[ G. R. No. 38827. May 10, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38827. May 10, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38827
[ G. R. No. 38827. May 10, 1934 ]
THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, PETITIONER, VS. SATURNINO ABAO ET AL., CLAIMANTS, ADELA FIRMALINO ET AL., CLAIMANTS AND APPELLANTS, JOSE MORENTE, CLAIMANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
The Court having regularly acquired jurisdiction of the a.bove-entitled cause submitted lay "both parties for decision, after consideration thereof "by the Court upon the fecord, its decision and order for judgment having been filed on the 24th day of April, A. D. nineteen hundred and thirty-four;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the orders and decision appealed from by all the appellants are set aside and the record remand 3d to Hie court of origin, with the following instructions which must "be strictly complied with, to wit:
1. All the appellants shall be allowed to question tho validity of the alleged transfers, conveyances and donations in favor of Salvador pirmalino, Antonio de Habana and of the appellee Jose Morente, respectively, permitting them to present such material and pertinent evidence which they may desire to offer; and the appellee shall be permitted to prurient all the material and pertinent evidence of the defense, permitting them to use tho evidence already appearing in the record;
2. All the appellants shall be permitted to present material and pertinent evidence as to whether or not the
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 11434. December 20, 1916 ](G.R. No. 11434)
- [ G.R. No. 243812. July 07, 2021 ](907 Phil. 500)
- G.R. No. 116025, February 22, 1996
- [ G.R. No. 130602. March 15, 2000 ](384 Phil. 732)
- G.R. No. 184666, June 27, 2016
- [ G. R. No. L-10129. April 22, 1957 ]
- G.R. No. 159328, October 05, 2011
- [ G. R. No. 40950. August 10, 1934 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.