Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Jurisdiction Over Search Warrants: Criminal Court vs Issuing Court
Once a criminal case is filed in another court, that trial court has jurisdiction over any challenge to the search warrant.
Negligence and Evidence: How Philippine Courts Determine Liability in Quasi-Delict Cases
Learn how Philippine courts weigh evidence in quasi-delict cases, using Supreme Transliner v. Brazal to explain negligence and liability rules.
Dismissal of Court Employee for Misconduct, Dishonesty, and Abuse of Authority in the Judiciary
A sheriff and court OIC was dismissed for drunken misconduct, dishonesty, and abuse of authority. The ruling underscores ethical standards in the judiciary.
Conviction Upheld on Circumstantial Evidence in Carnapping-Murder Case
The Supreme Court explains when circumstantial evidence suffices for conviction and why unproven aggravating circumstances mean reclusion perpetua, not death.
Navigating Force Majeure When Strikes Excuse Contractual Delays in Philippine Law
When do strikes excuse delayed delivery? The Supreme Court explains force majeure, good faith, and damages in government bidding.
Finality of Judgments: When Unappealed Decisions Stand Firm in Philippine Law
Explore the doctrine of finality of judgments in Philippine law and why unappealed decisions become binding and executory.
Intimidation in Rape Cases: Protecting Minor Victims Under Philippine Law
How Philippine courts assess intimidation, delay in reporting, and child testimony in rape cases involving minors.
Credibility of Rape Victim's Testimony: Supreme Court on Conflicting Evidence and Behavioral Expectations
The Supreme Court affirms a rape conviction, explaining why a victim's testimony prevails over alibi and why resistance is not always required.
Why Qualifying Circumstances Must Be Alleged in Rape Informations
The Supreme Court explains why failure to allege minority and use of a deadly weapon in a rape information downgrades the crime to simple rape.
Reasonable Doubt Prevails: Acquittal in Forcible Abduction and Rape Case Based on Inconsistent Testimony
Supreme Court acquits accused in forcible abduction with rape case, ruling that inconsistent testimony and lack of resistance failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Qualifying Circumstances in Rape: Why Specific Allegation in the Information Matters
The Supreme Court clarifies that qualifying circumstances like minority and use of a deadly weapon must be alleged in the information to justify the death penalty.
Repealed Law Cannot Govern Licensure Exams: Lessons from Bordallo v. PRC
When a new law repeals an old one, examiners cannot apply the old passing rate. The Supreme Court explains why in Bordallo v. PRC.
Rape Conviction Upheld: Penetration, Not Hymen Damage, Is the Key
An intact hymen does not negate rape. The Supreme Court clarifies that slight penetration suffices for conviction.
Negligence in Court Duties: Releasing Funds Without Proper Authorization
Court cash clerk fined for releasing deposited funds without court order, highlighting strict accountability standards for judicial employees.
Double Sale of Land: Why Prior Registration Alone Does Not Win Ownership
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that in double sales of land, prior registration only prevails if the second buyer acted in good faith throughout.
Dying Declarations and Witness Credibility: Reevaluating Guilt in Homicide Cases
Philippine Supreme Court clarifies rape conviction standards, intact hymen evidence, and proper death penalty application in People v. Dayna.
The Boundaries of Consent: Statutory Rape and the Exploitation of Minors in the Philippines
The Supreme Court's ruling in People v. Jalosjos clarifies that statutory rape applies regardless of consent, especially when minors are exploited.
Judicial Overreach and the Boundaries of Preliminary Investigations in the Philippines
Sales v. Sandiganbayan clarifies that preliminary investigations are substantive rights, not mere formalities, and sets limits on prosecutorial discretion.
Rape and Parental Authority: Proving Qualifying Circumstances for Enhanced Penalties
In rape cases, the death penalty requires proof of both the victim's minority and the offender's relationship. This case explains why.
Safeguarding Due Process: The Right to a Complete Preliminary Investigation
When an incomplete preliminary investigation leads to a warrant of arrest, the Supreme Court steps in to protect the accused's right to due process.
Intact Hymen Does Not Negate Rape: SC Upholds Conviction But Reduces Death Penalty
Supreme Court affirms rape conviction despite intact hymen, but reduces death penalty to reclusion perpetua for lack of qualifying circumstances.
On Duty or Off Target: Defining Course of Employment in Police Compensation Claims
The Supreme Court clarifies when a police officer's death is compensable under employees' compensation law, applying the 24-hour duty doctrine.
Positive Identification Trumps Alibi Upholding Conviction IN Multiple Murder Case
Usury Under Scrutiny: How the Supreme Court Uncovers Hidden Interest in Loan Agreements
In First Metro Investment Corp. v. Este del Sol, the Supreme Court exposed underwriting and consultancy fees as cloaks for usurious interest in a 1978 loan.