CTA Case No. 333 (Resolution)

� .. , .... .. � .....A � - -. ...... . .. ... ..

� � -.. 2 '$ . . 3~ "' ). s of , t X !I 0 U 1st" int d 2. 31 w .� 2 (L!Ju bit � y lS l9f'1"' { xhiblt tt � ,. 0 io � � 3 � c � '� l p. 129 , I� GCO ,;,j. this l a se ... l:' iv y p t1 on n J' �nu y lSI, 19~ � - .... � t int �re d t . of J& ary 21 . 19~ � 1 1 � atrilnts O�f 1)-f tr' 1nt a d la cons ~rue i'V � 19 (p. 7 , ill l: ' CO" t� p. 2 . p .t. 2. �oppoii!iti t uc: �or. n rc:n Jl. 1~53� t thft e;ce * o id � r � Tl ,� ! � ~tiel $ r still under eon tru �.. tiv istr !n ( p . 2 t ,.. ppo it o to ��nl � ta- lon n V:r: e t oti 1 t � iil!':x:ant6 of Distraint . JAvy ). fil.in, of h.t ltl ll o.r r vi o D <::ember e.. l :),_ a�:Jr than t� r b. fin 1 d s en of' esp ndent 1: e1 Gi' � �: p .\1 � h � f tle �ton t ;< . .b .. J.

� J �ht c ' 243

� , -� � � � � y� 244 J