 ::.Ed. E- 1) and Receipts (Ezlls. C-2, C-.}. D-2., D-5. E-2 and E-5) Aside fr�:)m the contr3.ctx�s t3.X it :paid directly to tlle. BIR, PNOC-EDC V�iit.1l1leld (E:z:1E. C-7 t:) C-19.: F-1 and F-5� to F-13). claim for refund v'litll the fHR in the amount of F�S ~:, 1. 9.3� 1.76. 1(_,.'.�"�.�'�~"'� 1..'.-� 1�s pet...'1t.'..1oner �s opm� 1�on t..~11ar... a.s a :;u~t)-C�::'!th+-.rac._+.- c�r L�., 1�:3 nor.�. liable for contractor's tax under Sect.kn1 205 of ths T::.u: Cod.e. 131
DF.ciSION- C.T.A. C.AJ'""E NOS. Jl'ir1 & 404.2 - Page6- p 11,9f�4.654..3.3 Le~s: Eeceipt; p::tid out of proceeds of fon:+;,r,n lo.::1.rr.:: contra.ct.ed bv I ~ P.NOC-EDC pursu.ant tD P.D. # }~~4 as amended bv P.D. # ':�72 v.rl1id1 I - 7..o.:::.:..05�2 ..:::.3 a.rs- ezernpt iror.n c~:)ntr::1_(:tor\:: tax Eeceipts v..rhidl are merely 16<\042 .f-:.4 rechan;,res tc� or reirnbursements '.J from PNOC-EDC Gr(:.::s Receipts V.Jhich ;::;hc)uld have been subjecte.J to contractor�::: tax P 4.7~~.\~..-~.7.91 Contractor's Ta.x Due p -I.-_. 1') 1 ~} f,(i(-., Less: Contra.ct:)r':; Ta~r Paid �.r �-� �-�. ._) c:. 1 ;f, I �;>} Claim for Refund (l -~ l I .._, J L . i .,. f ���t�-, t�� y t .- 0 1�'- ~- l.]li P....��"=�-'i�}�t�)�t�lr-l...+:�:�-:�.�U��. t...1+1..r.-_l+ ,--t "-� .tL�,..,.J-..} ..� t..t-1l.-'::.::: �l�.:-:~:.r�nL-ut.-1(-.1. !,,.. -:'.i~.J-..l-..l 1f1�1�t�::�;'t..,-&l. ... ;�:-'-j'�:- ..r } fd���,-1 24.. HAt-'���� r���titi�.-,.-;::.1- i~lJ,�-l-:.jl~_i.~~i'--"-1�v�1�!�1�'�:�:�'-1. ~-.� 1'-.. t:;'�, ;...'' -�� � >._.tl._. i~':::'-. (�.�!11 J'.!Yl.Jf.O.~.t-1-�1~-~;1 L .' 132
DELJSION- C.T.li. CASE NOS. 3789 & 4042 -Page 7- ISSUES= CT.A. Case flo. 3766: ��rr1t t�.:=.f1 1�,-. ".l..ill"'tll~!- !I .::::- �� .... r",t� ,l.,. -.� ��� In�.�.:..:...t�l. .t.-l�,-..- -,..!. ��-r� ~...F -=- ~..�.. �L1t1-.� t1...-~.�--�-t�-� t�..J-'..). t,_1. �.i.��~-� �-� ~-1�.5.11-.r.+l ,.�.�..11� �.��.,. for its non-Presidentia.l Decree N�). 135.4 services for the year , C.I.A. Case No. 4042: o . H'.'T't.�H��e tJ"'l�e�t� <�_:.�t 1�1,_�:.t_. p~~.~..H_.-,(;:..!tl�!�:�"l� 1�:-:> e��l�l t...1t..le""cl t.. r�.}I�e� t��e1�Ut�!�t1 o�f 133
I DECISION- C.T.A. CASE NOS. Jl89 & 4042 - Page8 - C.T.A. Case No. 3786: The lavr:; applicable in this case are Sections� 1 and j(a) of Presidential Decree No. 1354 (~8.pri1 21, 197,3) and Section l(e) of Revenue Regulations No. 13-7�3 (SE>ptember 7, 197>3). Sedions 1 and .3(a) of Presidential Decree No. 135.4, �sECTION L EvE>ry subcontractor, ~,qhethE:>r domestic or foreign, entering,_, into a contra(:t y~vith a service o:mtrador whetht:.-r national or local: I'f~n-=:kl&fi. .J~'()H�PV&I; tl1at anv in\>)!11!:? reco&>ived from -3.11 c�ther sources vvithin a.nd �without tlle P�hilippine�:; in the cas& of dornest1C ��-==�__i,_l.h...(. -..(.l..!.�ltl-�-=\.~.;.(..�.,.tr,.),.r. ��:._�1 �\,=.,1.�.�1�1..-...-i \l�,i�!�tt.-..l,.1J.�!-1 ~l'J--.~.,.::._:.. P�1�1� il1:�;:n� :r;.1J � .t..�.�1,:.:..:. .-c� 1-fl t_t-J1. ,::..:.... ..-..-..-..-..:.1...-"='"-.,.:.:.:.. of foreign subcontradhrs sh:::tll be subject tc� tr1E:- rt:-�2'u1a.r incomE:- ta:K � url(ler t11e Natir_::,nal Interna.l Revenue Code. The tenn ",z_,ny;::; incorne" me::u1-:: a.11 i!Korne earned or received a.s a result of the contract entered into b~l the su1xontractm� .,,vtt11 a :::-s-rvi.ce B-nf�-!1;:J:f_>� '?.d contract in 1... :::.etroleu.m �:)T.>erations in the .L Philippines under f:Te::;idential D&cre& No ,:p ,=�ur�-r�11. l,�.�n....rl.--.l.,.:.:..:..!�,.=...,........-...-):-r1.�!�1~o: ~, t-. r-� ;.._:.:.�;~'1 ..'J "'::r' 0::1' "':::.'!' ~-"" ~-" ~...:..l.~.t. .:�~ .i~ ..:":c. ..:::. ...:~ EvE:-ry servi(e G(:.ntra.c:tor shall dedu(:t, V�lith1i.o1d_, and pay thE:- t:tx impose(i in Section 1 of this DB-cree from the amount.:=; Daid bv tlie ::;ervice- contractor t\::. tt.te- ':;ut:n:>:)ntra.ctor L t' 11e contract ent.er.:::-cl into t�y ;::md Uti'::ler t:;E:-t~.veen tllern in the ::;ame rn:::mner ;Jnd ::,ut�ie<:t t;) the ~A of tl1e 134
DEC6ION- C.T.A. Ck:;lr: NlJS. 3W & 4042 - Page 9 - 7 197(:,), [Supplemented by Rev. Rs-gs. N�.::. 6-79 d.a.te.d Ju.ne 4. ftsection 1_ Income payments subject to withholding tax and rates prescribed the:reiiL - E.7...(..�.;..::�:��..f,�.�.�,t� �"=--'-���-~� 1-1-~;:�::.!-.-._:.:.1�!-.,. n..t.1.��1;:.:_:. .!-,I.,rk�-�-;:::,:_.. rr-�"t'�r�v.~;l�.rl;._:::......-..-.1-' "-.1Jh.J;.::.:_.�t.�1.;::-:..�. �._:.:1\�1~�..~..~..1. 1 h"'-.�::�.:_.. 3f-:;B(ifiB(l f(:=r e;::i_ct'.t cL:t3E; (::.f ~);~.;lee fr�)tll t.11e f.-_:;11~)~.:\~itlg: items C�f income payment:: to pe.r:3ons resid.ing in tlle Philippine::;: ":7 -=::r "'::"" ..:":t. .:C.~..:~ (e) Amounts paid to certain contractors_ n�-1 ,-. t.--, ttl;::. f(��ll(�,"'rl�t�lc; r�..-.. �-� i 0 ~i(��,-��:�:-:��~=-�: r1;-'�:0-..n?�l��l�i;:.:..:. ...t.�lt.�J'"-":�J. -''-~' '.....L. v �-� 'J I� i::) �., '<I' r;.L+t1�.-�L::,_.,,_�._�,��t-�r��-�.t��-~~�� 1"1-lfll" (�,t� T\ 1'-Tl.ti-.,L;�.:.�::..,t.1~-1{-:~:.[ {.,_'�{�.,�. ,r�,rt)'..._,-...�!r'�-:'-:..t..iJ.(�~J..1-1 - t.t.-�J.l�r� ;.:,_::.,;�::.r:, ,���.:;,~; �:-.1 ni,"l11 .,_ ~l i. �� -�- 1~� .i.. .... ~.r,_��,�:�:.;._. J.-�� !l.>�L.;fr-:l-."i.>l ":..� ...:.!.J ~" -~1"a::�,. \.j.-t�}. ( 1) (.TenBE11 engineerinK general 1)U.i1ding and specialty contractors - Sed.ion 1 of PrE>:;ldentia.l Decree No. l.YS4 n1ah~es it plain tlla t. t.11 e incorne tax refers to v�.:."-. 1�rr-�; ,;'1. ~1-h,--..�--�.'1-I-l �-- derived 1-t.:-:>. ;�.-~.=~� �--:;�.� frorn :;erviee >.:::' All other income. re.ce.ived frorn sources c�tller than pe.trole.urn t�� ....,._, _ _ -r���� r�.,.TT \�.�)�r)-\�:�;:�"�!"�~.�---�-.�t�;'-~-'.1�1-::.:--. .L-.--:1+V-.:-t.:.=-�. .�-:U-- ,. ,�=-�.�,-1-f-;J._-I.\:,;.:"-1._.-..1._.. A.' 1.-!LI:::' 1���t-::>��0:rl-1��1-�:.-1.�.1-1�11,<._-...\) Ilt::> .�:<..';. "L1i.~-l-<l.-�<-7-r t.-ti 1f~:3 '<:;:" Nat.ion;:1.l Internal Re.venue Cede. In relatlon to this. Sec:tic�n 1(e) 135
DEOSION- C.TA. CA....CJ! NOS. 3189 & 4042 - Page10- general l:uilding and specD.lty r:o!lt.ractors. Thus, for w:m-F'.D. U5A :3ervices rendered ty petitioner t;:) PNOC-EDC, the latter should ha':.re vlith11e1d only� 3.$ instecv1 of (~;~: final i1E0n1e tax non-F�.D. C.T .A. Case No. 4042: The word ~Nhen or not restrained by the <:ontext or particular T,qc,rds. may mean a sub- contractor, or anv nerson,remotelv eng"aged under contract and , I I; I W- T�T()!"l�� <'� jr�-,~i-+-J-..l;l-E,:�, t�h._,,.:..:_.. 'f'l-..��,_._, _.,.,~ ~f�j'l.'f:,:J-11 ,.,.,~ t:e..i.1�1,:-:.... (v"\1"1.!;"~!'1ll.+'"-�\;:.11 1-..".,.'�.") !lt+-�.�1.C-.I..�r..��.�.J.t.:,". lf . .'..~)1.1.r..�_i.�l1... C".-l. p~,"":':' .r;.:--\J.~n Q.j s:l,.:) >;�r,::.ll tl�,.,.. {Ept"fant�o G 1��::: ,.~,.-,tltr�a.-~t.-�,�� -::~.::: -:j ,_l :_._ '..1' �..; � ' - �.;> J ....,. ,L l(.t,._, If\: �-� Ia�,~j 1... '�' '''�!'�1�.-;,::..;J!.1-.�.::.>l. l ��..�..-.,_r, 'tlt..r_.�-(~},,r�.�.�t,..���..,- r� , - GonzalesR .National Internal Revenue Code, 1984 Revised Edition~ p. 527.) It v.ras formerly held that a contract.')r and t�a�:-r,-.y,::.r�,-. _., r,�ar�,., . . '".�_�,J.�'l. 't-.1. -r.�_. ,_~_\.Lt}f�'.f~.��.1.r"._.�tt'�.)!�� ,�::<'_._�!�,::.,_. 1'fl,-�"� lP�.� n!'.".::.' -.!��}("lJ''f}t~ /. L>.I:' �:\ ' ��� �J <:..�t..lf��-l~ u~.~t�.:�;.:,, ~.:.�<,::>, r���C. 0. tP...l.T'T/ tax::1.ble. The pa.yment of the c:Nltn:v~tor�s tax by tlH prime 136
-DEC'JSION- C.T.A.. C~"'"E NOS. 3789 & 4042 - Page 11 - ,' � ,,,, t:~.x. (P_ J. Kiener Co.� Ltd. v. Commissioner of Internal ~ ,f , Revenue, G.R. tlo_ L-16417, January 31, 1963. 7 SCRA "T11e term 'gross receipts�� tne:3.ns all :3.rnounts r�,r.. .-��,-�;!Jlff"::";,��-tr�,t� r-�,t�1� tt1;:, it"I(�t'n�::-11 t�;:,.���.::::.i;~,::.f�i 1 -.� -...,.�.�. .1. ......._ ~1--.J-l~7 t.t.�1l.:.:.... ..�.!. 1��r�l;..:..,. !�"-�;.t1-� .t-� I-" .!. �-� J--~ �-- .... �-� �-�- �-� .t�..� l . �3,0:: �.1 .., �- �-� total C(mtract. r.ri<::>?. undirninislled bv ::J.rw::.unt !Y::dd to !. . " - the �:::;ubcontr::1d.or undt?.r a. subcontra.ct ;:UT:.'lngement.. Any� portion of the t..Aa1 contract prke ;Nhich is paid tD t11e �::::ut<(:C�nt.r.::v::tcT. 3lla.11 be exclude(! fro:::,rn t1w taxable gr(:::::�:::: rs<:eipts cf tlh:: sut-<.�:)ntt:=Jct(:.r:;. (1\s ::n::.1s-nded by P.D. Nc. 145� 7.). case of Dravo Philippines. Inc. v _ c~)mmissioner of Internal Revenue.. C.T.A. Case No. 3487. September 15.. 1989 -:"1�=: 1-<-)ll,'l~:.!C:� ;J 1--.�-� �~ ~ '�' I I �-� � "�.v.::�.. ..a.::.~... ."s:":"~�.. Tl�-1.::��:�:.. ��-=' �t~-..=__-tt��1'-J�t.�:-:��:~:�. �c..}-rr-.�.�co:;::,:�-::_-1�_11�!1'C..�-�' c-�~�!� t}..�...~_,:,:_.. r�.r;r-tt�r,t�r ,-.,1- t}�1.::::. J._.-�.... �-� �-� ..... �-� -�.L �-� contract price paid to tlw subcontrad�::;.r under a sgurobscsonretrcaecipt t;s:t-l�2oTf &sueem:lelnst uabsceoxnctrluacdteodr. irom the taxable Accordingly. for t11e B-xclusion t;:) a.p_p~y, it is enougll tllat. the gross .. ')f r� 1.J�:"::�"(._".t.:,;':1�lr)�Jt,.-j. �~ :"<r�-v._ t~�.i�.l1._i'.-.�:.,.:.:... 1... u:=\. ,�=-�.�-,t.,h._.!�.,....�l.JJt."J�.lf_t.".:.:.:t.j!�.�...�t,..�.)�.i�.. �-:J:'<.l"l�!.�_J t-ll�~,_~.TlT t�)��r�rl�. l part of the portion c.f the total contract price of the prime or principal contractor paid to ~31J.dl subcontractor. That tile ~:ub.:::�:::rntra.ctor may be an independB-nt. contrador, to our tnind. is th>::orB-fore of no rrwment. It seem:; c:lea.r tlE1.t the philosop11y behind the 'B-~�~(:lusion is t() minirnize thB- effects of doublB- tazati::)n (:;f the sarne gr<Y:s re.:::eipt;;_ .. 137
�I DE.as.ION- I C.T.l\. CAJI! NOS. JlS!1 & 4042 - Page 12 - PNOC-EDC (principal C�:)nt.ra.dor) G�r a total of F�5:31 . 931.76 ...,N::J.s bet.-.:,~.,re.en PNOC-EDC and petit.i:�)ner as sub-cont.ra.ctor. Section 205 petitioner as sub-cont.ra.ct.or a.re excluded from it:: ta:mble gross I n ��1 r� 1�� t11 tl1 BI t- .... , t11..., �"11 :i �� Il 1.+'..--.:":t ..�...+...~'=1:.\��.�111 1-'..-J. tJ.- 1�--'=-::'1-1-1� '... .i.. ':::."'�. 'rt�1� ~ --:i t l~i:j _. .".D~ _, J�. .......:~.:~.a:~. t,_.�':;''�._ _ �:t ... �:J. tlleir cc�ntrad V�litll FtTC'C:-EDC. Since the gn)ss receipts paid to petitioner ::J.s sub-contractor ;3.re excluded under Section 205 of t.l1e. Ta.z Code, then tlle same ~.llould not be subje.:ts-d to the contra.dor�s tax_ Only the otlwr receipt..:; earned by the sub- ccmtrad.or~ as prime .c,:.nt.ractor i�; :;ubject to the contract.�:T':; tax_ . .�-,r- �=l'�=-1'l c. 1-t��-��n1 t-f�ic. t�:>v'=-hlc. 1-c..-'c.l�p,t�= ,-,f the. -,~,11t-ra�~~~ .......... .a. '�" i.. '�.� �.r��� 4 �.j l�:J, .&. it,-..� '�-� c'�.'~,.i:,.&..,'�-.-�l-1-,�]��,.-+i'c�.' ,'���j �._,� J..a..� �-� .0. ��w� ....:.\.d;;;.�:r. r.,�' -,.I' Cl'Jt.t..... ,_ ..,� ���-' ._,.... '�' .,_., ..,_, J..:. 'w'.A..a. '�.� �-1 contractor_ i:1...11 the proceeds ea.rned from its S1..!.1J-contrad. agreement ~Nitll PNClC-EDC does not form pa.rt of the gny:;s re(:ei.pts netitioner .::J.s ' sub.ject to the ,-::on tractor's ~3ub-cont.ractor ('f ~ tax. Pe.t.it.h::.ner is entitled to t11e refund claimed in the ::J.mount of J:�� l_:"}..-), 1"'.1.'-.-:.~-), i" i~ ... � 1. i' �.). WHEREFORE. in 'lie~.v of tlle foregoing_, the petitions hr GRAf{TED. Respcndent. i:3 hereby ordere.d t-:~. refu.ndin f::l7or ')f
DECISION- C.T.A. CASE NOS. 37'89 & 4.042 - Page 13 - ser7ic'3':: lJ.nd.er C.I.A. C;3.se t�i(� ..~:.7e6 In addition, respondent is also orciered to refu.nd in favor �:)f petitioner tlw a.nl(:>tmt of No o,:.sts c�f suits. -.p-<# RA~.Nr 0. DEVEY -.A SO ORDERED. As~;ocf;::~_te Ju.d!d�--�& WE C011CUR: I' / CERTIFICATION ~Q_.~ ERNESTO D. ACOSTA 139
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. VMC FARMERS MULTI-PURPOSE COOPERATIVE(CTA Case No. EB 2856)
- ROLLS-ROYCE POWER VENTURES (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7705)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 401)
- CTA Case No. 2357 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2357)
- ORICA PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2336)
- ORICA PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10152)
- EXCEL CONCRETE LOGISTICS INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10695)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1018)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.