CTA Case No. 1972 (Decision)
~ ., C , . l . ! U I 'PPI"'i '~8 : I. ' I, j r I ; �: \ ,\. c1 j' p II!:>\ L.-:: QliLbUt' CITY :I. .L!..;..Y.. ,M~uJ..~iJ �.n.. ' !.L.t.!NC Cv ., Ix~.., ., P�� t t i Jl".:Ol' , ersu - 1 - - ~� � � - ~- - - - � A T... , {) s i .lin ~..<o .' Inc. . , in .f.tWttt' ..,.. Au��ociat��\4 ~ut;a:r, c . an . ;.1 . ~ i-Q If' � { cl~cl 1�. the t!f.:..t'GtO. (: Uf.ll..rt; t or .c l~ , 2!jo .. <~o ll S &Vi,. GilC ;d by !~o .. r "Olttlhers vJb.icb. ,t<l),a;o . u.J . Opon r . t'usal oi' r spondent �t.o h�� ve tbe C �r t � r t'e �
CISHY' C ---� CA... " �...., ., 19 7 2 It 1 s _) - tllol "f' ' - ." ti r r r r 11 � r t1 - r~:: ., in .. " lli. i v..-i ""c ...!on 1 - ~h 0 u .- R.r�v n ~ l c f P ~- Tl , o�ly .. ' ' tory c . ... ~ f n( r -1. .... .. .. " llc�.vl �1 � :ri .... 236
,. ~C.P': . . - G , Cf~ ;r .... � �J )'72 � ~:t.oss.... s r.;:rana.- �"i 1~ ' �.c I ('1 J !'\ ~ ~ !, pl. �r e:1a . n ":" t., '.::5( ... ...:.. th~ s i- lr th c:.~e 0 0 .... t(" e 1 c� r cf nt c~ of � . ..,_ ith a, !" ---ch� s ric of �� 5 .. ,.,.., \.! �l�.n- 76 , 0~f . 6 1 ' 11� �"l .. � I ' ' . '' "' ,.. . n~ r~ f.. ~�f; &., s 0 i f� s -~ rf'f J ct .. ,.., ~~ '- ru' � '':.St � r ..1 � c.un ... 01 ,._�"" c 1 :ft? 1 ... ~ .-1 6C, th- . r � �f "I f.o.. r� 1 nu(" -
Cr. .. .... ,... ~.' 1 r. ,._~ O.i. 'ttl 1: -'"�r' .. ,.. � .ic� .. ..,ct . c . ;r:-p~ t t 0 ! , lch 1 1 "' 0 l l t 0 ~~c.~ (;. ::-ti.:.;co U!!{' rJ I� '- o.: i� "'' '1"' n ( (:. .T� !7 tue ��f 1 ' .. . f i ;= 11 , ~ � b.~ - r 0. ~ of h" rr � !~~'-I' c 'l o:!: on p r i.i 3 :~ 'l :f) st --t t�o�"'r ( 152, r ,., n .. t �t . CJl (' d ">'I j ( l )I ) y rif � ,. 2.38
......,,. � ...ran .J artio .. '"'lay b- 1. t ha th t 2 . o�H~ Jun o 't t r.-6 ant! JU.fl/3 11 t 1963 , :� ~.� :.. .. . . .r . .;."to:rt il ' i~ nz ~ , -n rvl ~nun _l tl. iC:=lf'l". or t1!'l . fro:... , te:'!' t "\" I . ~ 239
"L"."'~ ~j._�,! _"'i? .~"-' ~.r,Ll;.: ;~ ~ � 1~472 CM + ;-: ~� Cu ..� ,. i~tt{:,.. ~ ... . ~"� 1 ':13~ , 1. r~,.. . ! ..~... , ,.:;. 'l-'-'h~~"' �~ s~. #!' 0 t ,f di tN: and ~ ... nt t o j t,!! t J.' 1c er. 5 to of' 240
or�' IS-I ....1 .... C..1 �5""' Nc . 1Wt2 7 v.lu � oh 2 4�1 \.j}
' t' ~ ( to h th .""t..., r rei~ . . 't.t., th 242 �-
c 10 T:-' C,\ J � 1972 9 .� th .nt � ~c , w��ich ... t t ol s t �Ct 1 Y 1 2 -- ,. - 15_ 213
- � r icl ' t 0 X�~-.; rs,. ' oc .1.ol "'U .. � t - - (''(H:; r, U~ � c+w: r 1 r r' 0 . - 'lCtr t , .cv ao 0r' l �.. .. t I" 244
11 .1'.~ v { .. 11 h ... 150 of 1-..... i. - t to '"' .d ch .., i 1 ' .'o.,� !'OS ' 7 245
' l .b �l ... Cl A /Uii::. '. � l 7J. r1 1 ace � t t.b t all tb pu cila J. �r s, a ~o. hat t h d.1 till f{. t>J\J> - ~~ ~- eei ' .d only �or ,.Q !1 ~.;al l ~:lr od 19.. Sf..~.G 0 1~ $SO$ t~ ::!at:OlO .- M� �uia 1.l1n';.: , Inc . and nol!e :;-;o-m o�ttl(),': f!'ourc� rs i 1 1 ~u~ ~ic cl 1 its l s t tL r y th "J J , . ot t t� �"'v .n 1 t e e n n <1 f 1 2�4 6
.. t on o:..,nt , it 1,;:. 1' ...y c 2 47
1;. c�t~1c~: c b. CJ... ~ ' ...... . 1�'72 in 24 8 .
t zj 1 f .t' t . t.~ t.:.J r +. i t l. � 1 t .. 249
- ; ~r corsi ci. r ti r it c :. ~~ � 2 1 1~' / 16 f r ��~ ,. ���'. o ~�L� . �.-. s~cc ~ tP ; 1Q ~. ~.
More in CTA Decisions
- AXIA POWER HOLDINGS PHILIPPINES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8464)
- CTA Case No. 149 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 149)
- UNIMASTER CONGLOMERATION INCORPORATED v. TACLOBAN CITY GOVERNMENT, PRIVATIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OFFICE, PHILIPPINE TOURISM AUTHORITY and PROVINCE OF LEYTE(CTA Case No. EB 901)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-90 (Decision)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-90)
- NIPPON EXPRESS PHILIPPINES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11111)
- CTA Case No. 604 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 604)
- NORTHWIND POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9202)
- SUMISETSU PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1352)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.