CTA Case No. 613 (Decision)
~� -. ? U L (.; TH P! .lLIPPlN � COURT OF TAX APPEA.I...S c N.A.NIU X� � � � . e�r�, � vr u � � � � 61 � ~ ~N~ VE j -2.- nt. -- . . � .. ... -... .. � X � lt � c 1 ct c a� t 1one c., tn e po d II' al yin� ec pl I $ ._ n t 0 0 ... � f � ) t tax n r!o i:r 7t 1� � r f .r hw � t l t � e 1 1;)1 t 1 r ( l; epu 1125 l l f � t u y In r � ue 1 1� y� l 1 e ( 11 ct nt � n �.. J . � ey. 1� � � � . c. �121 t wi 350
r ''! . � f� �� i t l.e f � .X' ~ c t� I t 0 � r c ft f r � f t l f " or c 1 r c t l',, c r tl c c t t el .I..I. � � r �0 �l I c ... .1 yJ s t � vf .., f 1 ., 352
l 't 13 � .. t t '' t ! I t ully, rt F ty n If � (p � l � . u 95 � 1 ~ '(. t n � c ll � .. th - fun o ... 1 y � u 0 ~� 'f.;u �J XC ss u 1.., 7 "�~� c1 0 'X n s x. c. .ra l p. 4 ... , 0 � 6C , 6t t the tr P a ly� s r ct y 0 �h t v�ru~a 0 � ct �~~ �-P' b t c c c. l) 353
OE~*., :r(A~ :e. f � . ,. (. �~ t.. >,j(.". 61~ Cl. l Ct lt.r . r on 0 niy, � tt at .ts t 1 a .. ot.�.~. 1 n � r: { ~ d .v' -o it. 'I> ~ e .~tit101 ... h~r~in 1 a. c. ! t i to t;n.e a~p. cv .1 f ~1ep lie ~~ t ax f r nd . X' x !:ant dten ' o~f! . ~-><!'U. rt c:ons:t�..:. r c Clil � 1 pri �iltl;:tc "'oncedido por 1 ;.;r ~�~ nte 1 eon� ee~ion.. ;;.to1 SU$ $UC' so os o c ionar:tcs ab n~ ~.sF. t.r �t.:rxcstraL:tttnte a la t.~sc:rer. ...� d '.loay o en �' ' (lr.�<-;e y i.Q~ p l!,'fl ~l� c;~s(,l de q e e t s ' -c �ltin:cs iu (il s.en ~ ut i: -d com� .1 n -unr.etptos 0 .d �
1 � 355
c 1 .... t �!" o.r c l� � sc t� y ly .r oy l .f.� ... t t 356
� c. l . ;!) . � t fX 0 fr nc hould $ t on~td . ng t.h t tl h ti { 0 y .l'.i . -r.:i �� t t~� ~io. 7 . n 1 ... ... 1 ( . Vol 'o. �9 , . � l61 0J l6l<') an n ..:.e t.io 2'69 of t. T ., ct. :ton .... of '' ;Ct a'liG\ .,. ~15 {2"'} � the ~� () IJ(,xt..f .f; d tu la .. r . Jl n �� I c.. vs 1 "..".,' ll ctor of In .. \.even to pay �the } -h for"" � h taxp y r retn 1 � , ... rr�� nc hiiil � t-" a p.rasc.ri}!) i n ~ ;t on I � no c oll c ...d i~ 1: and .hat in~ludeji r. t n} _pQn t1G �roSe- rnc11~ tn 357
. � � n - � r<(' � � t on n f ny � f ty, l. ' � � l � � l ' 358 . \:.�\' **""' $ ffl'#" t 1 *b':.Jio
/ � - () ' t � ... � 359
� - 11 - � X a c f h rx f� tl hi y v !n 1 n �a1 t y y r an la � 1 t1 .... 1 � J c 11 .- y 2.} � t X. t t ll a !i''9 of t t e~ t c� � n ' � fr ax. � h c; on y .�.. 0 f t et � � ' 0 lly � rty1 �� li t� �� � l - �"� � o. � 1 � t h t 6 fl:' .: $ J fr c 1e � 1 t;r � . A�� t- 360
-- d b �ny � b.ortt, h. t$u v ' tl x fr t 1"Hl� g) a nu nt , ) X un ctp l .c X ,~--~~ ( 1. ' x) X X X .1 c � ~t i o� t tiC r fr m t � i1ymtmt of " �l l r 1 ~ t� (;Q l 1. com ~e ,ri o "" ~1 c I!J; Ulfl:QE=Q t hJ p i � noth� g � 361
,- � -- l �1 I t 1 ~ nt l ~) , 1 p � tal p nounf'">�'Zl'!')ft lc an la, ' 362
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 1435 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1435)
- CTA Case No. 4890 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4890)
- ARDCI NGO GROUP, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9056)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. NUBE STORAGE SYSTEMS, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 1924)
- CTA Case No. 4530 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4530)
- CTA Case No. 2093 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2093)
- CTA Case No. 261 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 261)
- H. TAMBUNTING PAWNSHOP, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 68)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.