CTA Case No. 236 (Decision)
r( I __. l TJ F PliTLlPPl"U l l�.A �" - sua c. r.A. �2 x- � - - � � - � � � � � � - -x C I~ 1 1a ts an ap al ln er ed y the etltl a ld , L tea n Vlole , all ..��� n- � rla � e on el n , n � a of .tal uat a1n �0 p �� nting n fuel U ua 1n the puat etl� tlo era� t � ou d r decl e hat era are en a � in hU 1ne c astwi tra e an there� entttl t he ~� n f � � f the 1 1 pine Tarif c~ f 1 , t � .~:eap tnatee o refund to �t� al co�� w.ta� iic�n�� fees in the unt of 1, pal y th to the ure at � sine� 194 up t the present n all their fi htn f the eviae " . 395 LjtJI
I � 36 - 2- c 11 � ,- ci e aatwl�� 11 �n�� .ln h futu.r � t � c :tr v facts f e c ae. � ' �� r f.n r all 0' Il r (8 f ., 1�� 1 an f!ve � - )CC � n .t' ter �� cul ly o a � ly ��� yt � �� 11 �� � cle ��� The pet1 11k iv C 1�� 2, 1 � � 1'1 1 � unt at 1se �� �ir ive t 1: 396
13, 19~ , 1 It 1 - 2, � 1n n ro CO I 1 1n1u � 1 �. 9:J � f 1 1 0 19 � lt1n ) y Ju tlc �� a tho 1 y n 1n ., 397
� 23 �4� oa 1:1.. 1 7 p � sh u c atw s trad � fu � at 'tit ra � o.. a and u er u l': au � 11 0 � 1, 0 v s ls fr l re not th f n fe l. � �� 11...rl.� . ��tt Cf)Ul - � 01' t � pur - art 1 1c � r 1l n � ., .. 39 8
-- t 11 p n 1f fe eI � - � �1� � 399
� 23 - 6- vi , lle on t the h nd. for � on h� fu�l oil 0� ec ion 21 f n strlng�nt l te �� �� t %' ppt 1fi tn th v ry � ... . . . 15 fr: fund o . c ( nt e of t 1 Lnt ot l to th ureeu t V G �1 fr 1949 t t can on ette t. 0 tn ifull in:f. i� 1 ~ of A ry f Ju i.e (E 1 A) . 0 1c w ully � �r� to � f;"t ha 1n of ., . 1100
� 23 � 7 .. no a � � (clt1n he � .... 3� 46)�. 282 �� 1 ., l � 1 1nac ate. ( .) �" ) ..... � KS' 1 oU con �� \1\1 t f �� �� ntf. � 11 t.� t �� � enel"� ny ~�� S'lctton allf cat.l � 4 01
�2 �- � t �f eaa1 1 f htl ine iff c:t of 1 at � \1ve r er � 157 hi.ch too 12. 19 2, entln � for r. 1n � cl re un 0 � bac � on el 11 c ld be 1� 1t ely rante � the ola!laant t px-ove ina (a) ha hf. vealel ts en a ed r � � or (b) etween ts 111 - pine Iela tra orei n coun ��' nited � 1~7. f their in o the n olle t llo1 o. f t ti nera' cl� re un � ( � � ���n. ) nl eat1 �t las e. theref r�� ls e- �~ he flah1n vessel� of petit nder category (c) of ecti 21 of t h!lJ.pplne 402
� -. c� tf.- f) � ., f� � /I -11 � pl - � �� c 1M l .�. . ) 11 in 11 3 i3 403
� - - l 11 c t 1� tr i�� t 1r n I r rt fan a 1� ~ to c �� 1 hl 'Y 1 r tof 1 f vr t t on � f ct th t t ov ~l xt nd�n h� c t duti rn 11 d r c: .. c 0 n y � -.. c :f.r l� 0 5 a on of f r ed c1 � .n. ). -� al th ll fi sh w � I' K at I �l X� fr � � 1n 0 . ti nera� cla f Hf 0 c� rca is� . 40 1 tl� 31. �
�T� � � 26 -l - tie 0 s. , n the d fu 1 oil used � v' 1 ioner � � y � er � � 0 � o nt t.1t1o f 1 � � there of au � 1. v � � ' Tar ff t f 1.) � 1. �A g �� 1 0 1. t � t t� c ��� l � cl � v�, 1� � � � Cuat 4 8 t the nd ecti ,. 7 1� th ut r n nc n � to coat � � � uat � 1 7. � 3?1 405
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 3967 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3967)
- CTA Case No. 3383 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3383)
- MIFFI LOGISTICS CO., INC. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9122)
- MISAMIS ORIENTAL RURAL ELECTRIC SERVICE COOPERATIVE, INC (MORESCO-I), v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (CIR)(CTA Case No. 10987)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. KURIMOTO (PHILIPPINES) CORP.,(CTA Case No. EB 2190)
- TAIAN (SUBIC) ELECTRIC, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6314)
- IBMS TECHNOLOGY PHILS. CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10606)
- PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10279)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.