CTA Case No. 71131 (Decision)
1\EPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPIN:mt COURT OF TAX APPEALS --- MANILA ' � � � � � - � � � � � � � �X CIS I 0 T i i a atm file by the t l!C of t 11 pin in t � , � � stat o � � , � c ��� publ . cla:Ua ally f1l in � ill 11 fort Court f �Of � 1la. .suant to 8 tion 22, pu lie o. 1125, t e a r- (I 0 0 z:t or final i& o 1 1 n. Th or of t e estate f!l a tion o f. i s i $;t& . o - the gJl'ound' that this Court ba n Juriadic io . o t � ca � an f x-t �r inter , �� deftnst t at the gov nt�s s already rr . Y pr rlption. On tb f1r nd thl Court 1n its �solution f July 7, 195-~, held that it ju~lsdlcti n er t � �~�� . n� �� r�gards the a - - ~o gr nd d fen the in tion the of to the rits. r the nt� into th follo - ing �et.tpulatio - facts an aubntitt �d the e s , for dec1stonr 213 . ...
r /� l I" . � 71131 - 2. is 1� ' t a.ti fi , 214
..... 3. c; � i � to ~��T_n � er a in tat ion J. � n th t t - t t 0y f a ser th t cl f not t�n 1 � 215
DEC IS � � Il.A CIVIL �ASE o. 71131 � 4 .. carr sz:ondin r ly r t in t h re character as co pl int n { 11 H Y-Oo I 65 il . 52 and th fa il r to n be r und for a judgi L1t by default . Iiow . in tr tor ha ac ually i l e his ns ITer cl i. ...n th ame �ay b t en s 1 . v ...., n ft r th pe... iod (Lama v� p cibl � 79 6 ) In d ). ion, v.e "ind i~ r on � le to that any o j cti n t~er to h uld .be e by e f c ha t cla \n p blic of t e hil� ipp s olunt~rily 'ril t reply to l ans v r of the dministrator. A reading of c l im nt ' s r pl y 111 readily o th t it r ly cont ins ount - ' s t at ement to the defense of pr script ion pr s nt d by the "'dministrator., �� inalJ.y , not e that th c laimant t.a not , by 1 otion . s d for ju nt of def ult (se 5 � 6, R 1 35, ul of C ur ) an i fa~ t no j dgme t y d f ult nor approv 1 of cla � b en ren red by ths Court of Fir t ! nstanc at t t� is cas s r an t i ourt. , f t hQ%' f r th cont nt i o of . claimant t hi prel iminar y issu as 1thout m r i t. oce i 9 t th pr i e ipal i Sll here involv d, ot her under t p rtin nt ortions of s tio 'lS l, 3 1, 32 nd 3 of th l: tional Int rnal I. v nu od ich e i nvo ed ere a !;)ec. 51 . X X X X 216
� ILA ,. � 71131 X X 217 tl ' l
� I � e tn cc d a. ith t . i s ! .$of t h Cou ( oll c or v. H goo � ~ h lippi tat nt Co. v. o ad s , 6 hil. 2 6} n t. i t (V c n J. Franci co v. oll ctor. c. � � , o utl on d d. r ch 18, 1955 c _t . � t o � 1.� 8997 , April 12, 1 55; A. P. R~y s � � olle�tor , � � � c � 2 a r ar s h ap. c V Ol.l � plie tion f ec.tion 51, P r. . ) of he d t o le t r of t nt r na.l n ha ... t hr e (... ' ars f r t l f ilin of h axp y r ' a inco- ta r t ur s wit h whic h to as s t he inc tax and coll �-t s ry � t ods of dist raint and levy. In h ase t b r ~ th .come �t ax return for l 6 s filed on I'l y 15, 1947 an �th c orr s pon in9 at , r . 1 , "'ti- . ulati"n of Pa ts ) so h t , th �th:re -year porio i t hin � ic to x r is~ he urn.nar y nethods of o lee � on of 1r�d on ;.� y 15, 1 .. � T. er ft r th only s:-� y avai l ul for t. purpose of c llectin the tQx i ility s b, � dic ial cti n , i: hic h .-cti n h d t be f l e on r efQr ay l , 1952 or five {5) y ars y 15� 19 7 t t o:f h f il �ng of 218
.nd t e ss s nt � f t th. . t rant of is �aint 1 . ' az.y 15, . 19-e2, hie h 12., 19 2. th a �ithout any f si n t t n., lo g r 1 5 ( ) it in e ec, i n 51 (d) of 't r x c . pro- vi$lon � ltca let � :tnco s �1 n � it. . st con� rol v r � 3 is �� g n x �1 o all 1n � r a r~v u ta..xes.. x- a.n ev nt, ran of 1 y et' 12t 1952 coul - d d t hav re te any r bt 1 f v t e go rnme t in vi of th fae that t Collector o� Inter al � ve u ha aile 0 ly 1th th X dr.n:e und $ t Oft .1 � 1 d 2 .. 32:.:> d'e, v� h ld to b ly rv �� ( !a � Caitro v. "oll c a � li � 141, Le lu 1 ate � $1" ..., l ' 1 55 � ln his , n r t rb f'Jf � �� tl s ription f th . :rope:rty iz d nor f tbe t 1 d n t . sal to at1$fy t gov rn ot' 11 c or ould n t h ve a;qui ed any ri ht v i -. ac:cordenc t1t h a � ar ant f 1 trai :t an � levy issu d by th t x aut riti is analo oua to a l vy o xeeutl r fi al attac t ( s u. � v. . ttll , e, u. . 247, L. �� 421) a li the 1 t� t r tb 1 suan of th -rrant f dis raint nd le 219
ta not al n� s� ff.i$1 �n t ye' e ef .tin 1 f t t a:t t the � n fit 0f s. � Uo of t a.x o.d .. . � inti thta c: o nti �� � wit t r!t... lind'% .. t.t alt Cod , Col ector of K�1rem����. lt ur � 1y to '1 � h y y distraint 1 vy a in � o . y 1� t ~ollKt %' . ar � t rlod f:r �nf ft , � c 11 i c ually tri ai a 1o � �ect-1� of t ' of 11� ati � st � one w r neith ~ j dicial � �1- il' � f � and o h� 1 � t t y t � stat t f 1 it t ... n 220
I t I f DEC IS I ,.. .. IU"W.,.�.,"" t CIVIL CA � I I' I' c 11 ction f h inco :c� 1 bil:tty �of ant $ecti n 1 , pub ic t . o. 1125. !are that th� r is o d fie ncy of ch i1 o t _,x,� L t la�m cf th ov r n ' it i hout pronou .c 0 s. 11 � PhU pi c , June 11, 1 5 , c iate Judge 0 � I di not t ke p rt. 221
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 535 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 535)
- JINNA MARIA O. YAP vs. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10019)
- DEUTSCHE KNOWLEDGE SERVICES, PTE. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1763)
- PHILIP MORRIS PHILIPPINES MANUFACTURING, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8791)
- CTA Case No. 4126 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4126)
- FORTUNE TABACCO CORPORATION, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with Case No. 6365 & 6383)(CTA Case No. 6612)
- CRESCENT PARK 14-678 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1068)
- CTA Case No. 5312 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5312)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.